Why do people say sr9009 is garbage orally when I’ve read good reviews on it? I appreciate the half life is 4 hours and needs to be dosed throughout the day, but is it still not useful for a cut? Thanks
Why do people say sr9009 is garbage orally when I’ve read good reviews on it? I appreciate the half life is 4 hours and needs to be dosed throughout the day, but is it still not useful for a cut? Thanks
There's speculation that the folks getting results on it have been sold GW-501516 labeled as SR9009. I've also heard the placebo argument, which is possible, but I've seen enough positive reviews to lean toward these people getting something effective in their bottles.
I know of a lab animal that was in a study for injectable SR9009 and had zero results. 8 weeks. 2x 15mg daily.
10ml @ 30mg/ml Maybe a higher concentration of it at 10ml would provide results?
I wonder what is the maximent concentration level achievable without breaking?
I know of a lab animal that was in a study for injectable SR9009 and had zero results. 8 weeks. 2x 15mg daily.
10ml @ 30mg/ml Maybe a higher concentration of it at 10ml would provide results?
I wonder what is the maximent concentration level achievable without breaking?
I know of a lab animal that got zero results running over 20 a day injectable. This lab rat was very keen for it to work but much like the uk parliament on brexit it got no where....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.