I'll take both! Er... wait, my team *has* both. Lucky me :wave2:
I'd definitely take Henrik over Datsyuk, though.
I'd definitely take Henrik over Datsyuk, though.
I'm obligated to hate you now since you're a Wings fan...I'll take both! Er... wait, my team *has* both. Lucky me :wave2:
Hell, no. I hate them, too. I am an Avs fan, hence my man-love for Foppa. It's going to a be a long 3 years.No problem, man. I understand
But hey... I'm in Detroit. At least I have SOMETHING good, ya know?
And your team is... the Stars?
Avs, eh? Good deal. Lots of good games between us! I miss the old rivalry.I am an Avs fan
All it takes is one incident to cause a nasty rivalry. That being said, neither team has the real snarl to have anything close.Very true. I always hope for some sort of new rivalry with Detroit and whoever... but nothing seems to stick. Chicago is looking pretty upset right now, and they're really young, so hopefully that can brew up... but nothing else has been like Wings-Avs.
It appears as if my team [Pens] and your team [Wings] are on a collision course for the first Finals rematch since '84 [IIRC]. Except, obviously, with a drastically different result!:thanks:One incident... or maybe one more brutal check to Marty Havlat
I'm surprised the guy can skate at this point (well, assuming he actually plays the next game).
Nice, hah! I was waiting to see how you'd respond to that!It will be a good series, Mullet. And it's nice to see a rematch in the cup finals.
I think it's going to be a better series than last season, but I believe in my team, and I'm looking forward to us being the first team to repeat as Stanley Cup Champions since... well... the Red Wings :wave2:
He is quite the enigma, for precisely the sentiment contained in your last sentiment. The fact is this: any above-average goalie could have won cups with those Detroit teams; preview their defensive statistics from their cup years to verify this! In fact, Ty Conklin, a less-than-average goalie [see: his years in Edmonton] carried Detroit to the second seed in a tough Western Conference this year!I was reading an blog by Buccigross over at ESPN and it got me thinking about this question: if the Wings repeat, is Osgood a HoFer?
Objectively, when you look at the numbers, it's a push (he'll have over 400 wins and a 2.47 GAA), but he would have 4 cups.
Personally, I say not at all because I don't think of him when I am asked the elite goalies of the past 15 years.
His overall playoff GAA is 2.11. He was amazing last year in the playoffs and, IMO, should have won the Conn Smythe.He is quite the enigma, for precisely the sentiment contained in your last sentiment. The fact is this: any above-average goalie could have won cups with those Detroit teams; preview their defensive statistics from their cup years to verify this! In fact, Ty Conklin, a less-than-average goalie [see: his years in Edmonton] carried Detroit to the second seed in a tough Western Conference this year!
If you truly want to judge Osgood, take a gander at his PK statistics from this playoffs: an .889 save percentage and a phenomenal amount of goals against. Detroit wins in spite of, and not because of, Osgood.
By the way, he is from my birthplace of Medicine Hat, a place I lived for the middle fifteen years of my life; even people there do not feel he is a good goalie! P.S., Trevor Linden was also from Medicine Hat.
Yes, but GAA is not an individual stat, it is a team statistic: it depends upon the defensive play of an entire team, which was more or less the thrust of my argument above.His overall playoff GAA is 2.11. He was amazing last year in the playoffs and, IMO, should have won the Conn Smythe.
5-on-5 they have been fine, but the penalty kill: whoa!I will concede that Detroit's defense this year has been awful - penalty kill included.
You are certainly right, Tribal; I have probably jinxed us both, hah!We shall see, Mullet. We shall see. First we just need both of our teams to close things out
A Canes vs Hawks series just doesn't seem as entertaining :dunno:You are certainly right, Tribal; I have probably jinxed us both, hah!
Absolutely! I am one broke mo-fo right now, so how about the $25 one? http://www.nutraplanet.com/product/nutraplanet/gift-certificate-25.htmlFriendly wager if our teams make it to the cup, though? An NP gift certificate, perhaps?
Sounds good!A Canes vs Hawks series just doesn't seem as entertaining :dunno:
Absolutely! I am one broke mo-fo right now, so how about the $25 one? http://www.nutraplanet.com/product/nutraplanet/gift-certificate-25.html
Not quite yet, tribal. It has been a home series thus far, so I wouldn't get your hopes up for a win on Tuesday.Are you shining up that NP gift certificate for me yet, Mullet?
I feel a game seven is likely, given the way each team has dominated in their buildings. Obviously, this means that in order to win the Cup Pittsburgh needs to do something it has only done once in these past two Cup Finals: win a game in Detroit.It had indeed. I'll openly admit Detroit has looked sub-par (especially defensively) while in Pitts. I think getting Datsyuk back was a huge boost. While I would rather us parade the cup around home ice, I'll take a game 6 win as well. But I wouldn't doubt this going 7 games (as a lot of series have in this years playoffs).
