Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Sarms Labz legit?

YoungThor

YoungThor

Well-known member
I’m getting close to running a cycle again. Sarms Labz is a sponsor on here and they’re running a great deal if you use the code AM35. I’ve never tried this company though so I don’t want to make the purchase before talking to you guys. Have any of you used this company? Are their sarms quality product? Was shipping fast? Thanks.
 
I don’t, but it’s gotta be legit if it’s a sponsor. Looking at the price with the deal there’s still cheaper options that are legit and great.
 
Mathb33 said:
I don’t, but it’s gotta be legit if it’s a sponsor. Looking at the price with the deal there’s still cheaper options that are legit and great.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I was thinking AM wouldn’t attach themselves to a company that’s not legit but I just wanted to double check.
 
Just an FYI for me, but what goes into someone becoming a sponsor? Do they just pony up money or do the moderators or owners check products and reviews? I am curious as i knkow on some sites they have the "supplements" that IFBB pros are using as sponsors and there is often talk that some places get their neg reviews removed. That is not something i have heard here, but more and more i hear the more and more i thinking of keeping legal or research chemical to supplement my trt.
 
YoungThor said:
I’m getting close to running a cycle again. Sarms Labz is a sponsor on here and they’re running a great deal if you use the code AM35. I’ve never tried this company though so I don’t want to make the purchase before talking to you guys. Have any of you used this company? Are their sarms quality product? Was shipping fast? Thanks.
Click to expand...

What are you planning on running? Why don't you just use AAS. Just curious
 
jtbull said:
Just an FYI for me, but what goes into someone becoming a sponsor? Do they just pony up money or do the moderators or owners check products and reviews? I am curious as i knkow on some sites they have the "supplements" that IFBB pros are using as sponsors and there is often talk that some places get their neg reviews removed. That is not something i have heard here, but more and more i hear the more and more i thinking of keeping legal or research chemical to supplement my trt.
Click to expand...

I highly doubt mods actually check purity and authenticity of products. I don’t think many places do as its costly, so I can almost certainly say an open forum place like AM doesn’t either. Doesn’t mean that specific company isn’t trustworthy - but just bc someone’s a board sponsor doesn’t indicate they’re credible with their claims.
 
RickyBlobby said:
What are you planning on running? Why don't you just use AAS. Just curious
Click to expand...

I wanna run tbol but my financial situation is **** right now. If I run it at 30mg for 7 weeks that’ll cost me almost $250 if I go with the UGL I’m thinking about. So I’m really just leaning toward sarms again because it can be done very low cost. I guess I could always pick a cheaper AAS or just be patient and wait to run a cycle when I have more money I can waste on it. Im still in the planning stage right now.
 
YoungThor said:
I wanna run tbol but my financial situation is **** right now. If I run it at 30mg for 7 weeks that’ll cost me almost $250 if I go with the UGL I’m thinking about. So I’m really just leaning toward sarms again because it can be done very low cost. I guess I could always pick a cheaper AAS or just be patient and wait to run a cycle when I have more money I can waste on it. Im still in the planning stage right now.
Click to expand...

What about a cheaper designer steroid such as DMZ which will yield greater gains and you won’t have to buy as much because a 4 week run of DMZ compared to a Sarms 8 week run the DMZ would still probably do you better. That is what I am running next and got a 4 week supply for under $40. PM me for legit supplier if interested.
 
JoePaul39 said:
What about a cheaper designer steroid such as DMZ which will yield greater gains and you won’t have to buy as much because a 4 week run of DMZ compared to a Sarms 8 week run the DMZ would still probably do you better. That is what I am running next and got a 4 week supply for under $40. PM me for legit supplier if interested.
Click to expand...
DMZ can only be ran 4 weeks? some get confusing as i understand never take superdrol more than a week and some stuff you can take 6-8 weeks ( epistaine i think)
 
jtbull said:
DMZ can only be ran 4 weeks? some get confusing as i understand never take superdrol more than a week and some stuff you can take 6-8 weeks ( epistaine i think)
Click to expand...

