KevinConn
New member
So I have a bit of an odd theoretical question about the mechanisms of muscle growth that I've been wondering about for a while so I figured I'd ask here and see what other people think.
So say you have a lifter and they are doing a push (chest, shoulders, tri's), pull (back, bi), legs split. The routine is push, pull, legs, push, pull, legs, off repeat. So they are hitting every muscle twice a week.
Now, say they kept every variable the exact same (diet, rest, etc.) but only did the two push workouts in a week and nothing else. So they still hit their chest, shoulders and tri's twice a week but no other muscles.
My question is, would the chest, shoulder and triceps grow more, less or the same as they would when working out the whole body?
Obviously no one would ever work out this way but I'm just curious about the mechanisms behind muscle growth and if working out other body parts takes away from the growth and recovery potential from other muscles or if it actually enhances it due to a whole body hormonal type effect.
Let me know what you think!
So say you have a lifter and they are doing a push (chest, shoulders, tri's), pull (back, bi), legs split. The routine is push, pull, legs, push, pull, legs, off repeat. So they are hitting every muscle twice a week.
Now, say they kept every variable the exact same (diet, rest, etc.) but only did the two push workouts in a week and nothing else. So they still hit their chest, shoulders and tri's twice a week but no other muscles.
My question is, would the chest, shoulder and triceps grow more, less or the same as they would when working out the whole body?
Obviously no one would ever work out this way but I'm just curious about the mechanisms behind muscle growth and if working out other body parts takes away from the growth and recovery potential from other muscles or if it actually enhances it due to a whole body hormonal type effect.
Let me know what you think!