Guest viewing is limited

Why Prohormones?

Dma378 said:
Not to discredit anyone's reason for not doing one or the other, but most of the demands required in these posts can be found and received by many ugl. Just like anything else, a bit of research can shed light on many concerns.

I would say in my experience, the biggest concern with buying AAS from ugl is potency. Most will at least have a considerable amount of hormone in them. Trust me they want your business again, just like any other supplement company. But you will find from lab to lab the same products will be stronger or weaker. The same can be said for supplement/ph companies.
Click to expand...

This.
 
bert45 said:
Obviously. But they still sell and market them as phs. I understand your trying your hardest to be politically correct.
Click to expand...

On a completely unrelated note, your avatar enrages me. Hahaha I hate that old man mask for some reason.
 
afluck410 said:
With PH's/ designer steroids, there's a company behind the pill your popping and there are reviews to weed out the fakes
Click to expand...
plenty of OTC manufacturers selling bogus, impure and or illegally tainted compounds. An anonymous stranger reviewing a product does not confirm its content or purity.
 
carmaf said:
Yeah that was my understanding what a PH was. Now I am confused thanks to jbryand101b
Click to expand...


A PH or Prohormone is a precursor hormone that converts to an active steroid. Many today, like the DHEA precursors, have two step conversions to active steroids. Some precursors have intrinsic anabolic properties of there own but are usually of little significance.

The issue of greatest concern IMHO is every time it converts is also has undesirable properties such as estrogen and prolactin making them inefficient and ineffective after the net desired compound is finally achieved.

A designer steroid is simply a steroid that is an active steroid requiring no conversion.
 
David Dunn said:
A PH or Prohormone is a precursor hormone that converts to an active steroid. Many today, like the DHEA precursors, have two step conversions to active steroids. Some precursors have intrinsic anabolic properties of there own but are usually of little significance.

The issue of greatest concern IMHO is every time it converts is also has undesirable properties such as estrogen and prolactin making them inefficient and ineffective after the net desired compound is finally achieved.

A designer steroid is simply a steroid that is an active steroid requiring no conversion.
Click to expand...

Exactly what I said, just less technical.

They're all androgenic steroidial hormones, except for the SARMS
 
Why Ph's and no AAS?

Lack of flexibility, can't twist enough to stick a needle in my butt.
 
hairygrandpa said:
Why Ph's and no AAS?

Lack of flexibility, can't twist enough to stick a needle in my butt.
Click to expand...

What if you get someone else to do it while you look away, once again, a la Jose Canseco?
 
anab0lix said:
Current living situation. Impossible to have needles and vials around.
Click to expand...

I'm not too familiar with gear but do people still take pills, or is that too awful for your liver? Is needles pretty much the standard for Steroids/GH?
 
carmaf said:
I'm not too familiar with gear but do people still take pills, or is that too awful for your liver? Is needles pretty much the standard for Steroids/GH?
Click to expand...

Tabs capsules gels injections
Depends what "pills" your taking some are worse for your liver then others small example is M1T compared to Anavar

Or anadrol and primo
 
carmaf said:
I'm not too familiar with gear but do people still take pills, or is that too awful for your liver? Is needles pretty much the standard for Steroids/GH?
Click to expand...
No people definitely still run oral only cycles still. Also transdermal products. Stacked with orals as well.
 
carmaf said:
I'm not too familiar with gear but do people still take pills, or is that too awful for your liver? Is needles pretty much the standard for Steroids/GH?
Click to expand...

Oral steroids are rough. Injectable is way more safe.
Orals are usually used as kickers
 
jbryand101b said:
Eh, I disagree, they both have their pros an cons. IMO way more safe isn't on the list.
Click to expand...

That's fair. I guess I meant injectables are a lot easier on the liver and can provide more sustainable gains
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top