TheUsual
Board Supporter
I'd like to know where the notion is coming from that T-Gel > AL's carrier (Customizing Gel, Penetrate, Dermabolics) ?
I'm not saying it isn't, but simply asking where this idea came from. Last I read on the topic, over at Avant Labs' forum, Par Deus stated that the T-Gel formula is good but should be on the same level as his own (i.e.-not a noticable difference in absorption). Granted one could call him biased, but he no longer makes any money off of these formulas and he is the undisputed king of transdermal delivery knowledge.
Anyways I just keep seeing the "T-Gel is better" thing flying around on this board and was wondering if it had any scientific backing or if it was simply because of a bias caused by T-Gel being Chemo's product.
If the absorption rates are the same, give me customizing gel or dermabolics any day. It is alot easier to dissolve powder in the liquid vs the gel and easier to apply with oral syringe for exact measurement.
I'm not saying it isn't, but simply asking where this idea came from. Last I read on the topic, over at Avant Labs' forum, Par Deus stated that the T-Gel formula is good but should be on the same level as his own (i.e.-not a noticable difference in absorption). Granted one could call him biased, but he no longer makes any money off of these formulas and he is the undisputed king of transdermal delivery knowledge.
Anyways I just keep seeing the "T-Gel is better" thing flying around on this board and was wondering if it had any scientific backing or if it was simply because of a bias caused by T-Gel being Chemo's product.
If the absorption rates are the same, give me customizing gel or dermabolics any day. It is alot easier to dissolve powder in the liquid vs the gel and easier to apply with oral syringe for exact measurement.