Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

phera discontinued?

luggnut

New member
is phera discontinued too? i saw AX's website said it was a few days ago but i just checked again and the word discontinued was removed
 
luggnut said:
is phera discontinued too? i saw AX's website said it was a few days ago but i just checked again and the word discontinued was removed

It's finished. AX has discontinued all their hormonal compounds.
 
there is a product called Phera Max which is the same compound.
 
I believe Phera-max is the e-max equivalent. I don't think that G-labs has come out with a PP equal. Although now that AE has stopped who knows?
 
indeed it says that, maybe a new formulation... Any thoughts Grexx???
Invalid Link Removed same stuff or not as I know the matrix can make a difference...
 
i've got 2 bottles stocked up.. wish i would have picked some more up tho.
 
And what i have read and seen it looks like P-X is equal to PP and generic labz X-mass is the same compound as ergo-max....just what i thought though.
 
Actually, Pheramax which is now Pheramone-X is indeed what used to be Ergomax LMG. X-Mass is the same as MAX LMG. Ergomax and Max LMG are different compounds.

Generic Labz doesnt have a phera plex product. Anybody want them we have 4 or 5 Phera plex remaining.
 
Brent said:
According to my information PheramoneX and Phera Plex are 17a-Methyl-etioallocholan-2-ene-17b-ol.

you are correct. there are the same thing.
 
stri8ted_planet said:
Actually, Pheramax which is now Pheramone-X is indeed what used to be Ergomax LMG. X-Mass is the same as MAX LMG. Ergomax and Max LMG are different compounds.

Generic Labz doesnt have a phera plex product. Anybody want them we have 4 or 5 Phera plex remaining.

Here's the compound in phera-max:
17a-Methyl-etioallocholan-2ene-17b-ol 15 mg

and the compound in Phera-PLEX:
17a-Methyl-etioallocholan-2-ene-17b-ol 10mg

sorry sir, but they look the same to me.
 
Why all the confusion? If the packaging is correct and label claims are right Phera-Max is listed as 17a-Methyl-etioallocholan-2ene-17b-ol. This is according to Nutraplanets site.

This is PP unless the label claims are incorrect - right? Is the site wrong? Ive also seen it as 17-methyl-delta-2-etioallocholane.
 
OMFG!!

I just read this entire thread all at once and my brain is about to explode and catch on fire.

:icon_lol:

It's like the phone game.
 
Alpine said:
Why all the confusion? If the packaging is correct and label claims are right Phera-Max is listed as 17a-Methyl-etioallocholan-2ene-17b-ol. This is according to Nutraplanets site.

This is PP unless the label claims are incorrect - right? Is the site wrong? Ive also seen it as 17-methyl-delta-2-etioallocholane.

I beleive someone from G Labz was who stated the comparisons of products. I have not heard them say they have a PP product out. So shoot, I don't know which info is incorrect! If the compound is listed as 17a-Methyl-etioallochan-2-ene-17b-ol, then the active is indeed PP. However if it is labled as 17-Methyl-Delta 2-etioallocholane it is E Max!

I haven't seen a lable on a Phera Max bottle, so I can't say for myself what the heck is stated on there:think:
 
swole210 said:
I beleive someone from G Labz was who stated the comparisons of products. I have not heard them say they have a PP product out. So shoot, I don't know which info is incorrect! If the compound is listed as 17a-Methyl-etioallochan-2-ene-17b-ol, then the active is indeed PP. However if it is labled as 17-Methyl-Delta 2-etioallocholane it is E Max!

I haven't seen a lable on a Phera Max bottle, so I can't say for myself what the heck is stated on there:think:

It was 17a-Methyl-etioallochan-2-ene-17b-ol on Nutraplanet and 17-Methyl-Delta 2-etioallocholane other places, i guess its the site.
I feel bad for asking this because i know its been covered. I just cant remember. What was the difference supposed to be? That is betwen E Max and PP.
 
2-ene was the active in PP .. supposed to be more androgenic i think.
 
russy_russ said:
2-ene was the active in PP .. supposed to be more androgenic i think.

Right, I knew it was the 2-ene only and was supposed to be cleaner. Besides being slightly more androgenic what else was said to differ between the two?
 
not exactly sure, i never really did a lot of research on eMax
 
Back
Top