Msten questions:

Well your young man. You jumped right in the deep end w test and tren. Honestly msten is pretty harsh and powerful. It is not banned and still readily available. Some sarms are mild some are not. If I were you I would go the natty route as long as possible.

If your dead set on hormone manipulation I would go back to a test only cycle 4-500 mg for 10-12 weeks w proper ancillaries. Imo this is as safe or safer than a harsh oral cycle with a better outcome and you will feel better.

Some people may not agree w this, but honestly I was 18 my first test e cycle and I can't say I regretted it. I don't recommend what I did. I now need testosterone supplementation as a result of going on and off for years.
 
Godstrength said:
Well your young man. You jumped right in the deep end w test and tren. Honestly msten is pretty harsh and powerful. It is not banned and still readily available. Some sarms are mild some are not. If I were you I would go the natty route as long as possible.

If your dead set on hormone manipulation I would go back to a test only cycle 4-500 mg for 10-12 weeks w proper ancillaries. Imo this is as safe or safer than a harsh oral cycle with a better outcome and you will feel better.

Some people may not agree w this, but honestly I was 18 my first test e cycle and I can't say I regretted it. I don't recommend what I did. I now need testosterone supplementation as a result of going on and off for years.
Click to expand...

Yea I agree with this info. Personally, I don’t think msten is super harsh as long as you got a good all in one cycle support+tudca, but I’d personally go for the test cycle. You could kickstart it with the msten if you really want to.
 
20 years old, 5'9, 230lbs and 13% body fat??? Be happy you have those kind of genetics and skip the hormones for now. No offense but why would you even consider messing with your hormones at your age with stats like that? Are you looking to get into pro bodybuilding?
 
I almost posted about that... I'm 6' 195 @13% and im not small by any means. Those stats are yoked status... If they are correct
 
Yeah as above - if your stats are legit and you’ve only ever run one cycle your a ****ing beast lad......off just 3 years as well !!

What are your lifts?
 
If the lifts match the stats my guess is Arnold and hall went two’s up and this is the result......
 
starryeidolon said:
• I'm 20 years of age.
• 5'9
• 230 pounds, 13% bodyfat
• Trained for 3 years
• Have tren ace + test c experience (my first and only cycle)
• Am aware of General PCT rules, SERMS, etc

First off, I realize a beginner lifter running. tren ace and test c at such a young age with small experience was stupid, it really was.

Though I just want to throw that out there so others can know a bit about me.

Anyways, I have questions about Msten I would like answered if possible.

1: I've researched for a few hours about it, and have read some mixed reviews about it in regards to liver toxicity. Would you say it's overall mild, or an par with superdrol?

2: I understand it's now banned and can't be found anywhere. Though I'm hoping someone can PM me a reliable source? (I understand asking for a source is likely to get me banned, but I'm determined.)

3: Would you say SARMS are more of my game, or Msten? Since I've done a AAS cycle in the past...and again, I realize that was stupid of me. I'm very lucky I'm not on TRT for that.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

You're 20. you have to be 21 to post in the anabolics section. delete the thread before you get banned
 
210LBS said:
20 years old, 5'9, 230lbs and 13% body fat??? Be happy you have those kind of genetics and skip the hormones for now. No offense but why would you even consider messing with your hormones at your age with stats like that? Are you looking to get into pro bodybuilding?
Click to expand...
I'd be willing to bet bodyfat is way off. He would be stage ready and huge at 200 That's pro classic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top