exactly..with a ph u only get a % to convert..with a ps its 100 percent active..wikki defines a ph as "A prohormone is a substance that is a precursor to a hormone, usually having minimal hormonal effect by itself."
when i say prohormone i refer to a steroid compound that has no intrinsinc activity and must metabolize into an active compound to exert its a/a effectsHey PA
What is the difference between a PH and PS? Aren't they a same thing that they convert to steroids in the liver?
yesso you're saying that a pro-steroid and a steroid is a same thing then? since both requires no conversion?
thats not how its usedProsteroid= conversion to synthetic man made steroid (Tren,dbol,deca, etc)
thank youyes
i just use the term prosteroid because its been coined so much. it is really a stupid term but its recognized to mean a steroid which is active and sold as a supplement
that is not the definition of a steroid.nope, 1-ad and 1-test are prohormones because you have 1-test in your body, you do not however have tren naturally in your body. You have to go back to the definition of a steroid.
Which is a man-made modification of a hormone.
not to be confused with 100% bioavaialbleexactly..with a ph u only get a % to convert..with a ps its 100 percent active.."
I was wrong then.that is not the definition of a steroid.
you are wrong on this
and i was rightI was wrong then.
HAHA! I really hope this 6-bromo issue gets reviewed by the scientists and chemists formulating products with it that are designed for an increase in NATURAL TEST...and not a ph\ps-like conversion being responsible for the strength etcand i was right
you were wrong, and i was right.
did i mention that i was right?
-yer daddy
so if this 6alpha-bromoandrostenedione is a direct precursor to an aas chemical, what is the name of the steroid does it convert to?correct me if i am wrong but is one of the ingredients in restore 6alpha-bromoandrostenedione?
in that case it is a direct precursor to an androgenic-anabolic steroidal chemical
6alpha-bromotestosteroneso if this 6alpha-bromoandrostenedione is a direct precursor to an anabolic steroids chemical, what is the name of the steroid does it convert to?
Ah I see, thanks for that6alpha-bromotestosterone
ok that statement should not have been so definitive. i should have said "highly likely is a direct precursor"Patrick
I've been re-reading the entire thread, and this statement of yours caught my eyes.
so if this 6alpha-bromoandrostenedione is a direct precursor to an anabolic steroids chemical, what is the name of the steroid does it convert to?
Ah I see, thanks for that
I tried to google that compound, but it doesn't come up with anything... Does it have a different name for it?
Oh nevermind, I should have search 6-bromotestosterone instead..
SHHHHHH FnF ! ! ! PA might try to test some beef and get in a fight with some cattle rancher and screw us all with the increment on Beef prices cause it has steroids in it or maybe get beef banned by the FDAI just ate steroids in my beef, I wonder if I will be big soon ???
DMT in elephant pee ? ? i dont recall but i think this is oneThis is way off topic, but isn't there some kind of steroid or ph that comes from some kind of s h i t?. Some animal poop or something?
Fit,I just ate steroids in my beef, I wonder if I will be big soon ???
This is way off topic, but isn't there some kind of steroid or ph that comes from some kind of s h i t?. Some animal poop or something?
Fit,
I used to think you were a pretty smart person but after reading through this you have given me little to base that belief on.
Look PA is not stating it that it will turn into a steroid. There are lots of steroids like androgens, oestrogens, adrenocortical hormones, cardiotonic glycosies and aglycones. These are all steroids and there are many more.
What I am trying to say is that if your product does what it does why dont you show us. SO far you have only stated that PA is a competitor and would love nothing more than to see this be true. Okay, show us that it is not. SO far you have not done that you have only said "people say it works" great that solves the problem for me.
I have not a problem with anabolic steroids usage. I think it would be very cool to find that high doses of 6-alpha bromo were infact able to promote anabolism. However what does bother me is the ambiguous nature with which companies release stuff. I may be completely wrong but I would relaly appreciate you showing me that this compound is not able to suppress the HPTA rather than give out free samples.
Understand that I am not trying to say your product sucks hell it sounds great. But what the problem is, is that your product may in fact not be so good for what people have been using it for "post cycle therapy".
