Lmao. Good lord.
I was referring to DASCA.Lmao. Good lord.
It's likesuch is the case with half the laws..... :/
Bulk powders are for those experimenting with their own pres and other fat nurnersDamn! 1/16 of a teaspoon has 200mg of caffeine in it! Just seems like an unnecessary product when you can buy 500 tabs of 200mg for $15. I don't want to eyeball 1/16 of a teaspoon. I feel for the parents of the kids, but the last thing in the world we need is the government getting involved. Can we please just do our own due diligence and not have political retards getting in our way. You get them involved in caffeine and my god creatine is going to be next.
If its such an easy mistake why do the statistics point otherwise?Caffeine is drug. Powdered caffeine shouldn't be used by anyone except for in a lab setting. I could see anyone making a mistake with dosing it, confusing it with another powder while rushing out the door...So many possibilities exist for a mistake to be made. The comparisons to donuts and creatine in this thread are absolutely ridiculous. It's powder caffeine, who cares if it's banned. You can get tablets for next to nothing.
Not sure how long the actual powdered version has been widely available to the general public. I'm not sure statistics prove much anyhow.If its such an easy mistake why do the statistics point otherwise?
I understand your point, but I don't believe that it's the government's place to tell me that I can't have something because someone else might misuse it.Caffeine is drug. Powdered caffeine shouldn't be used by anyone except for in a lab setting. I could see anyone making a mistake with dosing it, confusing it with another powder while rushing out the door...So many possibilities exist for a mistake to be made. The comparisons to donuts and creatine in this thread are absolutely ridiculous. It's powder caffeine, who cares if it's banned. You can get tablets for next to nothing.
If it was caffeine in general I'd agree. Since it's the powdered form though I think it's actually a smart move.I understand your point, but I don't believe that it's the government's place to tell me that I can't have something because someone else might misuse it.
i bet you also would like to ban beds without guard rails since they account for 400+ deaths per yearIf it was caffeine in general I'd agree. Since it's the powdered form though I think it's actually a smart move.
That's an absurd analogy (much like many of the others in this thread).i bet you also would like to ban beds without guard rails since they account for 400+ deaths per year
Thanks captain obviousThat's an absurd analogy (much like many of the others in this thread).
13 deaths is a lot from a dietary supplement. And this is being encouraged by the poison control centers within the United States. These are the people that deal with it everyday. You also must consider the number and seriousness of these problems. Death is bad, but kidney failures aren't so great either.
This isn't a ban on ALL caffeine. It's simply a request to remove bulk powdered caffeine from the market. Your freedom to use caffeine is not being taken away.
I appreciate the insult.Thanks captain obvious
call something absurd, then provide no reasoning. Its absurd because .... ... .... ....
You also stated that cigarettes should be legal because they cannot cause acute deaths, seemingly making it sound more acceptable that people die from cigarette use, despite the fact that deaths from smoking and deaths from bulk caffeine aren't even in the same bracket on a yearly basis.
13 deaths was including energy drinks, 5 of which were associated with monster... .... ...
Literally your argument is well people might use it incorrectly!!!!!!
dont be so cheeks, it wasnt an insult capI appreciate the insult.
Cigarettes are legal. Now a cigarette that contains enough tobacco to kill you from one smoke, that would be illegal (assuming it's even possible).
That's also a proper analogy in this scenario.
Agreed. Ban caffeine powder but not caps/pills. Really easy to overdose if you mis-measure.That's an absurd analogy (much like many of the others in this thread).
13 deaths is a lot from a dietary supplement. And this is being encouraged by the poison control centers within the United States. These are the people that deal with it everyday. You also must consider the number and seriousness of these problems. Death is bad, but kidney failures aren't so great either.
This isn't a ban on ALL caffeine. It's simply a request to remove bulk powdered caffeine from the market. Your freedom to use caffeine is not being taken away.
And yet overdoses are extremely rare. So we should restrict choice for the entire country because a few people die of caffeine overdoses every year?Agreed. Ban caffeine powder but not caps/pills. Really easy to overdose if you mis-measure.
Its not just about ODing though is it. Its about medical resources being redirected from more important mattersAnd yet overdoses are extremely rare. So we should restrict choice for the entire country because a few people die of caffeine overdoses every year?
This is the exact argument for why EVERY drug should be legal if cigarettes and alcohol are legal. And alcohol is probably a better example....it can mistakenly kill and does so every day, it can be intentionally used for suicide, ERs are swarmed with the after effects of its use at any given moment, etc.Its not just about ODing though is it. Its about medical resources being redirected from more important matters
....YET. haha.Government is not making billions of dollars off of bulk caffeine powder sales.
Its called instructions, read themThere's a lot of ridiculous stuff in this thread. They are looking to ban the pure powder because it would be easy to overdose when 1/16 tsp = 200mg. Also, there is a viable option with the pills, which will factor into the case. Realistically there is no utility to the powder that the capsules cannot provide, or, if there is, it isn't greater than the potential harm this product poses (death is already proven).
