It was definitely good to go when I have used it (june 2018).is 6 bromo brawn's legit?
It was definitely good to go when I have used it (june 2018).is 6 bromo brawn's legit?
standalone or on cycle thx for the info mate ...It was definitely good to go when I have used it (june 2018).
Standalone, was my first dip into the "enhanced" area.standalone or on cycle thx for the info mate ...
It’s an AI...Standalone, was my first dip into the "enhanced" area.
On cycle I dont see any point in using it.
But not nearly strong enough to be comparable to, say aromasin.It’s an AI...
And yet;SARMs are not supplements.
I love the way it says "consult a doctor", find me one qualified doctor who will go on record recommending a SARM!Yeah it’s labeled wrong as ****. In no way is Ostarine apart of any diet, labeling it as a dietary supplement is very wrong.
If you used mk your already not nattyThere is always someone on boards who make me step back and stay natty for more longer, Lol! but that is great! really appreciated your insight! i´ll study a bit further about other things
on the other hand MK677, I have already used it in the past just 10mg and rarely 20mg, and yes it increased my appetite, difficulty sleeping, and slightly elvated bp, but it is something i´m ready to deal with.
Regarding Tbol and DMZ (this one never heard of) being in a country where its a bit difficult to get stuff besides regular AAS, so will need to check and study these.
i don´t consider myself natty, due to what i´ve used such as corticosteroids for pain or taking any medicine. No one is now days to be honest.If you used mk your already not natty
Well, I wasn't looking for a explanation but corticosteroids are not in the same category. Mk677 is a performance enhancer.i don´t consider myself natty, due to what i´ve used such as corticosteroids for pain or taking any medicine. No one is now days to be honest.
what i meant to say is non natty approach to achieve a certain muscle improvement/aesthetics/proportions wise… in this fitness/BB/sports field, to be more precise.
is that good enough explanation for you?
And I wasn't trying to be negative, I use steroids. Mk in terms of muscle growth is better then a low dose gh
i can understand what you meant, just was making clear, although i´ve stated that i used mk677 but did not use it correctly.Well, I wasn't looking for a explanation but corticosteroids are not in the same category. Mk677 is a performance enhancer.
I just purchased LGD to use as my first SARM cycle but after reading this thread I may go a different route. I'm 56 and want to go with something that won't affect my balls that's why I choose LGD but after reading this thread I see that's not the case. How would the above mentioned cycle compare to a low dose LGD cycle?Dry joints if e2 gets too low. Clomid ups test and also e2. Thing is, not everyone gets dry joints from low e2 -and not everyone responds to 6-bromo as good. To be on the safe side, do it like 100/100/100/100/50/50/25
Good call on 6-bromo AND proviron. If you can source proviron, no bromo -nor adex needed. Or bromo use very sparingly, like 50mg eod.
If you can afford -and source proviron, take it throughout. Max dose 50mg with clomid (split dose), in PCT 25mg is advised.
If taken at 50mg with clomid, no AI (bromo, adex) needed. If taken at 25mg with clomid , AI sparingly at low dose every few days.
All written here is a bit of guessing, because we all respond differently to anything...see it as a sound guideline. You could also do like:
Clomid 75mg/75/75/50/25/25
Proviron 50/50/50/50/50/25 - 25/25/25
Nothing wrong with that either, or:
Clomid: 75mg/75/75/50/25/25
Bromo: 100/100/100/100/50/50/ -50/50
proviron: 25/25/25/25/25/25/ -25/25/25
Or do clomid 10 weeks -or whatever.
One more thing, if libido drops, joint ache and low e2 is suspected, drop bromo , maybe, up a bit clomid for about 10 days. DHEA would be a good addition, TD, like dermacrine, is a good bet.
Proviron will not cause low e2, IMO. But in conjunction with an AI, maybe.
Here a revised version, note EOD and ED:I just purchased LGD to use as my first SARM cycle but after reading this thread I may go a different route. I'm 56 and want to go with something that won't affect my balls that's why I choose LGD but after reading this thread I see that's not the case. How would the above mentioned cycle compare to a low dose LGD cycle?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
You ever feel that non workout people always stereotype lifters as egotistical? | Training Forum | 26 | ||
Anyone ever cycle non stim pump products? | Supplements | 33 | ||
Aynone ever use TEST 400???? | Anabolics | 13 | ||
why does everyone hate sustanon 250 | Anabolics | 8 | ||
first run ever boldenone good idea bad idea | Anabolics | 8 |