You can take superdrol up to 8 weeks easy if you can make it. Most guys just don’t is all. Eventually you get annoyed by it.
 
5 weeks on epistane is all I could handle, 45mg Olympus labs brand. Damn good aesthetic results though. Outstanding combined with trest
 
YoungThor said:
I wanna run tbol but my financial situation is **** right now. If I run it at 30mg for 7 weeks that’ll cost me almost $250 if I go with the UGL I’m thinking about. So I’m really just leaning toward sarms again because it can be done very low cost. I guess I could always pick a cheaper AAS or just be patient and wait to run a cycle when I have more money I can waste on it. Im still in the planning stage right now.
Click to expand...

$250 for a 7 week supply @ 30mg ed is pretty high man. I’m certainly no expert on all the different sources, but the average from what I’ve seen is around $70 per 100 pills @ 10mg each. So that would give you what, 7 weeks at 40mg, for $150 give or take?

Ive come to realize that aas might actually be cheaper than running sarms or designer drugs, and we know more about their effects so it seems the better option IMO.
 
Yeah that’s a really bad price for tbol.

The difference between what we know about sarms and AAS is that we do already understand sarms to be less carcinogenic and impactful on organ weights. By the 90s we already knew 99.9% of what we know about AAS. This is the 90s for sarms, comparatively speaking. If you don’t trust a modern endocrine characterization study for a given sarm then you cannot possibly logically trust a modern endocrine characterization study for a given AAS.
 
RickyBlobby said:
5 weeks on epistane is all I could handle, 45mg Olympus labs brand. Damn good aesthetic results though. Outstanding combined with trest
Click to expand...

Sounds like a great combo.
If I ever run Epistane again, that's what I'll be trying.
 
Renew1 said:
Sounds like a great combo.
If I ever ryn Epistane again, that's what I'll be trying.
Click to expand...
Highly, highly recommended.

I used transdermal formestane from OL as my AI. Like I said amazing results. Major recomp in a large caloric deficit.
 
Old Witch said:
The difference between what we know about sarms and AAS is that we do already understand sarms to be less carcinogenic and impactful on organ weights.
Click to expand...

From what you know is this across the board for all sarms?
 
bigbeaph said:
From what you know is this across the board for all sarms?
Click to expand...

No, I somewhat misspoke. We know which ones are and aren’t as such, rather. The ones that have made it into bodybuilding so far should be quite safe in this regard. Just being a sarm doesn’t automatically mean safe or effective. Finasteride is a sarm. It’s also an anti androgen as a great many sarms are. The ones we use are androgens.
 
bigbeaph said:
That's the one I actually want to throw into a cycle soon!
Click to expand...

Well I’d think of it as an oral steroid with all the associated risk. No safer whatsoever. They have a selectivizing attachment on the d ring of methyl nandrolone to make yk11. As far as I know only tested in vitro. So, in a Petri dish. No telling if it’s really selective in the way they anticipated, though it’s supposed to also inhibit myostatin by its control from the cell nucleus. If it’s truly how they wanted, it should produce monster growth. As far as I can tell it produces monster aggression and pumps, strength.... not so much size whatsoever.
 
Old Witch said:
Well I’d think of it as an oral steroid with all the associated risk. No safer whatsoever. They have a selectivizing attachment on the d ring of methyl nandrolone to make yk11. As far as I know only tested in vitro. So, in a Petri dish. No telling if it’s really selective in the way they anticipated, though it’s supposed to also inhibit myostatin by its control from the cell nucleus. If it’s truly how they wanted, it should produce monster growth. As far as I can tell it produces monster aggression and pumps, strength.... not so much size whatsoever.
Click to expand...
So your thought is that maybe not so much myostatin inhibition....essentially very androgenic? Still sounds cool. With the insane strength I'm getting off nandrolone right now I'd like to throw it in immediately after and see how far this train can roll
 
