Thre isnt that much feedback on mdht too. Can you tell me how was your cycle?s.norman said:i like mdht personally-haven't tried the others yet
i hope it is high anabolic moderate androgenic...androgens are good for you...i love my strength when i use androgenscsly said:M5aa and MDHT are high androgenic low anabolic. Prostanozol from what I understand is high anabolic low androgenic.
There are some exceptions to this rule about sheer strenght. I think Superdrol and MAX LMG are. I didnt feel both to be very androgenic, but i had very good strenght gains on them (for the public, i have just beated my PR on bench press today and i'm on a low carb).bigman420 said:i hope it is high anabolic moderate androgenic...androgens are good for you...i love my strength when i use androgens
mdht is a good hardening agent but will not do much for pre-w/o stimulant. you should shoot for 75-80mg/day divided into 2 doses. it will help bring out some striations and burn some fat-serves a good purposeSyr said:Thre isnt that much feedback on mdht too. Can you tell me how was your cycle?
I'm going to use it as pre-workout stimulant only at the moment and i'm not sure at all of which dose would work. I tried 25mg and *probably* did nothing, i'm going to try 50mg next week.
I dont feel like running it all days. i'm concerned about the androgenic sides and the methylation too at the moment. So, trying 75mg, splitted one dose in the morning and one 45mins before workout would make sense or is a waste? Note that i WO 3 times a week + cardio days.s.norman said:mdht is a good hardening agent but will not do much for pre-w/o stimulant. you should shoot for 75-80mg/day divided into 2 doses. it will help bring out some striations and burn some fat-serves a good purpose
I think that depends on the effectiveness of the ester attached. Looking at the results MAX LMG has proven to be effective ad the recommended dosage. Prostan is a progestin as well. Also, i belive that ALR does pretty extensive tests before putting something on the market. Maybe one will need 100 instead of 75mg, but I'm pretty positive on this. Note also that the same kind of ester will be used on Elephant to ergomax structure in place of the 17aa group.handzilla said:The only other unmethylated orals that had good bioavailabilty were 1,4andro and 1-ad.
How potent do you guys think Prostanozol will be due to the fact that it is not methylated?
I just have a slight feeing that this might turn out to be one of those products that are considered underdosed and end up falling short b/c of cost-effectiveness. Not that I actually want this, b/c I'd love to try a product like this and end up with outstanding results.
prostanazol is not a progestin.Syr said:I think that depends on the effectiveness of the ester attached. Looking at the results MAX LMG has proven to be effective ad the recommended dosage. Prostan is a progestin as well. Also, i belive that ALR does pretty extensive tests before putting something on the market. Maybe one will need 100 instead of 75mg, but I'm pretty positive on this. Note also that the same kind of ester will be used on Elephant to ergomax structure in place of the 17aa group.
Wait the log, bro and hope for the best![]()
s.norman said:i like mdht personally-haven't tried the others yet
1. Don't be highjacking my threadWest_Coast_repp said:how long of a cycle of mdht do you run? i have 3 bottles of it (myo chem's methyl caged rage), and i'm wondering if it's worth it to run a cycle.
1.) i wasn't "high jacking" your thread.handzilla said:1. Don't be highjacking my thread
2. Use the fyuckin search button
3. Your ass is too young to even be doing 1 & 2, so beat it...
be4 you get your ass banned!
they all are (M5, MDHT, winny, prostan, SD)wastedwhiteboy2 said:I thought it was a DHT derivative.
That was the cause of my confusion, thanks for clearing up, bro.same_old said:they all are (M5, MDHT, winny, prostan, SD)
prostan, if it turns out to be like it's buddy winny (and it very well may) will be pretty anabolic with a fair amount of androgenicity. hairloss potential, strength, vascularity, hardening are all likely. winny is ANTI-progestinic, by the way (which is why it is stacked with deca very often)
Damn, I didnt stock on M5. I have 3 bottles of mdht and i'll use them in some stack, though. the one with SD seemed to be particularly good for a lean bulk.MDHT is not a good pre-WO stim; it takes ~2 weeks to kick in. only M5 serves that purpose.
About joints ALR said it shoulndt be like winny. About hair, I dont know.truth is, we'll all have to wait and see what prostan does....i for one won't go near it (my hairline and joints say "no" to winny)
Due to the unmethylation, It's easy to say that prostan is equivalent to winny divided by 3. On the other hand comparing 1,4andro and Boldenone to M1,4 and Methylated Boldenone respectively, we can see that they are completely different compounds providing completely different effects.Syr said:That was the cause of my confusion, thanks for clearing up, bro.
Damn, I didnt stock on M5. I have 3 bottles of mdht and i'll use them in some stack, though. the one with SD seemed to be particularly good for a lean bulk.
About joints ALR said it shoulndt be like winny. About hair, I dont know.
EH......i sorta agree. we can get in the ballpark with comparisons like these. 1,4ad is actually VERY similar to EQ: slow, steady, lean, low sides and M1,4ADD isnt all that far from dbol, at least in my experience: wet, bloaty, raises BP, good strength gains.handzilla said:Due to the unmethylation, It's easy to say that prostan is equivalent to winny divided by 3. On the other hand comparing 1,4andro and Boldenone to M1,4 and Methylated Boldenone respectively, we can see that they are completely different compounds providing completely different effects.
um....1,4ad will obviously work more quickly than EQ as it is in base form and administered orally. why did you only run EQ for 8 weeks??? my comparison was not dealing with cycle length; only results and sides, and i maintain that they are more similar than not.Bigfishy said:1,4ad is not like EQ in my experience. I gained the same amount of weight and strength in 4 weeks on 1,4 that EQ gave me in eight. I also don't think my gains were as lean and hard on 1,4ad as EQ.
hmm... 1,4ad did absolutely nothing to me in 42 days, besides boosting my appetite. I'm definitely exclusing EQ from my list of gear to use in the future.same_old said:um....1,4ad will obviously work more quickly than EQ as it is in base form and administered orally. why did you only run EQ for 8 weeks??? my comparison was not dealing with cycle length; only results and sides, and i maintain that they are more similar than not.
These are great newsMax32 said:added prost to EQ about 12 days ago. Effects are very similar to winny, except my strength is up more than usual. Joints are not sore either. I added 4-OHT cyp into it a few days back as well. Y'all can check out the cycle in the cycles section....