Comparing it to alcohol, cigarettes, hot coffee, etc. is absurd and not a realistic legal argument. Also, watch the "Hot Coffee" documentary, chances are you dont know all the facts.
You mean ER resources? Are you serious?Its not just about ODing though is it. Its about medical resources being redirected from more important matters
Who is pushing this through? Their resources.You mean ER resources? Are you serious?
I didn't contradict myself at all. Judging by your grammar and argument, it just went over your head. Cigarettes will never be banned because America has a long history of tobacco crops sustaining the country, it is an outlier. Alcohol must be 21+ to purchase, cigarettes 18+, caffeine powder has no restriction. Furthermore, the capsules are a safer alternative that are currently available.Its called instructions, read them
Your contradicting yourself, well realistically there are other options!!!! Its so easy to overdose!!! The potential harm this product poses!!!
Brb cigarrettes kill hundreds of thousands of people each year, brb alcoholism costs millions to treat
brb its an absurd argument cuz like it wouldn't be a good legal argument ROFL
Your right cigarettes and alcohol pose a much greater risk than bulk caffeine ever has
So government should save idiots from themselves? Is that really what we want? If stupid people kill themselves WHO CARES!!!!! Not I.I didn't contradict myself at all. Judging by your grammar and argument, it just went over your head. Cigarettes will never be banned because America has a long history of tobacco crops sustaining the country, it is an outlier. Alcohol must be 21+ to purchase, cigarettes 18+, caffeine powder has no restriction. Furthermore, the capsules are a safer alternative that are currently available.
It would be similar if acetaminophen was sold in bulk powder form, the potential risk of harm is far greater than the utility it provides. Tylenol is capsulated for a reason, it is dangerous is measured incorrectly. This is no different.
Even a child would realize that 10+ no-doz pills is too much, whereas the powder is harder to determine what is too much in a child's hands.
It's called natural selection.So government should save idiots from themselves? Is that really what we want? If stupid people kill themselves WHO CARES!!!!! Not I.
lmao, remember that time you have to call out people for grammar because your argument has hit rock bottom.I didn't contradict myself at all. Judging by your grammar and argument, it just went over your head. Cigarettes will never be banned because America has a long history of tobacco crops sustaining the country, it is an outlier. Alcohol must be 21+ to purchase, cigarettes 18+, caffeine powder has no restriction. Furthermore, the capsules are a safer alternative that are currently available.
It would be similar if acetaminophen was sold in bulk powder form, the potential risk of harm is far greater than the utility it provides. Tylenol is capsulated for a reason, it is dangerous is measured incorrectly. This is no different.
Even a child would realize that 10+ no-doz pills is too much, whereas the powder is harder to determine what is too much in a child's hands.
lmao, remember that time you have to call out people for grammar because your argument has hit rock bottom. No one likes the grammar police captain Acetaminophen capped!!!!! Even a child can realize 10 is too much!!!!!!!! O wait, they cant>>>>>>> "Overdosing is especially common in children, who may be given too much medicine or may accidentally ingest it." "Data compiled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has linked as many as 980 deaths in a year to drugs containing acetaminophen." 980.... .... ... Numbers dont lie captain
What are the number of households that have bulk caffeine vs. tylenol? Incidence rate per use is the only useful number, which you failed to provide. You also didn't argue anything other than "o wait, they can't."lmao, remember that time you have to call out people for grammar because your argument has hit rock bottom.
No one likes the grammar police captain
Acetaminophen capped!!!!! Even a child can realize 10 is too much!!!!!!!! O wait, they cant>>>>>>>
"Overdosing is especially common in children, who may be given too much medicine or may accidentally ingest it."
"Data compiled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has linked as many as 980 deaths in a year to drugs containing acetaminophen."
980.... .... ...
Numbers dont lie captain
why is it, do you think, that aspirin isnt sold in powder form? Pills require a more concious effort to OD on, but if you had powdered aspirin, I bet there would be a call for its removal.For all of those saying the "potential to overdose" is the reason to ban caffeine....what exactly IS the potential to overdose? From what I see you would have to take 50-100 servings of caffeine, totaling 10-20 grams of powder, in order to overdose if you are a healthy person. Even if it only takes you 5 grams - that's an absurd abuse of the product, equal to 25-50 doses (depending if you consider 100 or 200 mg to be the dose).
Try taking 20 times the amount of aspirin that you normally take. And if you think people don't do that "by mistake", popping a pill here and another there, and another an hour later for days on end.....then I won't be able to convince you.
Well obviously acetaminophen accidentally causes more deaths, when its in almost every single household. How many households have bulk caffeine powder?
So there goes that....
The caps have not shown statistically to be safer, neither has the liquid drinks, and neither has preworkout supplementsWhat are the number of households that have bulk caffeine vs. tylenol? Incidence rate per use is the only useful number, which you failed to provide. You also didn't argue anything other than "o wait, they can't."