Again this could all be speculation and someone may point out something simple like 6-alpha bromo can not convert to saig 6-bromotest due to XYZ, but until then I find it very strange that you have not provided any evidence and instead state that PA is your competitor and thus we should discredit him.
That is exactly my point. I am not trying to bash Fit or her company. However I would really like to know if this product is the actual 6bromo PA is refering to or if the company has given us another misnomer with calling it 6-bromo (i.e. Diene3).I SECOND THIS. I happen to be USING this product right now in post cycle therapy, and if this is counterproductive i will have a BIG, or shall i say, two tiny little problems hah.
6-Bromo is a perfectly functional steroidal... yes steroidal aromatase inhibitor, whether it be in alpha or beta molecular form. It reminds me a lot like formestane, which I think is a Godsend, although some may disagree. In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.6.beta.-Bromo-1,2.beta.-methylenandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (200 mg) in acetic acid (15 ml) at 15.degree.-20.degree. is treated with a steady stream of dry hydrogen chloride for 1 hour and then kept an additional hour at room temperature. Then water is added and the product isolated with ether. The combined ether extracts are washed with saturated salt solution, 5% sodium carbonate solution, water; dried and evaporated. Column chromatography of residue over silica gel using benzene/ethyl ether as eluant affords pure 6.alpha.-bromo-1,2.beta.-methylenandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (150 mg, 75%).
Following the above reported procedure and starting from the 6.beta.-chloro-1,2.beta.-methylenandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione the epimeric 6.alpha.-chloro-1,2.beta.-methylenandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione can be prepared.
the solid oral forms may contain, together with the active compound, diluents, e.g., lactose, dextrose, saccharose, cellulose, corn starch or potato starch; lubricants, e.g. silica, talc, stearic acid, magnesium or calcium stearate, and/or polyethylene glycols; binding agents, e.g. starches, arabic gums, gelatin, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose or polyvinyl pyrrolidone; disaggregating agents, e.g. a starch, alginic acid, alginates or sodium starch glycolate; effervescing mixtures; dyestuffs; sweeteners; wetting agents, such as lecithin, polysorbates, laurylsulphates; and, in general, non-toxic and pharmacologically inactive substances used in pharmaceutical formulations. Said pharmaceutical preparations may be manufactured in known manner, for example, by means of mixing, granulating, tabletting, sugar-coating, or film-coating processes.
The liquid dispersions for oral administration may be e.g. syrups, emulsions and suspensions.
The syrups may contain as carrier, for example, saccharose or saccharose with glycerine and/or mannitol and/or sorbitol. The suspensions and the emulsions may contain as carrier, for example, a natural gum, agar, sodium alginate, pectin, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, or polyvinyl alcohol.
The suspensions or solutions for intramuscular injections may contain, together with the active compound, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, e.g. sterile water, olive oil, ethyl oleate, glycols, e.g. propylene glycol, and if desired, a suitable amount of lidocaine hydrochloride.
The solutions for intravenous injections or infusions may contain as carrier, for example, sterile water or preferably they may be in the form of sterile, aqueous, isotonic saline solutions. The suppositories may contain together with the active compound a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, e.g. cocoa-butter, polyethylene glycol, a polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester surfactant or lecithin.
The dosage depends on the age, weight, conditions of the patient and administration route; for example the dosage adopted for oral administration to adult humans may range from about 10 to about 150-200 mg pro dose, from 1 to 5 times daily.
In view of their high therapeutic index, the compounds of the invention can be used safely in medicine. For example, the approximate acute toxicity (LD.sub.50) of the compounds of the invention in the mouse, determined by single administration of increasing doses and measured on the seventh day after the treatment was found to be negligible.
The compounds of the invention can be administered in a variety of dosage forms, e.g. orally, in the form of tablets, capsules, sugar or film coated tablets, liquid solutions or suspensions; rectally, in the form of suppositories; parenterally, e.g. intramuscularly, or by intravenous injection or infusion.
The new compounds, incubated at various concentrations, showed a relevant aromatase inhibitory activity.
