SDMZ 2.0 vs SDMX 3.0 - Significant Difference ??

BillyBatson

BillyBatson

Member
SDMZ 2.0 vs SDMZ 3.0 - Significant Difference ??

QUESTION:
Does the added component of 1-alpha in SDMZ 3.0 make a significant difference/impact (for potential gains)
than it's absence in SDMZ 2.0?
 
BillyBatson said:
QUESTION:
Does the added component of 1-alpha in SDMZ 3.0 make a significant difference/impact (for potential gains)
than it's absence in SDMZ 2.0?
Click to expand...
Yes, the addition of Alpha 1 in SDMZ makes for a pretty significant potential increase in mass gains as well as increase in toxicity and sides.
 
Yep you'll see better results with super dmz 3.0 as it is stronger. Speaking of iml super dmz 4.0 is about to release at strong supplement shop so keep an eye out.
 
BillyBatson said:
How do you think dosing SDMZ 2.0 at 3 per day - or 30mg ea of dmz and msten - might compare?
Click to expand...
Roughly the same as your last cycle. Possibly worse sides. Roughly the same to better gains. It's all speculation. What's your goals? If you enjoyed SDMZ 2 then logical step is to either try SDMZ 3 or try Alpha 1 solo if you're worried about it. I wouldn't run exact same cycle twice in a row.
 
That's what I was wondering. I felt that my SDMZ 2.0 cycle worked pretty well - so I'm looking to improve upon it.

Perhaps I will try SDMZ 3.0 next, as you suggest.
 
BillyBatson said:
That's what I was wondering. I felt that my SDMZ 2.0 cycle worked pretty well - so I'm looking to improve upon it.

Perhaps I will try SDMZ 3.0 next, as you suggest.
Click to expand...

I did SDMZ 2.0, my next cycle was SDMZ 2.0 (4 weeks) stacked with max lmg (6weeks) and it was great.
 
Non methylated bulking compound that was nice to add to strong ph's. It could be ran longer due to less toxicity. I wanted to post a link but i need more posts to do so... google max lmg prohormone wiki for more info and hit first link.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top