Guest viewing is limited

When the boss is away.......(CONTEST)

Status
Not open for further replies.
satire thats what he said, they are smashing atoms,

I am a high energy physicist, do not purpose to talk to me about smashing atoms sir!

Smashing atoms yields no useful calculatory mechnanics. Physically you have a semi-chaotic nuclear reaction with jet effects in calabi yao space, with lots of j-psi particle fun. Basically you get lots of quarks and gluons spitting off, combining and decaying to other particles in cascades.

You don't do computation with this...
 
Damn, I gotta change my avatar, it gets me all warm everytime I see it, plus my girl comes home tomorrow, so can't let her see that!
 
myth i am going to post picture of your girl as my avator, its already on my laptop, hehe, hey did you see teh show shedid with mexican last saturday it was on webcam, lol
 
i know nothing about smashing atoms or high program computers, all i know is he told us this two weeks ago after he went to some convention, he likes to stick his chest out, i have no idea if half the stuff he says is true or not
 
we use to be technology advanced, but we investing to much money into war and other things and not into technology, he said he was on a board of 7 students, and went to china to do some internship and was talking about how china is the top dog

Have you not been paying attention to all the new awesome technology we've been throwing into Iraq? We have a bomb now that can take out 4 football fields worth of tanks in 1 drop. 4 of these suckers on a F18 or F22 could take out an entire armored battalion. These use advanced laser and heat sensing semiconductors along with parabolic orbit mechanics for maximum visibility of the sensor arrays.

Or the new raptor drones that can carry over a ton of ordanance and put no humans in jeopardy. Or the mesh fabric p2p real time radio / digital communications system that gives every target operator a real time view of everyone elses combined data synergized on their tactical heads up displays in real time. Or...

Dude, war spending is going into some really amazing R&D. Some of the greatest advances in computing technology and technolgy in general came out of WWII, Vietnam, and the Cold War.

Do not blame war for stagnation. Blame stock holders and stupid ass women running companies like HP who kill their labs.
 
i know nothing about smashing atoms or high program computers, all i know is he told us this two weeks ago after he went to some convention, he likes to stick his chest out, i have no idea if half the stuff he says is true or not

Dude if he wasn't presenting research, you could have attended too... Any pedestrian off the street can walk into research conventions and sit down.
 
satire i agree the new technologies from war, its just we are dropping to china and otehr countries in science and new discoveries, we are more into sports and making money then what matters,
 
Have you not been paying attention to all the new awesome technology we've been throwing into Iraq? We have a bomb now that can take out 4 football fields worth of tanks in 1 drop. 4 of these suckers on a F18 or F22 could take out an entire armored battalion. These use advanced laser and heat sensing semiconductors along with parabolic orbit mechanics for maximum visibility of the sensor arrays.

Or the new raptor drones that can carry over a ton of ordanance and put no humans in jeopardy. Or the mesh fabric p2p real time radio / digital communications system that gives every target operator a real time view of everyone elses combined data synergized on their tactical heads up displays in real time. Or...

Dude, war spending is going into some really amazing R&D. Some of the greatest advances in computing technology and technolgy in general came out of WWII, Vietnam, and the Cold War.

Do not blame war for stagnation. Blame stock holders and stupid ass women running companies like HP who kill their labs.

Invalid Link Removed
 
like he told us the importance of bees, and how they are starting to die and not as many bee farms as last year, and if we cant start finding more bee farms it could hurt economy because alot of foods and vegetables are dependent onhoney
 
i am a big discovery channel and i love watching show future weapons but i disagree withthem putting it on tv to let other countries and terrosist see so they can produce it also
 
satire i agree the new technologies from war, its just we are dropping to china and otehr countries in science and new discoveries, we are more into sports and making money then what matters,

I agree with the making money part. Sometimes I wish I could have been born in the good old times of hunter-gatherer situations.
 
Well some students tonite are doing a get together to help each other out so hopefully il make an a, but after i do the work is there aw ay you can check it, its only 10-12 questions, thanks anyway
 
like he told us the importance of bees, and how they are starting to die and not as many bee farms as last year, and if we cant start finding more bee farms it could hurt economy because alot of foods and vegetables are dependent onhoney

anyone reading slashdot would've known about bees dying, but it's not a wide spread epidemic 'yet'. It's probably a disease that's killing out alot of the honey bees due to our lack of bio-diversity in using the exact same optimal honey producing bees for everything. I'm sure some disease resistant bee's will survive and repopulate.

Just like every time a species dies, another one takes its place. Animals adapt, or die, humans are the same. We'll adapt or we'll die.
 
bitter and satire is it posible for after i am done for yal to check over it so maybe i can get an a. and hush teacher up, if not i appreciate for help already
 
i am a big discovery channel and i love watching show future weapons but i disagree withthem putting it on tv to let other countries and terrosist see so they can produce it also

Dude, you don't get to see all the REALLY cool stuff in developed by skunk works. That stuff gets line itemed in at billions a year and not even congress knows what's being designed and researched. If it's on the discovery channel, I guarantee china and everyone else knew about it a decade ago, or at least a looong time before it made TV news.
 
Hey, we all have our flaws. Actually, wouldn't it be really ironic if Wand was romantic?

Hey Rodja, hope all is well with you. I did some Boxing the other day on the heavy bag. Im a hard hitter=) I wrapped and tryed the explosivive technique you recommend. Man I punched hard.

