jjjd
Active member
Vanilla Gorilla, I agree completely. And I am not slagging IA's routines. for all i know, they are beyond the valley of brilliant (tm). however, you simply cannot see linear progression repeatedly over time. and some posters here seem to think that this is going to be a guage of an effective routines, or more importantly, that if one DOES NOT see incremental gains workout to workout, that something is wrong, or one is "overtrained". fwiw, a good indication of overtraining is LOSS of strength - not stagnant strength levels, generally speaking. the body simply does not adapt that way. there is this myth (especially among HITTers I might add- and no i am not claiming anybody here is a HITTer) that recovery works in this way also. it does not. for example, if you worked chest on Friday and then do chest again 7 days later, a Hitter would claim this is good timing because you are completely recovered. well, recovery does not work that way. some adaptations occur over WEEKS, others - within minutes. and Doctor, as long as you are adding 5 lbs a workout - KEEP DOING it. just don't think it will last. that's not a problem with routines, or hardgainers or overtraining. it's simply a matter of adaptation and the body working at its own pace. I trained with OLers, for instance who would BUST ass day after day, week after week, and since they were at such a high level, they might not even see a 2.5 kilo increase for a month or two or more. then, BOOM - increase. all at once.
and dave tate makes some really good points. as you get closer to your (theoretical) "limit", it becomes harder and harder to make gains.
and JMweave, if you think you are FULLY recovered from a workout, a week later, you are not. that is the fallacy behind much of the HIT/Hardgainer etc. philosophies. in some respects, you are still seeing a training effect and adaptation - a week later. workout are like pulses and you are trying to raise the baseline by continuing to pulse and seeing an overall upward trend.
the vast majority of the most successful strength athletes do not train any sort of protocol that is based upon so called complete recovery - not the bulgarians, the Poles, or most powerlifting programs. it is neither necessary, or frankly - even possible to train that way. whether for strength or hypertrophy.
and dave tate makes some really good points. as you get closer to your (theoretical) "limit", it becomes harder and harder to make gains.
and JMweave, if you think you are FULLY recovered from a workout, a week later, you are not. that is the fallacy behind much of the HIT/Hardgainer etc. philosophies. in some respects, you are still seeing a training effect and adaptation - a week later. workout are like pulses and you are trying to raise the baseline by continuing to pulse and seeing an overall upward trend.
the vast majority of the most successful strength athletes do not train any sort of protocol that is based upon so called complete recovery - not the bulgarians, the Poles, or most powerlifting programs. it is neither necessary, or frankly - even possible to train that way. whether for strength or hypertrophy.