SuperDMZ 2.0 + 4-Andro

Using the 4Ad as a base to combat shutdown symptoms (lethargy, low libido etc)... I would reccomend a base if your thinking of running the sdmz 2.0.
 
^^^ Godstrength is right. Other than real test, 4 andro makes the best test base addition to a cycle. It helps keep energy levels high and adds to mass gains. 300-500mg is the effective range. It does increase the possibility of needing an AI on cycle though as it can aromatize.
 
Last edited:
It's just a luxury that people have, and people will pay for, so they're charging through the nose for it. They make their money off the stuff that combats the side effects, but the stuff that brings results. IMO, save some money and tough it out. 4-andro is not going to be worth it
 
Epiandro is also a Base. Hardrock has 60 Days at 300mg(?) for $60 IIRC. Down them with 250ml of Grapefruit Juice and some Olive Oil :) I wish someone made a solo TD or SubL Epi. Not applicable here, but there is a Tri-Dermal (did I just make that up?) of 1-Andro, 4-AD, and Epiandro for $180 for eight weeks. No idea if these are reasonable prices - I wasn't a purchaser during the DS/PH hey days.
 
Why does Constructs' chemical designation bring up Super 1-DHEA? But 75 mg's per tablet of SubL looks interesting. Appreciate the non-prop of the anabolic as well. Any data on the supposed extended half life of the enanthate formulation? AndroMass had the same compound.

Edit: Somebody may want to tell Strong Supp Shop or G.A.P. that they have the same compound listed on the NIL for both 1 (Omnipotent) & 4 (Construct) DHEA.
 
Super 4-DHEA is just a different name for 4-DHEA or 4-AD. They all have different nomenclatures. The only thing that makes it better than the others is the sublingual absorption, making a smaller dosage reaquired to experience a good effect and because of it making it cheaper.
 
I understand all that. My question is it appears there is a labeling error (or website snafu) - they have two different compounds with identical chemical names. Doesn't breed confidence for an educated consumer.
 
The_Old_Guy said:
I understand all that. My question is it appears there is a labeling error (or website snafu) - they have two different compounds with identical chemical names. Doesn't breed confidence for an educated consumer.
Click to expand...

Simply for marketing purposes. Super 4-DHEA seems more powerful than 4-AD right ?
 
Avelheda said:
Simply for marketing purposes. Super 4-DHEA seems more powerful than 4-AD right ?
Click to expand...

Oh boy. Well, I'm horrible at realizing sarcasm, so forgive me...

From my limited research (all of 2 hrs) on this compound, the "Super" is because of the supposed enanthate esther of the SubL compound. It prolongs the life of the compound in the system, over "regular" 4-AD. I'm still not asking about any of that - their labels appear jacked up - you can not have a 1-Andro and a 4-AD with the exact same chemical name. Is this thing on? [tap, tap] I know you don't know, I was hoping the StrongSupp guys would join in.
 
The_Old_Guy said:
Oh boy. Well, I'm horrible at realizing sarcasm, so forgive me...

From my limited research (all of 2 hrs) on this compound, the "Super" is because of the supposed enanthate esther of the SubL compound. It prolongs the life of the compound in the system, over "regular" 4-AD. I'm still not asking about any of that - their labels appear jacked up - you can not have a 1-Andro and a 4-AD with the exact same chemical name. Is this thing on? [tap, tap] I know you don't know, I was hoping the StrongSupp guys would join in.
Click to expand...

Well I wanna buy it, it is converted to testosterone and its not that expensive nor liver toxic, if this is true it's the substitute for testosterone shots right ? ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top