What about Buccal delivery? There is a study from 2002 wherein 1mg resveratrol in 50ml of solution was held and swished in the mouth for 1 minute. After two minutes, blood levels of resveratrol reached 37ng/ml. However, its hard to tell what blood levels were two minutes after that and it is limited to the one study. I think buccal may offer better absorption in that it is not subjected to first pass liver metabolism but only up to a point due to limited surface area. Perhaps even doing some Listerine beforehand would be even better as permeability would most likely be imcreased.
As above; Resveratrol already has a quick peak...I imagine that is why study authors settled on measurement at 2 minutes although I am not in recollection of the study you speak of so am not 100% on that as I haven't read their methods or discussion.
It is estimated that the permeability of the buccal mucosa is
4-4000 times (notice the WIDE range) greater than that of the skin. As indicative by the wide range in this reported value, there are considerable differences in permeability between different regions of the oral cavity because of the diverse structures and functions of the different oral mucosae. In general, the permeabilities of the oral mucosae decrease in the order of sublingual greater than buccal, and buccal greater than palatal. This rank order is based on the relative thickness and degree of keratinization of these tissues, with the sublingual mucosa being relatively thin and non-keratinized, the buccal thicker and non-keratinized, and the palatal intermediate in thickness but keratinized.
To it's credit and discredit; it contradicts what is known about sublingual versus buccal in the advantage department. Due to two important differences between the sublingual mucosa and the buccal mucosa, but focusing on one might do the most justice. First difference being in the
permeability characteristics of the region, where the buccal mucosa is less permeable and is thus not able to give a rapid onset of absorption (i.e., more suitable for a sustained release formulation). So, we are talking about something that should SLOW absorption but sees a peak at what might look like 2 minutes (failing compared to regular oral delivery).
Interesting comment on Listerine; although I don't know that that would be anything more than sheer pontification. Grand scheme, it couldn't hurt...BUT would the likely increased cost of such delivery methods be worth it and/or necessary from an end-result standpoint...I am unsure.
How about subres from taurus nutrition? They have a oral delivery, any good?
I think this looks
interesting with the permeability increasing agent - cyclodextrin. The problem is that I would be inclined to believe that this would even heighten serum response levels...in other words, make the peak even quicker than buccal above. I honestly don't know nor am I a believer that Taurus Nutrition has sound evidence for other than it looks good on paper, but me saying it is at least "interesting" must say something as I am not easily impressed. The company seems to postulate quite a bit with their products - not that they don't openly admit that though.
I guess in "worst case" scenario, it would mean that you would need to dose it multiple times in the day and then some; but I would love to predict and/or plot out a dose-response curve.
D_