Sub7
Member
Back when I first started bodybuilding the consensus was that while bulking, one should eat sufficient carbs and as little fat as possible (as little as needed to stay healthy and avoid deficiencies in steroid production / joint aches and vitamin absorption). We were told that it was a better idea to get the bulk of calories from carbs -while eating plenty of protein- because this would lead to less fat gain compared to a diet with the same number of calories but a greater proportion of those calories coming from fat. The logic was that de novo lypogenesis was a hard process for the body and required lots of extra carbs, while it was easier to simply store fats form the diet as fats (the "fats can store themselves " ideology).
Today, however, I do not see bodybuilders follow this path any longer wile bulking. However, the basic tenets do not seem to have been rejected by science. Nutritionists still say that de novo lypogenesis is a process requiring quite a bit of extra carbs and we still know that fats can store themselves.
So is low fat, high carb bulking still the way to go, or have the scientific foundations of this approach been eroded?
Thanks
Today, however, I do not see bodybuilders follow this path any longer wile bulking. However, the basic tenets do not seem to have been rejected by science. Nutritionists still say that de novo lypogenesis is a process requiring quite a bit of extra carbs and we still know that fats can store themselves.
So is low fat, high carb bulking still the way to go, or have the scientific foundations of this approach been eroded?
Thanks