Which is unlikely, as Babcock publicly stated that the frenzy to line-match with Bylsma ruined chemistry between the other lines, and resulted in poor play on Zetterberg's behalf. Babcock will most likely stick Henrik on Crosby, but not as patently as he had the previous four games [showed again in Game 5]. The only match-up he seems keen on sticking with is Lidstrom/Rafalski on Crosby's line.As Mike Babcock has said multiple times this playoff year "I don't buy into momentum". I really think he's right.
Having Datsyuk and Zetterberg (both Selke caliber forwards) gives Babcock the option to roll Z with Crosby and Datsyuk with Malkin, or if Bylsma decides Crosby and Malkin need to be out together most the game (which I suspect), we can go with Z and Datsyuk on the same line.
We will see. Crosby and Malkin's play in this series, when it has been poor, is more a function of self-destructing rather than sound defensive play, as Malkin was the leading point-getter in the series irrespective of whom was defending him, and Crosby was generating a lot of chances - free ice or not, the great ones find a way to get it done. I think you are over-estimating the defensive play of Detroit in game five, and underestimating the Penguins' team meltdown. Crosby and Malkin will be fine.Either way, don't expect as much free play for your two stars Tuesday night. While I don't think they'll be relegated to 2 combined shots like they were last night, I don't believe they're going to combine for 4 points again like they did games 3 and 4.
Lets do it again fellas!
Uhh... if you made this statement Friday it would have been true :sleeping:Best of three series with two games in Detroit....I'll take the Wings!
Thanks for the clarification, champ.That's Draper holding the cup, big guy
Your arguments hold value, but as you stated, that's why they play. We can talk all we want about what "should" happen, but that doesn't translate to a cup (or else Detroit would have taken a cup in '96 when they had 62 regular season wins).
My prediction (using last years photos) -
Well, it depends on how you consider the Conn Smythe to be awarded - that is, as the "playoff MVP" or the "finals MVP". With 31 points and 15 goals, Crosby's scoresheet looks incredibly similar, and he has been far more consistent throughout the playoffs; a better "all around player", so to speak. If Crosby were to pick it up through the next two games, and Pittsburgh wins, he should by rights garner the trophy. The collective memory in the sports world is short and only tangible: Crosby has played better in all aspects throughout this run.I got a question for you, Mullet.
Five times (and not since 2003) the Conn Smyth trophy has been awarded to a member of the losing team in the Stanley Cup Finals. Assuming Pitts loses, do you think Malkin should be awarded the trophy?
He currently has 14 goals, 21 assists, 3 game winners, and 99 SOG. Nobody on the Wings roster has stats close to that.
If a Red Wing is to take the trophy, I think the only way it would be fair (to Pitts) is to give it to Osgood (15-6, 2.00 GAA, .927 SV, 2 SO).
Your thoughts?
In any other season I might agree with you, but we've been extremely porous this year. We (Detroit) wondered all year if we would even make it this far because of our defense this season. It has not been good. Luckily we ended up scoring a lot of goals, otherwise our record would have been much worse.While you and I could tandem goalie for the Wings and win the William Jennings trophy
Let me tell you, tribal: Sid has been unbelievable. He has scored the opening or go-ahead goal more times for his team than any other in the playoffs; he has been stellar on face-offs [up until now]; incredible defensively, and; most importantly, he has led this team. The fact that, in a head-to-head duel, he out-scored Ovechkin while playing a more dominating and defensively sound game after not being nominated for the Hart is fantastic in-and-of-itself.I haven't seen much of Pitts besides the finals, so I'll take your word on Crosby's performance throughout the entire playoffs. I knew he had similar stats, but if anything, hockey is a sport that does not reflect the entire game on a box score.
I suppose that is true: Detroit has been letting in a ton of goals, compared with previous years. That being said, Ty Conklin still ran up a fantastic record with Detroit, and he is, by rights, a terrible goalie [ran out of Edmonton, for example]. While most of the greatest goalies ever had fantastic defenses [Brodeur in NJ; Dryden in Montreal] Detroit's particular style of play means any schmuck can win there, and win big.In any other season I might agree with you, but we've been extremely porous this year. We (Detroit) wondered all year if we would even make it this far because of our defense this season. It has not been good. Luckily we ended up scoring a lot of goals, otherwise our record would have been much worse.
Here is what I meant! Crosby, FTW.For one, Malkin's no defensive powerhouse, and despite scoring all those points, he's only a plus-2 after 22 games. He also doesn't kill penalties and hasn't been getting the most difficult opposition as teams focus on Crosby.
He's also tied with Joni Pitkanen(notes) and Joe Corvo(notes) for having been on the ice for the most 5-on-5 goals against of any player, and has a GA/60 of 3.35, second highest on the Pens. Crosby's, in comparison, is just 2.22, while Zetterberg is at 1.39.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘Another one bites the dust’ | Supplements | 41 | ||
Time to give this another go. | Workout Logs | 52 | ||
m14ad bulk-msten,epi,or another for a stack | Anabolics | 15 | ||
Back with another cycle thread🥳 | Anabolics | 20 | ||
Should I add another weights session or some cardio? | Training Forum | 4 |