Has anybody used either product?? If so, what results did you see??
I agree with you that they are both long term products. From what I've researched, they both help boost mitochondrial function, support cellular health and healthy aging. Overall cognitive and healthy aging support is what I would like to see.I generally consider these to be long term brain health products - what results are you expecting?
what would be the difference between NIAGEN and another brand selling Niacinamide (Vitamin B3) at the same dose and apparently no fillers? is it just the brand and/or the quality you pay for?It seems NR has more human studies. To me, it looks like NIAGEN would be the way to go?
Some products I see come with a small amount of TMG. I take a co enzyme B vitamin daily.These compounds also drain your Vit B and methyl groups within the body. Something to consider when supplementing with either of these.
I read that article at Priceplow. It's for BioNMN which I believe is in the new product from Glaxon.I thought there’s been newer research on the riboside form not panning out. I don’t remember now. NMN is supposed to be superior, but I don’t remember why now. I think PricePlow did an in depth article. I think they’re sponsored by the people making NMN, I don’t remember the company now, but their articles are usually pretty good.
Some products I see come with a small amount of TMG. I take a co enzyme B vitamin daily.
These compounds also drain your Vit B and methyl groups within the body. Something to consider when supplementing with either of these.
Yes an easy fix. Only mentioned so people are awareEasy enough to "fix" as many pre's have TMG/Betaine in them and co-enzyme B complexes are getting more common. Jarrow makes one, Dr. Best makes one, and Now makes one. Also more and more multi's are using the co-enzyme forms. Besides we were all taking dibencozide for the last three decades anyways because it's an anabolic............................right?
Same here. No criticism intended friend.Yes an easy fix. Only mentioned so people are aware
nasal spray seems to be popular too. the drip on the one I have is pretty bad tho. for oral I think that's why you are supposed to do such a high dose. Dr David Sinclair was doing 1g a day of NMN. so fuckin expensive.I'm pretty certain NAD+ needs to be injected or used IV to be effective...oral has garbage bioavailability?
interesting, I am not too well versed in it, but I am one of the larger peptide / biohacking / life extension facebook groups and it comes up in discussion often. It also sounds like it makes you feel like dog **** for a few days after if you get the IV treatmentnasal spray seems to be popular too. the drip on the one I have is pretty bad tho. for oral I think that's why you are supposed to do such a high dose. Dr David Sinclair was doing 1g a day of NMN. so fuckin expensive.
Was looking at this last night. It does look promising. I'm 43 years old, and at 600 mg/day is a huge $$$ investment long term for me to see real benefit, I'm gonna need to see more to make that jump.Interpretation This study confirmed NMN supplementation increases blood intracellular NAD levels and improves physical strength and overall health in healthy middle-aged and older (40-65 years old) adults of both males and females in a dosing-response and statistically significant fashion. For the first time, we revealed that NMN supplementation can have a positive impact on human biological age. The study concluded 600mg daily oral intake is the optimal dose on observation that 900mg did not give further significant improvement over 600mg in blood cellular NAD concentration, six-minute endurance test, SF-36 health scores, and biological age. Finally, NMN supplementation is safe and well tolerate at up to 900mg as once daily oral dosing regimens.
This looks promising