Studies on the in vivo metabolism of the SARM YK11: Identification and characterizati

What that says to me basically is this is a prodrug to 20-keto methyl nandrolone and it’s 5b isomers.
 
I read it....wish it made more sense to me lol. I'll read it again later I suppose.

From what I DID understand at first glance....does this mean it may have a much greater anabolic effect than we are giving it credit for?
 
bigbeaph said:
I read it....wish it made more sense to me lol. I'll read it again later I suppose.

From what I DID understand at first glance....does this mean it may have a much greater anabolic effect than we are giving it credit for?
Click to expand...

Maybe. But downstream metabolites will (probably) need to interact with 17,20-desmolase in order to convert to something active. Hard to
Do with an oral drug.
 
2kvette said:
Maybe. But downstream metabolites will (probably) need to interact with 17,20-desmolase in order to convert to something active. Hard to
Do with an oral drug.
Click to expand...

This brings up a question... would it be possible to package a prohormone along with powdered or liquefied enzymes?
 
Old Witch said:
This brings up a question... would it be possible to package a prohormone along with powdered or liquefied enzymes?
Click to expand...
I find it hard to believe that PA came up with all his insane compounds both before and after ergopharm....and didnt do what he could with enzymes. I mean what an easy way to turn 1ad into a non methyl oral better than a LOT of real aas.
 
Old Witch said:
This brings up a question... would it be possible to package a prohormone along with powdered or liquefied enzymes?
Click to expand...

Okay, this is genius actually. I've never thought of it. But yes you absolutely could do it.

Two problems.

1)They would have to never ever ever be exposed to temperatures above body temp. If they are, they become denatured and no longer work.

2)The law covers whats known as "constructive possession" meaning that having all the necessary means/ingredients on hand WITH the intent to make the substance is still considered possession of the substance.
 
2kvette said:
Okay, this is genius actually. I've never thought of it. But yes you absolutely could do it.

Two problems.

1)They would have to never ever ever be exposed to temperatures above body temp. If they are, they become denatured and no longer work.

2)The law covers whats known as "constructive possession" meaning that having all the necessary means/ingredients on hand WITH the intent to make the substance is still considered possession of the substance.
Click to expand...

Do you think that covers “digestive enzymes” ? Heh...

Maybe then as a separate product.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top