Old Witch said:
Well I’d think of it as an oral steroid with all the associated risk. No safer whatsoever. They have a selectivizing attachment on the d ring of methyl nandrolone to make yk11. As far as I know only tested in vitro. So, in a Petri dish. No telling if it’s really selective in the way they anticipated, though it’s supposed to also inhibit myostatin by its control from the cell nucleus. If it’s truly how they wanted, it should produce monster growth. As far as I can tell it produces monster aggression and pumps, strength.... not so much size whatsoever.
Click to expand...

At only 6mg of yk11 I was nearly psychotic haha. But seriously I was a very aggressive, all around manic person, suffering some pretty crazy mood swings and thinking irrationally at times. My libido was also insane, kind of too high to be honest. My strength, muscle endurance, and general energy levels went up a lot. But it did not produce much muscle growth. My diet may have been to blame for that. And also I realize I may just be super sensitive to the compound and other people may react differently. Oh, and my blood pressure sky rocketed on that stuff. I’d breath heavily when I was just sitting down. I had constant tension headaches. I personally think it’s more like AAS then like sarms.
 
CultiVader said:
$250 for a 7 week supply @ 30mg ed is pretty high man. I’m certainly no expert on all the different sources, but the average from what I’ve seen is around $70 per 100 pills @ 10mg each. So that would give you what, 7 weeks at 40mg, for $150 give or take?

Ive come to realize that aas might actually be cheaper than running sarms or designer drugs, and we know more about their effects so it seems the better option IMO.
Click to expand...


Well I was thinking about making the purchase from a very popular reseller that carries many different ugl brands. I was going to go with one of the more expensive ugl’s Tbol because they have a good reputation. One of my main concerns is that I’ll just get low dose dbol or something. If I go with one of the cheaper brands then I can run a pretty cheap cycle. For example I could run tbol for 7 weeks at 30mg for about $100. But I won’t purchase tbol from them until I can find some positive reviews.
 
Well without naming the lab, I’ll say I just read some great reviews for a Japanese lab and I can get their tbol for pretty damn cheap. So maybe I’ll go with them and run that and say screw sarms for now.
 
jtbull said:
DMZ can only be ran 4 weeks? some get confusing as i understand never take superdrol more than a week and some stuff you can take 6-8 weeks ( epistaine i think)
Click to expand...

4 weeks is on the low end for DMZ runs.
, but he said cost was the factior so one bottle can last four weeks. This website Invalid Link Removed recommends runs from four to six weeks since it is methylated.
 
YoungThor said:
At only 6mg of yk11 I was nearly psychotic haha. But seriously I was a very aggressive, all around manic person, suffering some pretty crazy mood swings and thinking irrationally at times. My libido was also insane, kind of too high to be honest. My strength, muscle endurance, and general energy levels went up a lot. But it did not produce much muscle growth. My diet may have been to blame for that. And also I realize I may just be super sensitive to the compound and other people may react differently. Oh, and my blood pressure sky rocketed on that stuff. I’d breath heavily when I was just sitting down. I had constant tension headaches. I personally think it’s more like AAS then like sarms.
Click to expand...

Sounds about right. It’s definitely a steroid, as far as the molecule is concerned. And its effects show that in spades. Unfortunate that it doesn’t add mass, but I’m sure in a mass building stack it would add that missing touch of aggression to really spur intense training to failure and beyond.
 
Old Witch said:
Sounds about right. It’s definitely a steroid, as far as the molecule is concerned. And its effects show that in spades. Unfortunate that it doesn’t add mass, but I’m sure in a mass building stack it would add that missing touch of aggression to really spur intense training to failure and beyond.
Click to expand...

I assume since it is more chemically structured like a steroid than a Sarm it could possibly effect both Hematocrit and prostate unlike traditional Sarms?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top