Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Ralox

lilbigman1

Banned
Has anyone actually had any success with using this on aas induced gyno?

Every log I look at is never finished and none of the chem sites have reviews on it
 
lilbigman1 said:
Has anyone actually had any success with using this on aas induced gyno? Every log I look at is never finished and none of the chem sites have reviews on it
Click to expand...
It's like 20x stronger than nolva at blocking receptor sites. It doesn't have the same effect on Fsh and lh in pct though. It's like torem. Bottom of the pile. That alone should tell you it'll work. That's my go to.
 
I've used everything..

Torem had my nuts hanging faster than anything..

Ralox is better for gyno by far from personal exp so I agree with Beast.. I don't need documents to tell me what got rid of my boob the fastest!
 
On cycle for me its the best gyno protection.once I get the itchy and painfull nips i just take 30-60 mgs for 4-5 days and it is cured
 
Sion said:
On cycle for me its the best gyno protection.once I get the itchy and painfull nips i just take 30-60 mgs for 4-5 days and it is cured
Click to expand...

So you just cover up the issue with a bandaid on cycle?
you should be using an AI or adding an AI on cycle, not a serm, unless addign serm for say a week while waiting for AI to take on full affect.
off cycle is another story, then use a SERM (ralox is really good for this application), since E2 should be back down ( should go for blood work though to know best)
 
When it comes to gyno prevention or treatment ralox is king by far. Its binding affinity to the e2 receptor in breast tissue is stronger than any other serm. Also you dont need to look for logs - you can look for real medical studies as it is proven to be the most effective at gyno treatment and reversal even including pubertal gyno. So anecdotal broscience isnt needed - it has real science backing its use.
As far as pct it (ralox) does not stim the production of LH like tamox , clomid or torem. Toremifene is pretty close to tamox when it comes to induction of LH production and it has an amazing safety profile. That being said I rely on tamox and clomid. If, however, one of those 2 caused me unmanageable sides I would in no way hesitate to replace the offending serm with torem in my pct protocol.
 
Blergs said:
So you just cover up the issue with a bandaid on cycle?
you should be using an AI or adding an AI on cycle, not a serm, unless addign serm for say a week while waiting for AI to take on full affect.
off cycle is another story, then use a SERM (ralox is really good for this application), since E2 should be back down ( should go for blood work though to know best)
Click to expand...

This is correct. You should always manage estrogen on cycle with an ai. Serm on hand just in case. If exceptionally gyno prone it could be necessary to run an ai to manage e2 as well as a serm for gyno prevention but that should be in rare circumstance. For 95+% an properly dosed ai will manage e2 and by doing so prevent gyno, which btw isnt even really the most dangerous side of unmanaged estrogen.
 
Ofcourse I use ai m8 but sometimes its not enough:p so when sides hit I use evista to stop them and adjust ai dosage or lower the offending compound dosage
 
jbryand101b said:
I thought torem was best. (for pct) Haven't used it, but that's what I've heard.
Click to expand...

Here's a similar study with nolva torem and ralox that I mentioned previously. Clomid has the greatest overall effect on tt with nolva close and torem a little further back. Invalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top