By virtue of their ability to inhibit aromatase and, consequently, to reduce estrogen levels, the new compounds are useful in the treatment and prevention of various estrogen dependent diseases, i.e., breat, endometrial, ovarian and pancreatic cancers, gynecomastia, benign breast disease, endometriosis, polycystic ovarian disease and precocious puberty. Another application of the compounds of the invention is in the therapeutic and/or prophylactic treatment of prostatic hyperplasia, a disease of the estrogen dependent stromal tissue.
The compounds of the present invention are inhibitors of the biotransformation of androgens into estrogens, i.e., they are steroidal aromatase inhibitors.
I'm kind of surprised that many have not tried researching these compounds themselves. I'd just like to state, as a neutral member here at AM, it's been an awesome pleasure to be actively posting here at Anabolicminds.com. Whether I've had concurrent or conflicting views with all of you members and board sponsors, I really like all of you. I don't sponsor nor do I receive bonuses or products from any company. I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. His lies and treacheries have wreaked havoc on the industry that we are sponsoring and have brought a lot of negative connotations to the athletic communities. This isn't what I'm trying to say... I believe that there may be more to learn on some of the compounds that are being marketed by some of the companies, but Patrick Arnold is trying to use his fancy vocabulary and an array of cut and paste literature to try and skew us from the matter at hand. Most of the consumers of these companies come to get information from this very reputable site... and we all know that word of mouth is the best form of advertisement... it's also the most bludgeoning form of destruction. Patrick isn't into helping people unless it helps himself. All he does here is cause trouble. He's earned his respect a while ago before tearing it down with his criminal instances (and there's more than meets the eye about that) and now his company just isn't very good at keeping up with the rest of the innovators in the market. What can one do if they can't put out something better? Rip down something that's already decent by skewing data and trying to INTERPRET THE ANALYSIS for us and give it all to us in LAY terms... just how we like it.
The data I found on 6-alpha bromo androstenedione and 6-beta bromo androstenedione are quite different than what Patrick is putting forth.
6-Bromo is a perfectly functional steroidal... yes steroidal aromatase inhibitor, whether it be in alpha or beta molecular form. It reminds me a lot like formestane, which I think is a Godsend, although some may disagree. In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.
6-bromo is the base AI of many different products and has sufficient research to back it up, so please don't allow Patrick Arnold's comments be the reason that you pass off negative feedback on a product or don't take the product. It's only allowing him to win. What really sucks is that Patrick uses his authority to present facts and such in ways that appeal even to the intelligent consumer and then when he has you hooked into his views and in his graces, he'll throw a change up and have you believing something that isn't. The only dish PA is serving is a bunch of s**t sandwiches. You may eat it, but after you chew on it, you're not going to like it.
1,2-beta methyleneI'm kind of surprised that many have not tried researching these compounds themselves. I'd just like to state, as a neutral member here at AM, it's been an awesome pleasure to be actively posting here at Anabolicminds.com. Whether I've had concurrent or conflicting views with all of you members and board sponsors, I really like all of you. I don't sponsor nor do I receive bonuses or products from any company. I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. His lies and treacheries have wreaked havoc on the industry that we are sponsoring and have brought a lot of negative connotations to the athletic communities. This isn't what I'm trying to say... I believe that there may be more to learn on some of the compounds that are being marketed by some of the companies, but Patrick Arnold is trying to use his fancy vocabulary and an array of cut and paste literature to try and skew us from the matter at hand. Most of the consumers of these companies come to get information from this very reputable site... and we all know that word of mouth is the best form of advertisement... it's also the most bludgeoning form of destruction. Patrick isn't into helping people unless it helps himself. All he does here is cause trouble. He's earned his respect a while ago before tearing it down with his criminal instances (and there's more than meets the eye about that) and now his company just isn't very good at keeping up with the rest of the innovators in the market. What can one do if they can't put out something better? Rip down something that's already decent by skewing data and trying to INTERPRET THE ANALYSIS for us and give it all to us in LAY terms... just how we like it.
The data I found on 6-alpha bromo androstenedione and 6-beta bromo androstenedione are quite different than what Patrick is putting forth.
