Not trying to argue but why would Msten be unsafe while SD is safe?
Excellent question - when I say “safe for a woman”, that’s brospeak for “these steroids are least likely per mg administered to turn your wife into your husband”. Virilization is always a risk for women, and personal reaction to compounds, dose, and length of cycle are all significant variables (as well as previous acquired permanent masculinization from milder cycles), but generally speaking women who want to avoid as much noticeable change as possible (aside from muscle) would do well to use the least androgenic drugs possible.
Superdrol’s A:A rating is 400:20 in relation to methyltestosterone, while Msten’s is 660:90-170. Those numbers are not perfect real-world representations, but they tend to point you in the right direction: Superdrol is 20 times more anabolic than androgenic per mg, while Msten is about 4-5x. Compared to each other, Msten is essentially 4x more virilizing per mg than Sdrol.
Superdrol is less virilizing in a woman per mg than real Anavar, I have found. And much much stronger obviously.
How would msten and SD compare as far as harshness, id est lipids and liver enzymes? I guess topical or injectable would be a little easier on your bloodwork.
If I had to hazard a bro guess, probably generally similar - they’re terrible for you. Let your personal bloodwork or response to the drugs guide your choices to run them again later.