andhen2003
Board Supporter
...
Last edited:
Thats one thing, if they took steroids they should make them name what they took. I can give an 8th grader candy and tell him its steroids and he'd believe me, does that mean he took steroids? NO!I can bet these kids saying they used steroids thought creatine was a steroid.
wastedwhiteboy2 said:I guess I see those percentages as a pretty low #.
andhen2003 said:BTW didn't the part about "random testing of supplements to see if they are contaminated with steroids" bother you more?
You know what lies at the end of that path...:aargh:
Why is that?Pioneer said:i hate NJ
-too many lawsAtlas said:Why is that?
I hate hate. Don't hate the player hate the game. This is another slam dunk political power grabbing move. I mean who is going to take the alternative side? Yes vote for me and I will guarentee that your children will have the best steroids that their tax subsidized money can buy. Not only will your kid know the difference betwen long and short esters but also the importance of a good SERM.So remember a vote for me is a vote for drugs.Did someone say abortion? Please teach my children how to live because I just don't have the time....Jersey rules!Pioneer said:i hate NJ
wastedwhiteboy2 said:why pick on athletic guys? what about the pot heads or the drunks? other drugs are being abused in high school at a higher percentage.
It is kind of funny because of all the people I know that use drugs: the people that use steroids are the most productive. They are cops,firemen doctors, teachers, trainers, pro(and non pro) athletes, actors dancers and just people who are dedicated enough to research and disiplined enough to train and diet. They are the same goal oriented people that I would think the government would want to comprise the population.They have a much stronger work ethic than say the people I know who prefer pot, heroin and mdma. with just plain drunks being at the bottom of the food chain.CDB said:Rates of drug use/abuse tend to go in cycles as does enforcement of prohibition. Focus attention on the efforts made fighting the war on drugs and no one will pay attention to the fact that it's a losing battle. Put simply, in over 7 decades of prohibition with varying degrees of enforcement the government hasn't been able to affect drug usage rates in any perceivable way. By their own figures they only intercept about 10-20% of all drug imports into this country.
My guess, and I'm a big cynic on this issue so take this with a grain of salt please, but my guess would be that marijuana use figures are up, probably along with alcohol and maybe others. So, concentrate on roids, the drug of the moment. When the marijuana numbers go down again in a fews years (usuage rates seem to be cyclical) claim success in that area and shift attention away from the rise in steroid, cocaine and amphetamine use.
I recall recently the government was claiming success in the War on Cocaine because they said street prices had gone up. Not only were they wrong (50 bags were still 50 bags here, being an occasionaly bumper myself I know) but it shows their complete ignorance of the economics driving this issue. The higher prices are a guarantee of more imports because of the profit being gained on each sale. The harder and more successfully the government fights, the more they guarantee availability. This will be true until they start executing people for minor use and dealing offenses, and cutting off limbs and what not as they do in other countries. To achieve that of course we'd have to completely shred the constitution here in US, but it's not like we're not heading down that path anyway. In fact, cynic that I am, I'm inclined to believe that's the very reason for all such nonsense policies: to get more and more power into the hands of the government.
wastedwhiteboy2 said:why pick on athletic guys? what about the pot heads or the drunks? other drugs are being abused in high school at a higher percentage.
well i hate your hating of hate.anabolicrhino said:I hate hate.
I hate add on redundancy, but I will fight to the death your right to hate my hating of hate(or should that be hatred?)Pioneer said:well i hate your hating of hate.
I can assure you that I "thought" about it before I replied.It is just that some replies require more thought than others.I have set up an email account just for any thoughtless replies I might receive. A more critical person might accuse you of being passive aggressive.Oh, I don't wear make up and I will kiss whom I chose to kiss, thank you.BHERTZ said:Well at least you both hate something, so you can both share that interest? :cheers:
so kiss and make up, no need to clog my email box with thoughtless replies.
My pleasure.It's all in good fun!BHERTZ said:thanks for the diagnosis!
i dont know...anabolicrhino said:I hate add on redundancy, but I will fight to the death your right to hate my hating of hate(or should that be hatred?)