Guest viewing is limited

turanabol

Fuego

Fuego

New member
Awright, so I've been looking at many steroid profiles and know alot of people who're using alot of different roids, and they, as well as me, agree that turanabol is a great steroid in the regards to sides and gives lean gains.

So I was thinking what would be the next step on the ladder for something with even greater effect/potency, and also having few gains. Primo, var or something like that. But the thought hit me, why not just increase the dosage of tbol if you'd want even greater results.

I guess that'd still be quite safe in regards of sides?
Have anyone run cycles of tbol with higher dosage than 40-50mg ED? And how were your results? gains vs sides
 
turinabol has to be run just as high as anavar IF NOT MORE. most ppl run tbol 60-100mg ED. u also need test as a base of the cycle
 
nosnmiveins said:
turinabol has to be run just as high as anavar IF NOT MORE. most ppl run tbol 60-100mg ED. u also need test as a base of the cycle
Click to expand...

Yea, I've heard that. However, I know alot of people that've used it as standalone and gotten good results from it. but bro, 60-100mg? that's a sh*tload=O

The guy I'm buying from suggested only 40mg ED for 6 weeks. I was thinking 50mg myself though.
 
40 is the lowest i would ever run tbol. i usualy run it at 60. ive gone up to 100 and noticed it kinda is a waste after 80mg, it is very dry although at doses past 80 i tend to look smoothers. i would be comfortable suggesting 40-60mg for 6 weeks.
 
yea something like that. i never used it alone tho, so i cant comment on how its going to effect his libido and energy.
 
i just called a friend who has ran tbol solo before, he said u need more than 50mg to notice much of anything, also said he had increased libido, hunger, and would get tired randomly throughout the day. he used it at 80mg for 8 weeks, but hes also special.
 
nephilim666 said:
i just called a friend who has ran tbol solo before, he said u need more than 50mg to notice much of anything, also said he had increased libido, hunger, and would get tired randomly throughout the day. he used it at 80mg for 8 weeks, but hes also special.
Click to expand...

hehe, special in what regard?=P

Awright. increased hunger is excellent. Hard on the wallet though, but definitely a good trait. I've gone up 5lbs during 6 weeks just by upping overall food intake, so having tbol in addition would be excellent. And as it increases libido, then proviron won't be necessary=P

What exactly were his gains?
 
hes like 270 at the moment, when he ran this it was inbetween cycles so i dont think he gained any weight. i think he used it for a recomp. i do remember when he was on it becuase his vascularity was pronounced and his strength was steady coming off the cycle.
 
i know this is going to go into one eye and leave throughout the other one and you probably won't pay attention but i'll tell you anyway.

running any oral standalone is going to make it hard to keep gains post-cycle.
 
ibanezman08 said:
i know this is going to go into one eye and leave throughout the other one and you probably won't pay attention but i'll tell you anyway.

running any oral standalone is going to make it hard to keep gains post-cycle.
Click to expand...

I didn't know. I've run 1-AD and later 1-T, and later epi. Which have all been oral standalones=P And I've kept alot of the gains I've made. So I guess it'll be even easier to keep em if I stacked and pinned=)
 
mooch2321 said:
bad boys..bad boys...whatcha gonna do...

well the test base police might not come and get you but the "e.d. army" will nuke your ass for sure!:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Makes sense if you are taking something that is weak or converts to weak 5-alpha metabolites (like nandrolone) but if you are taking a strong androgen or something that converts to potent 5-alpha metabs, your libido should not decrease. I'm not a big fan of these catch-all "unbreakable rules".
 
nephilim666 said:
t-bol is a very very weak androgen.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say very very weak but probably weak enough to warrent some additional androgen. In this case it is probably appropriate -- I just object to the instant parroting that comes in on any thread that you have to have test as a base in any cycle.
 
i hear ya seth, i have ran EQ as a base as well as tren in the past, it works and works well. test is just an easy base to run for most people i guess.
 
nephilim666 said:
i hear ya seth, i have ran EQ as a base as well as tren in the past, it works and works well. test is just an easy base to run for most people i guess.
Click to expand...

Those two are great choices -- after all, the whole point of AAS is to get away from the estrogen and DHT producing effects of test. Not that test is bad. Works great all by itself but it does have its issues too.
 
I ran tbol at 40mg and up to 70mg. 50-60mg was the sweet spot anything more than that was just a waste and brought on more sides. I ran it standalone also. The only thing i lost after PCT was the all day pumped look you get off of it. Tbol is great for nitrogen retention also.
 
Fuego said:
Awright, so I've been looking at many steroid profiles and know alot of people who're using alot of different roids, and they, as well as me, agree that turanabol is a great steroid in the regards to sides and gives lean gains.

So I was thinking what would be the next step on the ladder for something with even greater effect/potency, and also having few gains. Primo, var or something like that. But the thought hit me, why not just increase the dosage of tbol if you'd want even greater results.

I guess that'd still be quite safe in regards of sides?
Have anyone run cycles of tbol with higher dosage than 40-50mg ED? And how were your results? gains vs sides
Click to expand...


tbol is a great product you shouldnt need anymore then 50mg, I have gone as low as 20mg with great strength gains.
 
Fuego said:
Awright, but how were your gains in mass?
Click to expand...

My diet/training wasnt geared towards mass, but if mass is your number goal I would still say 40-50mg. I posted this before but will post again:

The East Germans approached the problem very differently. They developed a protocol based on the administration of 0.125 mg of Turinabol (an East German variant of Dianabol) per kilo of lean body mass. Their optimal dose was much smaller than the Russian dose and was implemented progressively over a number of years. In addition, they cycled the administration of the drug in order to preserve receptor affinity.The typical sprint protocol consisted of five blocks of administration annually. The first cycle started in November and ran for four weeks, followed by a two week break. The second cycle started in mid-December and ran for six weeks, followed by a four week indoor competition period in February. The third cycle started March 1st and ran for four weeks, followed by another two week break. The fourth cycle, also of four weeks, led into the first outdoor competition period which ran from mid-May to mid-June. The fifth and final cycle lasted six weeks and led to the main competition period of the year in August. If the main competition occurred at a different time, the entire season was adjusted accordingly.This system gave a total administration period of 24 weeks with the rest of the year off. The dosage


progressed throughout the year with the peak dose occurring during the final six-week block. As the doctors never determined an optimal time of day for steroids, they administered partial doses throughout the day to maintain an even level. This system maintained receptor affinity and, through a gradual increase in dosage, allowed top performances year after year.The maximum state-sanctioned dose recorded in the STASI files for a female sprinter was 1650 mg per year, an average of 9.8 mg/day during the administration period or, viewed another way, an average of 4.5 mg/day over the whole year. The maximum dose recorded for a male sprinter was 1850 mg/year, an average of 11 mg/day during the administration period, or an average of 5 mg/day over the whole year. While trivial by bodybuilding standards, it sure got the job done!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top