While that is true, I don't think that is what Hypo is inferring to. As we know Doctors don't treat "healthy" people, their goal is to get people back to a "healthy" state, I think Hypo is inferring how to get the best benefits from megadosing Vit C. One of the best benefits of this is cardiovascular health, i.e., the lining of the veins and arteries stay supple and healthy with large doses of Vit C, and I for one take 4gms twice daily when I feel a "bug" coming on along with 2-300mgs Zinc twice daily, I have been cold/flu free for 3+ years since starting this regimen, I need to add that I also wash my hands and use the hand sanitizer stuff many times throughout the day, which definitely helps.jminis said:Honestly easiest way to avoid getting sick is a healthy diet and wash your hands as often as possible.
Or live in a cave with absolutely no human contact whatsoever.jminis said:Honestly easiest way to avoid getting sick is a healthy diet and wash your hands as often as possible.
Airborne along with Cold-eeze has worked for me in the past.DobermanXXL said:echiniacea and aireborne!
vitamin c is toxic at prolonged dosage over 3g/day. symptoms of toxicity are nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrhea; headache, fatigue, insomnia, etc.whosyourdaddy02 said:5G per day really isn't that much. Most people I know who advocate mega dosing (including myself) will do a gram each hour. Just keep tabs on how you feel from it. If you start to get gassy (ie farting alot) or otherwise have loose stools, you're reaching or have exceed saturation and it's time to adjust![]()
LOL there ya go, I usually stick with Vitamin C and zinc when I feel things coming on sometimes it helps sometime it doesn't. For me I'm around a lot of different people all day so getting sick is not hard for me. It sucks but what are ya gonna do.natedogg said:Or live in a cave with absolutely no human contact whatsoever.
The RDI is the amount you need only so you are not deficient. 75mg is no where close to the optimal amount the body needs.chasec said:vitamin c is toxic at prolonged dosage over 3g/day. symptoms of toxicity are nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrhea; headache, fatigue, insomnia, etc.
the RDI for vit.c is only 75mg/day...
I'm sure you have citations to bolster such an unusual claim...given that this is counter to EVERYTHING I've read in the last 30 years on the subject - or do you mean cocaine?chasec said:vitamin c is toxic at prolonged dosage over 3g/day. symptoms of toxicity are nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrhea; headache, fatigue, insomnia, etc.
The RDI for vitamin C (IIRC) is the amount needed to prevent scurvy, plus a slight margin.g4ud1n said:The RDI is the amount you need only so you are not deficient. 75mg is no where close to the optimal amount the body needs.
If anyone finds themselves getting abdominal cramps or diahrrea from their blow, it's definitely time to find a new dealer.BodyWizard said:I'm sure you have citations to bolster such an unusual claim...given that this is counter to EVERYTHING I've read in the last 30 years on the subject - or do you mean cocaine?
Wow, thanks. Are you sure though? So you think self administered home IV's are a bad idea? :hammer:Loki said:And while I'm here: just because Polaquin does something, doesn't mean you should try it at home.
g4ud1n said:The RDI is the amount you need only so you are not deficient. 75mg is no where close to the optimal amount the body needs.
[size=-1]American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 45, 693-703, Copyright © 1987 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc [/size]
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Recommended dietary intakes (RDI) of vitamin C in humans
JA Olson and RE Hodges
[size=-1][/size]Vitamin C is unevenly distributed throughout all body cells and fluids. A total-body pool of 900 mg (5.11 mmol) in an adult male meets the following criteria of a satisfactory vitamin C status: it is threefold higher than one that prevents scurvy, no known health advantages accrue at higher pool sizes, absorption efficiency is high and urinary loss low at appropriate intakes, and a 1-mo reserve allows for periods of low intake or stress. To maintain a suitable body pool in healthy 76-kg men and 62-kg women requires daily intakes (RDI) of 40 mg (227 mumol) and 30 mg (170 mumol), respectively. Reasons for not increasing RDI values to enhance iron absorption and to prevent nitrosamine formation are given. The specific association of normal intakes of dietary vitamin C with cancer is very weak and not quantifiable. Advisable intakes for children, pregnant and lactating women, and the elderly are considered. The present recommendations are in better accord with current information than are the 1980 RDA values.
no jackass; i don't mean cocaine.BodyWizard said:I'm sure you have citations to bolster such an unusual claim...given that this is counter to EVERYTHING I've read in the last 30 years on the subject - or do you mean cocaine?
Vitamin C functions physiologically as a water-soluble antioxidant by virtue of its high reducing power. It is a cofactor for enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of collagen, carnitine, and neurotransmitters in vitro, and it can quench a variety of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in aqueous environments. Evidence for in vivo antioxidant functions of ascorbate include the scavenging of reactive oxidants in activated leukocytes, lung, and gastric mucosa, and diminished lipid peroxidation as measured by urinary isoprostane excretion. To provide antioxidant protection, a Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of 90 mg/day for adult men and 75 mg/day for adult women is set based on the vitamin C intake to maintain near-maximal neutrophil concentration with minimal urinary excretion of ascorbate. Because smoking increases oxidative stress and metabolic turnover of vitamin C, the requirement for smokers is increased by 35 mg/day. Estimates of median dietary intakes of vitamin C for adults are 102 mg/day and 72 mg/day in the United States and Canada, respectively. The Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for adults is set at 2 g/day; the adverse effects upon which the UL is based are osmotic diarrhea and gastrointestinal disturbances.
evidence it is a pro-oxidivehypo said:Study summary from Pubmed:
but it does say high doses (7.5g IV per day, which would be a lot more orally) don't cause pro-oxidative effects. Or are they talking about something different than we are?
lighten up, dude - it was a joke!chasec said:no jackass; i don't mean cocaine.
hypo said:Well I've been taking about a gram an hour and have only very mild GI upset, not enough to even bother me. Considering it's my first day taking it like this I think that's pretty good. I'm pretty interested to see if the megadosing theory works for me.
Loki, is there a thread in which you explain why/how you justify the (your?) use of cocaine? ANd what the hell is lokaine?Loki said:If anyone finds themselves getting abdominal cramps or diahrrea from their blow, it's definitely time to find a new dealer.