Thats where you get the power the heavy bag.. rocky Marciano did this often
 
something we did i believe is make a item go at the speed of light around the world backwards or forwards it takes 100 years to do that and then youd be 2 million years infuture i believe
 
what i find interesting is going into the future, einstein proved it was true, it will be cool when a human can actually do that

Yes, if time is a dimension, it may be possible to travel through it. What's more interesting is that you can conceptualize up to 10 dimensions and actually it might be possible to travel to another universal timeline where you are a filthy rich or whatever your wildest fantasies are.
 
its crazy how einstein and these other genius came up with so much information and in the last ten years or so no big discoveries like all thethings he did, and rutherford and such
 
its crazy how einstein and these other genius came up with so much information and in the last ten years or so no big discoveries like all thethings he did, and rutherford and such

Last year, Mallett published a paper describing how a circulating beam of laser light would create a vortex in space within its circle (Physics Letters A, vol 269, p 214). Then he had a eureka moment. "I realised that time, as well as space, might be twisted by circulating light beams," Mallett says.

To twist time into a loop, Mallett worked out that he would have to add a second light beam, circulating in the opposite direction. Then if you increase the intensity of the light enough, space and time swap roles: inside the circulating light beam, time runs round and round, while what to an outsider looks like time becomes like an ordinary dimension of space.

A person walking along in the right direction could actually be walking backwards in time -- as measured outside the circle. So after walking for a while, you could leave the circle and meet yourself before you have entered it.
 
bitter thats crazy, what im trying to say is there are alot of discoveries, just weird how the people did it in the old days with fair less technology
 
what i find interesting is going into the future, einstein proved it was true, it will be cool when a human can actually do that

Dude Einstein theorized a hell of a lot and proved little to none of his work. I think you should stop talking about any hard science, because you are generalizing and talking about things second hand of which you have no comprehension or understanding.

No offense, but Einstein stated that matter could not be created nor destroyed, but he also did not believe in the idea of simultaneity. Meaning that two actions happening at a distance with no direct interaction could in fact have equal and opposite reactions through spintronics. The idea of information transmission in the t/pt dimensions is through simultaneity/spintronics. Meaning, no useful matter can be transmitted or information that which is not already known in the future verse. All this says is that if we were to rig an experiment were we did the same quantum operation on the exact same particle in two separate times, there's a chance that it would react from the simultaneous experimentation. But that would pre-suppose knowing about the future experiment in the past.

It's a paradox, and Einstein came up with lots of them. They're just brain twisters, nothing more.

Einstein did not believe in time travel. If your chemist prof seems to think so, he's full of ****.

IE, he's full of himself and thinks highly of himself because he works at a community college, but all the while, he's a complete and utter ideot, because those that do DO, those that can't, teach.

If he had half a brain he'd be doing research at a major university.
 
Dude Einstein theorized a hell of a lot and proved little to none of his work. I think you should stop talking about any hard science, because you are generalizing and talking about things second hand of which you have no comprehension or understanding.

No offense, but Einstein stated that matter could not be created nor destroyed, but he also did not believe in the idea of simultaneity. Meaning that two actions happening at a distance with no direct interaction could in fact have equal and opposite reactions through spintronics. The idea of information transmission in the t/pt dimensions is through simultaneity/spintronics. Meaning, no useful matter can be transmitted or information that which is not already known in the future verse. All this says is that if we were to rig an experiment were we did the same quantum operation on the exact same particle in two separate times, there's a chance that it would react from the simultaneous experimentation. But that would pre-suppose knowing about the future experiment in the past.

It's a paradox, and Einstein came up with lots of them. They're just brain twisters, nothing more.

Einstein did not believe in time travel. If your chemist prof seems to think so, he's full of ****.

IE, he's full of himself and thinks highly of himself because he works at a community college, but all the while, he's a complete and utter ideot, because those that do DO, those that can't, teach.

If he had half a brain he'd be doing research at a major university.

If he had a full brain he'd be in the private sector.
 
Last year, Mallett published a paper describing how a circulating beam of laser light would create a vortex in space within its circle (Physics Letters A, vol 269, p 214). Then he had a eureka moment. "I realised that time, as well as space, might be twisted by circulating light beams," Mallett says.

To twist time into a loop, Mallett worked out that he would have to add a second light beam, circulating in the opposite direction. Then if you increase the intensity of the light enough, space and time swap roles: inside the circulating light beam, time runs round and round, while what to an outsider looks like time becomes like an ordinary dimension of space.

A person walking along in the right direction could actually be walking backwards in time -- as measured outside the circle. So after walking for a while, you could leave the circle and meet yourself before you have entered it.

This is presupposing a non-relativistic entry and exit. The problem is that you cannot enter nor exit the space without disrupting and destroying the space that has been created.

I guess if you popped out of the quantum vacuum this would be sane, but you're not a quantum dot.
 
Yes, if time is a dimension, it may be possible to travel through it. What's more interesting is that you can conceptualize up to 10 dimensions and actually it might be possible to travel to another universal timeline where you are a filthy rich or whatever your wildest fantasies are.

String theory is a load of unprovable crap. You'd need a particle accelerator the size of half the universe to detect a string.
 
String theory is a load of unprovable crap. You'd need a particle accelerator the size of half the universe to detect a string.

Not to mention the fact that the magic number (ie the tension on the string) is required to make all the other particles 'appear', and you can't get that number without detecting a string, which you need a half-universe size supercollider to find.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top