6-Bromo is a perfectly functional steroidal... yes steroidal aromatase inhibitor, whether it be in alpha or beta molecular form. It reminds me a lot like formestane, which I think is a Godsend, although some may disagree. In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.
6-bromo is the base AI of many different products and has sufficient research to back it up, so please don't allow Patrick Arnold's comments be the reason that you pass off negative feedback on a product or don't take the product. It's only allowing him to win. What really sucks is that Patrick uses his authority to present facts and such in ways that appeal even to the intelligent consumer and then when he has you hooked into his views and in his graces, he'll throw a change up and have you believing something that isn't. The only dish PA is serving is a bunch of s**t sandwiches. You may eat it, but after you chew on it, you're not going to like it.
no, i got off of house arrest may 7thI'm kind of surprised that many have not tried researching these compounds themselves. I'd just like to state, as a neutral member here at AM, it's been an awesome pleasure to be actively posting here at Anabolicminds.com. Whether I've had concurrent or conflicting views with all of you members and board sponsors, I really like all of you. I don't sponsor nor do I receive bonuses or products from any company. I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. .
Agreed but a bit of a low blow as well. If you are going to use the felon angle, then I can think of a few others in this category that use similar marketing tactics.I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. His lies and treacheries have wreaked havoc on the industry that we are sponsoring and have brought a lot of negative connotations to the athletic communities.
Agreed but a bit of a low blow as well. If you are going to use the felon angle, then I can think of a few others in this category that use similar marketing tactics.
Beware of Companies that attack others products as thier marketing tool. Take a look around and you will see this is very common with a few competitors as they lose market share.
I have no issues with true debates, but I can almost guess what Patricks next topic of discussion will be, and since it's not found in any of his products, I'm sure he is just looking out for the consumers best interest.
I'm kind of surprised that many have not tried researching these compounds themselves. I'd just like to state, as a neutral member here at AM, it's been an awesome pleasure to be actively posting here at Anabolicminds.com. Whether I've had concurrent or conflicting views with all of you members and board sponsors, I really like all of you. I don't sponsor nor do I receive bonuses or products from any company. I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. His lies and treacheries have wreaked havoc on the industry that we are sponsoring and have brought a lot of negative connotations to the athletic communities. This isn't what I'm trying to say... I believe that there may be more to learn on some of the compounds that are being marketed by some of the companies, but Patrick Arnold is trying to use his fancy vocabulary and an array of cut and paste literature to try and skew us from the matter at hand. Most of the consumers of these companies come to get information from this very reputable site... and we all know that word of mouth is the best form of advertisement... it's also the most bludgeoning form of destruction. Patrick isn't into helping people unless it helps himself. All he does here is cause trouble. He's earned his respect a while ago before tearing it down with his criminal instances (and there's more than meets the eye about that) and now his company just isn't very good at keeping up with the rest of the innovators in the market. What can one do if they can't put out something better? Rip down something that's already decent by skewing data and trying to INTERPRET THE ANALYSIS for us and give it all to us in LAY terms... just how we like it.
The data I found on 6-alpha bromo androstenedione and 6-beta bromo androstenedione are quite different than what Patrick is putting forth.
6-Bromo is a perfectly functional steroidal... yes steroidal aromatase inhibitor, whether it be in alpha or beta molecular form. It reminds me a lot like formestane, which I think is a Godsend, although some may disagree. In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.
6-bromo is the base AI of many different products and has sufficient research to back it up, so please don't allow Patrick Arnold's comments be the reason that you pass off negative feedback on a product or don't take the product. It's only allowing him to win. What really sucks is that Patrick uses his authority to present facts and such in ways that appeal even to the intelligent consumer and then when he has you hooked into his views and in his graces, he'll throw a change up and have you believing something that isn't. The only dish PA is serving is a bunch of s**t sandwiches. You may eat it, but after you chew on it, you're not going to like it.
He's earned his respect a while ago before tearing it down with his criminal instances (and there's more than meets the eye about that).
