PowerFUL

bearjuice

New member
PowerFULL

Ummm can somebody tell me why USPlabs are stating that PowerFULL doubles GH if it has been scientically proven to increase GH by 221% after the first dose?

Doubling GH would be a 100% increase:think:
 
Last edited:
100% of 100 = 100
221% of 100 = 221

100 x 1 = 100
100 x 2 (doubled) = 200
100 x 2.21 (221%) = 221

Fun with numbers.
 
Actually he's right.... If you raise something by 100%, you have doubled it.

Take 100 degrees. Now, raise that by 100%, or another 100 degrees, and you have 200 degrees.

However, It sounds like he has a beef, and I'm not sure what it is, because if his numbers are right, then USP is UNDERSTATING the rise in GH.
 
Actually he's right.... If you raise something by 100%, you have doubled it.

Take 100 degrees. Now, raise that by 100%, or another 100 degrees, and you have 200 degrees.

However, It sounds like he has a beef, and I'm not sure what it is, because if his numbers are right, then USP is UNDERSTATING the rise in GH.
No, you're right. But I am too. 100% of 100 is 100. 221% of 100 is 221 ;)

They do advertise it as

Invalid Link Removed

Double Growth Hormone Production **

• Scientifically proven to increase natural Human Growth Hormone (HGH) production by at least 221% in just one dose!

A beef with USPlabs...who'da thunk it?
 
No, you're right. But I am too. 100% of 100 is 100. 221% of 100 is 221 ;)

They do advertise it as



A beef with USPlabs...who'da thunk it?

Yea now that I take a second look...... Must be how Enron did their accounting lol :) You can make the numbers mean what ya want just depending on how ya word the problem.
 
Actually he's right.... If you raise something by 100%, you have doubled it.

Take 100 degrees. Now, raise that by 100%, or another 100 degrees, and you have 200 degrees.

However, It sounds like he has a beef, and I'm not sure what it is, because if his numbers are right, then USP is UNDERSTATING the rise in GH.


Just because I point out something doesn't mean I have beef about it.
Afterall I could say that your response and comments about me suggests that you have a chip on your shoulder, but that would be drawing a long bow now wouldn't it :)

Ummm BTW I've stacked it with AP and luv the results
 
Nah.. No chip. Just seems that there is a big bullseye that has been painted on USPLabs as of late, so I get a bit suspicious when I see posts about them that look like they could be heading down that path.
 
Back
Top