And, as I've repeatedly said, medications provide a specific use, caffeine powder doesn't. The caps provide a safer alternative for almost the same cost. That is how the courts will view this if and when there is a products liability suit.
Captain, we get it ,its not a ban on all caffeinewhy is it, do you think, that aspirin isnt sold in powder form? Pills require a more concious effort to OD on, but if you had powdered aspirin, I bet there would be a call for its removal.
5g of caffeine would be around a teaspoon depending on its density; that alone would be enough to cause serious discomfort. Many people fail to fathom that a typical dose is so small.
They are not banning caffeine, just powder.
Its really not a big deal
hahahahahah i dont mind being called a captain, i dont get as cheeks as most people in hereWhile I agree with your points, I have to wonder if you call people "captain" in real life when making a point to help solidify it. You sure seem to use it a bit.
I know, I am being a captain by pointing this out. lol
Acetaminophen is sold in caps because it's regulated as a drug. Federal law and regulation specify approved dosage forms.I didn't contradict myself at all. Judging by your grammar and argument, it just went over your head. Cigarettes will never be banned because America has a long history of tobacco crops sustaining the country, it is an outlier. Alcohol must be 21+ to purchase, cigarettes 18+, caffeine powder has no restriction. Furthermore, the capsules are a safer alternative that are currently available.
It would be similar if acetaminophen was sold in bulk powder form, the potential risk of harm is far greater than the utility it provides. Tylenol is capsulated for a reason, it is dangerous is measured incorrectly. This is no different.
Even a child would realize that 10+ no-doz pills is too much, whereas the powder is harder to determine what is too much in a child's hands.
So you'd be ok if they banned books as long as they allowed magazines? I mean, it's not as if they banned the written word entirely.why is it, do you think, that aspirin isnt sold in powder form? Pills require a more concious effort to OD on, but if you had powdered aspirin, I bet there would be a call for its removal.
5g of caffeine would be around a teaspoon depending on its density; that alone would be enough to cause serious discomfort. Many people fail to fathom that a typical dose is so small.
They are not banning caffeine, just powder.
Its really not a big deal
i have said it before, i will say it again....you cannot write laws that will protect stupid people from themselves. stupid people are always going to find ways to hurt themselves!!!I can see the merits of both sides of this, on the one hand, bulk caffeine powder allows people to get a really long term supply for really cheap.
On the other hand, it is problematic for people who don't have an mg scale to accurately dose it.
I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be able to buy bulk caffeine powder, but I can certainly understand why we don't want dumb kids buying it.
Hard to find a happy medium.
The happy medium is allowing people the opportunity to be responsible for themselves and their children.I can see the merits of both sides of this, on the one hand, bulk caffeine powder allows people to get a really long term supply for really cheap.
On the other hand, it is problematic for people who don't have an mg scale to accurately dose it.
I don't see any reason why I shouldn't be able to buy bulk caffeine powder, but I can certainly understand why we don't want dumb kids buying it.
Hard to find a happy medium.
You're skipping the step of why the sell them in those dosages, and why it's regulated. The reason is for safety and because small inaccuracies in dosage will cause harm. You state a conclusion without realizing how that came to be.Acetaminophen is sold in caps because it's regulated as a drug. Federal law and regulation specify approved dosage forms.
Same for aspirin.
Oh I know all that. I was simply pointing out that the comparison is a poor one. Incidentally, acetaminophen is more dangerous that caffeine, regardless of the form in which it is dosed.You're skipping the step of why the sell them in those dosages, and why it's regulated. The reason is for safety and because small inaccuracies in dosage will cause harm. You state a conclusion without realizing how that came to be.
You cannot protect stupid from stupid. Stupid will always be stupidi have said it before, i will say it again....you cannot write laws that will protect stupid people from themselves. stupid people are always going to find ways to hurt themselves!!!
according to your logic guns, knives and sharp instruments should also be banned because of the risk of a stupid person doing something stupid!!!
I agree with this.Oh I know all that. I was simply pointing out that the comparison is a poor one. Incidentally, acetaminophen is more dangerous that caffeine, regardless of the form in which it is dosed.
I simply don't believe that in a free society, the appropriate response to a few isolated incidents is to make a new law banning things or restricting the whole populace. For example, there are literally tens of millions of "high capacity" magazines in the possession of millions of private citizens In the U.S. And yet some psycho uses a dozen or so when he shoots up a school and people want to punish millions for the bad actions of one. My own state forced me to give up thousands of dollars worth of legally acquired property in the wake of Sandy Hook.
Freedom is dangerous, and freedom demands personal responsibility. I believe that we are responsible for ourselves, and it is not the job of the government to protect us from ourselves - only from each other. I'm willing to accept the risk that more bad things will happen in a free society. A lot of people, clearly, are not.