jaces
Active member
When a group of people with more credentials and qualifications tell you that you're wrong, chances are it's true.
I don't care what he has to say about technique.
And y not he has more experience and age then you?
When a group of people with more credentials and qualifications tell you that you're wrong, chances are it's true.
I don't care what he has to say about technique.
Point me to these Charles Glass instructional videos on squat, bench, and deadlift.And y not he has more experience and age then you?
Rodja why dont we agree to disagree?? I mean I have my views and you have yours so why dont we respect this and just leave it there because this can go on for a while
I believe it was you tossing around insults towards others and EVERYONE in the thread has attempted to steer you towards some enlightenment, but hell, I remember when I was 19 and knew everything as well.
When a group of people with more credentials and qualifications tell you that you're wrong, chances are it's true.
I don't care what he has to say about technique.
Yeah, I stopped watching that video as soon as he showed doing bench with the bar directly over the shoulder.
When a group of people with more credentials and qualifications tell you that you're wrong, chances are it's true.
I don't care what he has to say about technique.
If you're referencing the Charles Glass part, I truly do not care whatsoever what he has I say. I haven't since I stopped reading Flex 10 years ago. Even he will say that most BB'ers have terrible form, which is funny considering the direction of the thread.
I am set in my ways, but I also am highly critical of my own technique. Every time I post a video, I'm looking for critique even when it's maximal or near maximal weight. You can ask anyone who has seen me lift or my videos how technical of a lifter I am in every aspect.
No, I wasn't referring to the Charles Glass part, sorry - I should have taken that out. It was the credentials and qualifications part......
I know you are critical of yourself, and that is why you have so much knowledge. I'm not knocking or taking anything away from you. You are way further along than I am...
You mean the part where he said "if multiple people with more credentials and qualifications are telling you you're wrong; then you probably are"? (Paraphrase)
Not sure how that = throwing insults.
Or how its wrong to believe that.
If a doctor gave you medical advice, it would probably hold more weight than if some random guy on the street did. How is training advice different?
I wasn't saying that specific thing was an insult.
And, I've had doctors tell me things that are just wrong, or family members, etc. I've also had mechanics, engineers, attorneys, etc. all tell me things that were flat out wrong.
Credentials don't make you right. Being right makes you right, and hopefully you have those credentials because you have a history of learning and knowing what is "right".
You notice how he said that " chances are its true."? That doesn't mean always.
More often than not, an expert will be correct when speaking on the subject that they are an expert in. (When compared to a layperson)
And you said that Rodja was the first to begin throwing insults, then said you were referring to that comment. But now you're saying that comment wasn't an insult?
You notice how he said that " chances are its true."? That doesn't mean always.
More often than not, an expert will be correct when speaking on the subject that they are an expert in. (When compared to a layperson)
And you said that Rodja was the first to begin throwing insults, then said you were referring to that comment. But now you're saying that comment wasn't an insult?
So if a person has done real research and read journals but he hasnt the paper behind his name its nt as valid?
So if a person has done real research and read journals but he hasnt the paper behind his name its nt as valid?
Ok you wil agre with me when I say lifting the most weight is also a result of manipulating leverage , by tucking your elbow your creating mre leverage , im I nt corect?
Depends on your personal geometry. When you lift heavy you don't have a lot of choice, your body has to accommodate the weight. That said I've seen a lot guys lift heavy stuff with really bad form, but it's obvious watching them they could do a lot better. For instance, you said you bench 320 raw, I've got 315 and I'm only 190 lb and 47 y.o. However that 315 is near (or at, or even a bit past) the limit of my abilities. I bet, based on your size and age, you could do quite a bit better than 320. BTW I have a chest like Dolly friggin Parton, but it's mostly genetic. My dad also has big pecs and while he's worked pretty hard for his whole life he's never trained weights at all.
How low should you go? When I first started lifting/bodybuilding, I always squatted atg, my calves would hit my hams with every rep. That's what was preached to me for years and years. But truthfully, I did not experience a lot of growth with that range of motion, my back always hurt, my quads were rarely the limiting factor in my sets. And, for a bodybuilder, strictly concerned with building quads and hams, I believe a shorter range of motion is best
About 5 years ago I started having lower back issues. So on the advice of an ex IFBB pro, I shortened my depth. *****! Fraud! That was how I felt. I got embarrassed for people to see me and my terrible form as I saw it...but a funny thing happened. My thighs started growing like they hadn't grown since I first began slinging the weights around! Even though I felt a little like a cheat, the weight I was "squatting" increased quickly...AND my back was feeling as good as it had ever felt.
It took me while to get over myself and stop caring about what people thought about how I squatted. Because by limiting my range of motion, I can keep ALL the tension during a set on my quads. Put more weight on them, force them to do more work, and bring them to complete failure like I could never when I was still squatting ass to grass.
I have since shortened my ROM even more. My major working sets of squats are done just short of parallel and never locking out at the top. Quads get no rest, no bounce at the bottom of reps as you see from a lot of lifters. Constant tension and heavy loads, that's the recipe for growth of any musclegroup...I'd probably get my ass handed to me if I ever entered a powerlifting meet due to "no lifts"...but I don't give a flying ****...my back is healthy and my quads are still growing
Give it a try. You will not be dissapointed