I do mine sitting down is it still a military press or just a shoulder press
Sent from my HTC EVO
boogyman said:My problem with doing them seated is they lose a lot of functionality. I have never in my life had to lift something heavy over my head while seated.
uvawahoowa said:Right, but seated shoulder press us far more taxing on the shoulders, which is better of that is what one is going for. All depends on goals
Seated shoulder press is far more taxing on your kinetic chain. Terrible exercise imo
Rodja said:Say what?
I'm saying its hard on your lower back
Rodja said:If your technique sucks, but that could be said for many exercises.
Well its far easier to have bad technique on seated as opposed to standing press
Your right, to each his own. I look at the shoulder press as a lift something really heavy over you head movment, not a shoulder exercise.Right, but seated shoulder press us far more taxing on the shoulders, which is better of that is what one is going for. All depends on goals
SLW2 said:If your not standing with your heels touching it is not a military press. You are doing a seated shoulder press.
boogyman said:My problem with doing them seated is they lose a lot of functionality. I have never in my life had to lift something heavy over my head while seated.
Same for flat bench press. How often do you have a flat back when pushing something? Usually you lean forward like the incline bench position. That doesn't mean it's dumb to do flat bench though.
boogyman said:But I do lift heavy things over my head while standing, pretty regularly. So if given the choice on how to train that movement, I think standing is the better option. This has nothing at all to do with benchpressing.
I also think standing presses have more importance than the benchpress.
Just for my own knowledge, is there a significant difference keeping the heels together?
I know what you mean but I'm saying I push things often at work and dont just do incline bench know what I mean