6-bromo is the base AI of many different products and has sufficient research to back it up, so please don't allow Patrick Arnold's comments be the reason that you pass off negative feedback on a product or don't take the product. It's only allowing him to win. What really sucks is that Patrick uses his authority to present facts and such in ways that appeal even to the intelligent consumer and then when he has you hooked into his views and in his graces, he'll throw a change up and have you believing something that isn't. The only dish PA is serving is a bunch of s**t sandwiches. You may eat it, but after you chew on it, you're not going to like it.
I'm kind of surprised that many have not tried researching these compounds themselves. I'd just like to state, as a neutral member here at AM, it's been an awesome pleasure to be actively posting here at Anabolicminds.com. Whether I've had concurrent or conflicting views with all of you members and board sponsors, I really like all of you. I don't sponsor nor do I receive bonuses or products from any company. I urge all of you to step back for a moment and please think about what is being said by Patrick Arnold and where he's coming from. The guy is obviously a smart man. One can say that he's 'The Man' in terms of steroids, etc. He's also bored as hell on house arrest and is a convicted felon. His lies and treacheries have wreaked havoc on the industry that we are sponsoring and have brought a lot of negative connotations to the athletic communities. This isn't what I'm trying to say... I believe that there may be more to learn on some of the compounds that are being marketed by some of the companies, but Patrick Arnold is trying to use his fancy vocabulary and an array of cut and paste literature to try and skew us from the matter at hand. Most of the consumers of these companies come to get information from this very reputable site... and we all know that word of mouth is the best form of advertisement... it's also the most bludgeoning form of destruction. Patrick isn't into helping people unless it helps himself. All he does here is cause trouble. He's earned his respect a while ago before tearing it down with his criminal instances (and there's more than meets the eye about that) and now his company just isn't very good at keeping up with the rest of the innovators in the market. What can one do if they can't put out something better? Rip down something that's already decent by skewing data and trying to INTERPRET THE ANALYSIS for us and give it all to us in LAY terms... just how we like it.
The data I found on 6-alpha bromo androstenedione and 6-beta bromo androstenedione are quite different than what Patrick is putting forth.
6-Bromo is a perfectly functional steroidal... yes steroidal aromatase inhibitor, whether it be in alpha or beta molecular form. It reminds me a lot like formestane, which I think is a Godsend, although some may disagree. In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.
6-bromo is the base AI of many different products and has sufficient research to back it up, so please don't allow Patrick Arnold's comments be the reason that you pass off negative feedback on a product or don't take the product. It's only allowing him to win. What really sucks is that Patrick uses his authority to present facts and such in ways that appeal even to the intelligent consumer and then when he has you hooked into his views and in his graces, he'll throw a change up and have you believing something that isn't. The only dish PA is serving is a bunch of s**t sandwiches. You may eat it, but after you chew on it, you're not going to like it.
Originally posted by Patrick Arnold:
we all know its an aromatase inhibitor thank you
stay on topic
are these those sh*t sandwiches he's feeding you?Originally posted by Patrick Arnold:
i don't necessarily disagree with you however it certainly is NOT the best choice for testicular recovery
for testicular recovery you need a pure anti-estrogen product with no competing HPTA inhibitor androgenic action
much like with formestane
Do we have any numbers showing a good increase in Test from this? I have never seen a before and after bloodtest done w/6-Bromo standalone.In reccommended doses, 6-bromo will suppress estrogen enough to allow for the body's natural testosterone stimulation to jumpstart and minimize estrogen related side effects in tissues.
Yes, 6-bromoandrostenedione is very analagous to 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (formestane)Do we have any numbers showing a good increase in Test from this? I have never seen a before and after bloodtest done w/6-Bromo standalone.
If this product is like Formestane than it is in a whole different category and not the best for post cycle therapy. Good standalone or during a cycle though.
You said formestane, and thus 6-bromo, are very highly likely precursors to androgens, but the conclusion to what you cited is that formestane does not significantly change androgen levels.Yes, 6-bromoandrostenedione is very analagous to 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (formestane)
Both are aromatase inhibitors. and both are substituted androstenediones that are (very highly likely) precursors to active androgens
There is not alot on the effects of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione on testosterone levels in men but what is in the literature supports the argument that the compound does not have HPTA stimulatory activity
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993 Sep;46(3):373-9. Links
Pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione in man after intramuscular injection of different formulations and the effect of this drug on plasma aromatizable androgens and 17beta-estradiol concentrations.
