Fzisn1
New member
- Awards
- 0
Anybody know?
Roger. But why do people categorize it as a SARM?It's a selective agonist (activator) of the PPARδ receptor
Please elaborateA better question is why anyone considers taking it at all
ConfusedA better question is why anyone considers taking it at all
Youre not the first person to bring this up bro. Its been debunked. GW is good to goSomething something insane toxicity in animal studies?
What are you talking about bro???? It's perfectly normal to give rats doses that are 2x what you'd give to a human in the 1st study and call it hazardous even though 2 more rat studies were g2g and several human trials.Youre not the first person to bring this up bro. Its been debunked. GW is good to go
LolWhat are you talking about bro???? It's perfectly normal to give rats doses that are 2x what you'd give to a human in the 1st study and call it hazardous even though 2 more rat studies were g2g and several human trials.
I wasnt laughing at you bro.. I understand why there would be some concern, but if you look at the study it was ridiculous. Basically it was like giving a human 2000mg a day. The recommended dose is 20mg.Sure thing.
I'm sure GSK abandoned the ingredient for no reason at all and ate the big r&d loss over nothing.
Clearly no risks at all.
Carry on then.
I get it. And realistically, you're probably right. It's probably much ado about nothing.I wasnt laughing at you bro.. I understand why there would be some concern, but if you look at the study it was ridiculous. Basically it was like giving a human 2000mg a day. The recommended dose is 20mg.
Like what? I like it because it is not muscularly catabolic, honestly.I get it. And realistically, you're probably right. It's probably much ado about nothing.
I just don't understand why people would spend as much money as they do on abandoned pharmaceutical compounds on the grey market. When if you're willing to use illegal substances, there's WAY more effective products to be had for cheaper.
Its always about money man.. whether its favorable for us as the people or notI get it. And realistically, you're probably right. It's probably much ado about nothing.
I just don't understand why people would spend as much money as they do on abandoned pharmaceutical compounds on the grey market. When if you're willing to use illegal substances, there's WAY more effective products to be had for cheaper.
Dont forget about eugenics either.Its always about money man.. whether its favorable for us as the people or not
My guess would be just for sake of convenience.Roger. But why do people categorize it as a SARM?
^this^My guess would be just for sake of convenience.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Is it okay to use Cardarine (501516) during an OTC PCT? | Supplement Companies | 28 | ||
Any interest in a GW-501516 & GW-0742 combo? | Peptide/Research | 14 | ||
GW-501516 the magic bullet for fat loss... | MA Labs | 13 | ||
Sarm Stack MK2866+LGD4044+GW501516 | Peptide/Research | 8 | ||
MA Labs GW-501516 | MA Labs | 0 |