SAN Attitude = Rebound XT replacement?

NO HYPE

Active member
I know a lot of people use Rebound XT but if you want an even better product with a higher dosage of the same active ingredient (3,17-Dioxoetioallocholan-1,4,6-triene), plus an additional active ingredient, than try SAN Attitude. I found it for $22 a bottle.
 
Robboe said:
Attitude is in a proprietary blend so you have no idea what the ATD dose in it is.

Exactly right. Proprietary blends are for companies who want to make it look like they have a lot of ingredients but in reality have wimpy dosages in most areas while ramping up the dosages in others to show a large proprietary blend weight.
 
Thanks. Great points. You guys have just changed the way I look at companies with "proprietary blends."
 
NO HYPE said:
Thanks. Great points. You guys have just changed the way I look at companies with "proprietary blends."

I hate them, but we may have to do a few with future products (like we've done with rebound reloaded) to protect the product and avoid knock-offs.
 
Robboe said:
I hate them, but we may have to do a few with future products (like we've done with rebound reloaded) to protect the product and avoid knock-offs.

Don't worry, I dig your company and I won't rule proprietary blends out completely but I'll be way more cautious next time. Without soundin like a jerkoff....If the law requires the ingredient to be listed on the label but not the actual amount of the ingredient, then this would mean that other companies would only have to research the proper amount of the ingredients and then they would have the knock-off correct? Wouldn't a patent take care of this problem?
 
NO HYPE said:
Don't worry, I dig your company and I won't rule proprietary blends out completely but I'll be way more cautious next time. Without soundin like a jerkoff....If the law requires the ingredient to be listed on the label but not the actual amount of the ingredient, then this would mean that other companies would only have to research the proper amount of the ingredients and then they would have the knock-off correct? Wouldn't a patent take care of this problem?

Patents = A lot of time + A lot of MONEY :)

Frankly I like their prices the way they are now ;)
 
NO HYPE said:
Don't worry, I dig your company and I won't rule proprietary blends out completely but I'll be way more cautious next time. Without soundin like a jerkoff....If the law requires the ingredient to be listed on the label but not the actual amount of the ingredient, then this would mean that other companies would only have to research the proper amount of the ingredients and then they would have the knock-off correct? Wouldn't a patent take care of this problem?

Most don't even seen to bother with getting the dosage right. Or the right extract %. or even the right extract at all.

It just looks good on the label and dupes those less in the know about the compound/extract.
 
Back
Top