Danza G, Muratori M, Guarna A, Occhiato EG, Sadri R, Serio M.
Clinical Physiopathology Department, University of Firenze, Italy.
Pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), a potent aromatase inhibitor under investigation for treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer, were studied using two formulations with different particle sizes of 4.2 and 8.0 microm, respectively. A single 250 mg dose of 4-OHA of each of the two formulations was administered in two different periods to six healthy male volunteers and blood samples were collected for up to 14 days. 4-OHA plasma levels were determined using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry method. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two formulations did not show any statistically significant difference, even though the 4.2 microm particle size gave apparently higher levels at 24 h. Using this formulation, the effects of 4-OHA on the plasma levels of aromatizable androgens (testosterone and androstenedione) and 17beta-estradiol were studied. An isotope dilution mass spectrometry method was developed for the simultaneous quantitative determination of these steroids in human plasma. The analysis of plasma samples showed a significant reduction of plasma estradiol concentrations (50%) which coincided with the maximum concentration peak of the inhibitor, whereas no significant changes in androgen levels were observed.
PMID: 9831486 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
:toofunny:I really think a lot of people on this forum are extremely jealous of PA's brilliance.
nuff' said.
lol I laughed at my ownself when i posted that, I'm assuming i'm going to get flamed here... but it's cool.Actually it is his arrogance and condescending tone, that people take offense by. I really don't think people are going to hate him because he brilliant. This isn't elementary school.
I like his contributions to AM, no matter what the intent is because I think a lot of peeps just start popping pills without asking what is this suppose to do for me.
This is why I like to get involved here. The ignorance about supplements is astonishing and some people would be surprised to learn that what they're taking isn't the healthiest choice. I'm not talking at all about this one in particular, but there's lots of dangerous/unhealthy combinations of things that people need to be aware of.I like his contributions to AM, no matter what the intent is because I think a lot of peeps just start popping pills without asking what is this suppose to do for me.
No ,actually you should doble the dose of percocets and why a case of beer? why not everclear or bacardi 151 ?I pop like 40 percocets as soon as i get out of bed and down a case of beer by 9 am.
Is this unhealthy for me?
It's not necessary to bring up past mistakes or current interests in an attempt to discredit someone. It's a bleak perspective on life, to judge a person today for their actions of yesterday, assuming that they can't change. You don't have to like the person, you don't have to listen, and you certainly shouldn't just take any one person's word for the truth. But change is possible and the assumptions that some are making only serve to vent their personal frustration and discontent. It distracts from those looking for the truth, and more than likely only puts the opposing person in a foul mood. Change is possible, and you can't remain angry forever at someone for things they did before or for assumptions that you're now making about them. It's not healthy. It's equally bad to misplace your frustration, like putting it into these forums, so just let it go. It's not necessary.
No disclaimer, this is how I feel and it's disconcerting for me to see these things from anyone that I expect to look to for information and advice, which should include everyone in this community.
you missed the part of the study which stated which hormones (androgens) they were looking for. they were not looking for 4-hydroxytestosterone (which is what you apparently are thinking here)You said formestane, and thus 6-bromo, are very highly likely precursors to androgens, but the conclusion to what you cited is that formestane does not significantly change androgen levels.
This means that formestane has no HPTA stimulation activity, but why wouldn't it also indicate that it does not convert into an androgen. If it did, wouldn't the results have shown elevated androgens (which would have been from direct conversion or from HPTA stimulation)? And from that, it would mean 6-bromo is not likely to be a precursor to an androgen and also not good for HPTA stimulation because it's similar.
:toofunny:
Actually it is his arrogance and condescending tone, that people take offense by.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
6 Bromodione question? | Post Cycle Therapy | 3 | ||
6-Bromodione help please!! | Supplements | 1 | ||
6-Bromodione | Supplements | 3 | ||
6-bromodione, suppressive or not? | Anabolics | 30 | ||
Side effects of using 6-Bromodione?? | Supplements | 1 |