Thank you I think I will be trying your intra cycle product during my next 4 week cycle I do. Thanks for the help. I will dtart slow on the 30mg.
I want to try to put on some lean hard muscle i was thinking trenadrol or spawn with some fuz or winadrol any suggestions
X2 thats why I'm trying trenadrol cause Im changin my workout regiment for size/strength not lean muscle gains.
Thanks dkkon1 I'll try that. I'll def keep a log when I start. Should I stop taking my pre-workout (dominate by pride nutrition) during the cycle because its a stimulant?
X2 thats why I'm trying trenadrol cause Im changin my workout regiment for size/strength not lean muscle gains.
Thanks dkkon1 I'll try that. I'll def keep a log when I start. Should I stop taking my pre-workout (dominate by pride nutrition) during the cycle because its a stimulant?
Right now I'm going into day 6 of my trenadrol/M-drol cycle. I've lowered my trenadrol dose, but one thing is for sure, the strength gains on this thing are un-freaking-real. I always take it about an hour pre-workout, and by the time Im ready to hit the weights, I feel like I can lift a car. It's definitely a passing rush, that peaks right after I take the dose and kinda wanes enough at night that I can sleep. If I weren't limiting myself to a certain amount of sets or weight, I could see how someone could really hurt themselves by pushing themselves too far. I've definitely learned not to drink ANY caffeine with this because of the scary situation yesterday.
lol I have heard trenadrol is one of the fastest acting compounds out there, and seems to kick-in within a few days, with crazy strength gains
Yeah, I've always been a big fan of d-bol for strength, but trenadrol is really giving it a run for it's money. I might even consider running it during the first few weeks of a test cycle, it seems to be working that well.
Dienolone comparing to Dbol for strength? I never heard that one before.
Yeah I suppose it depends on gaols, as for mass there's no comparison. Dienolone(s) seem best for recomp, mostly every log/review I've seen yielded 4-7 lbs of muscle whereas with Dbol you can expect 3-4x this.
Yeah, that would be pretty fair if you were using it solo, but as a starter to an injectable, I think both have their benefits. I just don't remember the strength from dbol being nearly as explosive or quick to kick in as the trenadrol has so far.
Dienolone comparing to Dbol for strength? I never heard that one before.
Trenadrol isn't the same as Xtreme Tren etc. Kilo haven't been very honest about it tbh. They label it 17b-methoxy-trienbolone, they told me in an email its actually Estra 4,9. PA tested it, he said there was no Estra 4,9 in it. It had an MW of 270 (same as Trenbolone) but the other mins/max's didn't match up to Trenbolone. Someone who knows what it is but can't say because they are a rep for a rival company said it is not methylated (as there were guesses it had a low dose of methyltrienolone in it due to its characteristics being very similar). However they did say it had a methoxy bond attached to it, and it could cause prolactin induced gyno. They also said the nomenclature is not totally off.
So we have:
- MW = 270, but not regular tren
- Not methylated, but a methoxy bond
- Can cause prolactin inuced gyno
- 17b-methoxy-trienbolone isn't completely wrong
For those that are chemically inclined, could you have a structural modification on methyltrienolone, perhaps trienolone with a methoxy bond attached. Is this possible?
Thanks
Trenadrol is likely being banned with all the other 'Tren' & Dienolone compounds. It appears on 'blowout - all sales are final' lists everywhere along with the others slated for banning.
I know PA tested Methoxy-TRN in the past and mentioned what you're saying above in regards to its MW, but I haven't seen his tests on Trenadrol. Can you post the link to the test? I heard that a Kilo rep recently admitted it was Dienolone but am not sure on which board. The company originally stated the dose was 3mg, which would be along the same lines as Methoxy-TRN, but the bottle says 30mg as does all the ads now, wich would be standard Dienolone doses.
Ok found the daughters, quote. It was on DA, can I post the link or shoot you a PM???
PM away. Kilo's quite the interesting company, not sure if that's good or bad. I was searching & finally found something on BB where Pat was saying something about testing the original Methoxy-TRN (17bmethoxy-trenbolone) and I think he's confused. He tested the Kilo Tren a while back and said it looked just like the Estra-4,9 (dienolone) compounds. But I seen in the same thread from someone who used both said they 'felt' different.
PM sent, I have read anyway that 17b-methoxy-trienbolone isn't even a logical nomenclature, and IMO trenadrol looks great, like one of the best designers even but I would feel a bit iffy about using it considering I dont know what it is. I'm going to respond to the email Kilo sent me asking if it is indeed Estra 4,9 why is it not labelled Estra 4,9, doubt I will get a reply![]()
It's very shady. When your dealing with products that are in 'the grey area' already, why hide info? The comment from the Kilo rep who said it's "definitely methylated" is interesting. One of the guys from my old gym ran Trenadrol at the end of last year & after his post cycle blood work his liver values were WAY up compared to before.
His values went up more from his Trenadrol cycle than they did from his previous Halodrol cycle. The one thread where PA says when tested, it 'closely resembled Estra-4,9 (dienolone)' compounds makes me wonder if it could be the :banned: Methyl Dienolone, which is maybe why they're hiding the info. But who knows, just more speculation on my part.