Polish_Oak
Board Supporter
anyone wants to share any insight on this stuff?
Is it worth the $$?
Is it worth the $$?
:icon_lol: love ur response...lets get it , use it , and c what happens...........:hammer:natedogg said:Who knows what the hell it is, but lets buy it anyways!![]()
Max32 said:I am going to put my faith in ALR on this one with his original intended purpose to be an adjunct to meth TRN
xtraflossy said:I thought progestins didnt aromitise????
I really dont know about a test replacement, I think the comparrision is only because A) Its anabolic B) It aromatises (some).
It may be the only "new gen" product that has some aromatization. These two things somehow make it "simular" to test...????
plutoine said:this is what PA said
I think its the 17-methyl ether of trenbolone
which would make it illegal according to the new anabolic steroid acts (which includes ethers of listed substances)
It also would probably be ineffective, because the ether bond will have to be broken. these kind of ethers (saturated alkyl) are not readily broken down by the body
plutoine said:this is what PA said
I think its the 17-methyl ether of trenbolone
which would make it illegal according to the new anabolic steroid acts (which includes ethers of listed substances)
It also would probably be ineffective, because the ether bond will have to be broken. these kind of ethers (saturated alkyl) are not readily broken down by the body
Well in retrospect it look like PA was totally and completely WRONG about Methoxy Trn.plutoine said:this is what PA said
I think its the 17-methyl ether of trenbolone
which would make it illegal according to the new anabolic steroid acts (which includes ethers of listed substances)
It also would probably be ineffective, because the ether bond will have to be broken. these kind of ethers (saturated alkyl) are not readily broken down by the body
Max32 said:wait a second, someone with 1 post quoting PA and bashing ALR......who woulda thunk it..:wtf:
Max32 said:wait a second, someone with 1 post quoting PA and bashing ALR......who woulda thunk it..:wtf:
No, he posted it today and it was regarding Methoxy TSTMr.50 said:I think that is what PA said for M-TRN not M-TST.
Mr.50
jonny21 said:Well in retrospect it look like PA was totally and completely WRONG about Methoxy Trn.
In future it might be a better idea to use valid and factual info when making your presumptions.
bumCakes said:Didn't you hear? PA is the incarnated God, he knows all.:icon_lol:
2nd opinions anybody?
plutoine said:I'm not bashing ALRI at all, simply posting a quote that does not represent my personal opinion in anyway. I mean I did just buy 3 bottles of mega-trn and 3 bottles of tst to go along with it.
No, he posted it today and it was regarding Methoxy TST
Everyone always asks for one of the 'gurus' or someone with extensive scientific/chemical knowledge to chime in (pa is regarded as one of those people)
I noticed his post on musclegurus and thought someone might be interested in hearing it. Sure he may have been completely WRONG about methoxy trn and could be waaaay off here also, but that is for you to decide.
plutoine said:I agree, I would also like to hear other opinions or someone that can shed more light on this compound... just something more concrete than all the speculation
Beowulf said:Speculation is exactly right. Remember the endless accusations about the unethical bastards who came out with M-TRN and HD-50. They were thought to be deadly toxic. Now, it seems, sides are actually quite light relative to effectiveness.
jonny21 said:Well in retrospect it look like PA was totally and completely WRONG about Methoxy Trn.
In future it might be a better idea to use valid and factual info when making your presumptions.
bigblank69 said:I like PA, but he was wrong on Halodrol as well (like most of us), thinking it was a form of halotestin.
If he thinks this is another Tren product I definately think he is wrong, why would you come out with a Tren like product to stack with a .... tren like product?
LCSULLA said:And all you will get is speculation. The only person that can really tell you about TST or TRN is Mr. Rea..thats it. And I don't think he will chime in on this either.
As for PA, he's a smart guy for sure but he lets his emotions cloud his thinking...on a lot of issues.
jminis said:I'm going to have to co-sign with LC on this one. PA know's his stuff, but he's a jack-ass. I don't know too many prods that ALRI puts out that don't get the job done. Only time will tell, I'm hoping to test out TST so my honest opinion will be given. If it's good then I'll say it, if it sucks I'll say that too.
Beowulf said:Speculation is exactly right. Remember the endless accusations about the unethical bastards who came out with M-TRN and HD-50. They were thought to be deadly toxic. Now, it seems, sides are actually quite light relative to effectiveness.
CDB said:True, but in all fairness naming them apparently after tren and halo, well they should have known better, you know? Those ain't the easiest substances to deal with for most people.
I agree that logic suggest that these are harsh based on name, so I could understand the suggestion being brought up; outright condemnation based on unsubstantiated "facts" is a different story. Slight structural differences can produce dramatically different effects. For example, I think M1,4AD and D-Bol are structurally quite similar, yet there effects and toxicity are utterly different (note: I've never tried either)CDB said:True, but in all fairness naming them apparently after tren and halo, well they should have known better, you know? Those ain't the easiest substances to deal with for most people.
thetimbomb said:thats awesome put up the link... anyway though - i wasnt really asking about tst/trn, i know they are synergistic. i was asking if anything else would have a good effect. like SD, halodrol, PP, Pros, Emax