Lab results are crazy after lgd cycle

Kyle25

New member
Hey guys, so I took a lgd cycle for 8 weeks at 10mg a day. Right around week 6 I started taking mk-677 for 5 days on and 2 days off. I’ve been off lgd for about a week and of course went to get my blood work done about 2 days after my last dose. I got the results back the next day and it showed my estrogen at 30, I was happy. BUT it showed my test at 150!!!! Fucking 150. Now I was retarded and didn’t do baseline blood work but about a year ago my test was give or take around 600. I did not think lgd was this suppressive. I have nolva on hand. Should I do 20/20/10/10? Someone guy told me to jsut take DAA and tribalism and do bloods again In 4 weeks which I was gonna do regardless. What do you guys think?
 
I don’t have experience with sarms but if you’re doing cycles expect to do a pct. Jesus.
 
Kyle25 said:
Hey guys, so I took a lgd cycle for 8 weeks at 10mg a day. Right around week 6 I started taking mk-677 for 5 days on and 2 days off. I’ve been off lgd for about a week and of course went to get my blood work done about 2 days after my last dose. I got the results back the next day and it showed my estrogen at 30, I was happy. BUT it showed my test at 150!!!! Fucking 150. Now I was retarded and didn’t do baseline blood work but about a year ago my test was give or take around 600. I did not think lgd was this suppressive. I have nolva on hand. Should I do 20/20/10/10? Someone guy told me to jsut take DAA and tribalism and do bloods again In 4 weeks which I was gonna do regardless. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

Why did you think it wasn't suppressive??
Brother, ALWAYS research compounds before you put them into your body.

Yes, start the Nolva.
 
LGD was similar to an oral steroid in my experience. Treat it as such in the future. Even effected my liver values...
 
Lgd is definitely supressive as I'm sure you know now, 10mg is a dose that females use, imagine if you did 20-50 like most guys do. Use a serm. Trib and daa are garbage, stop taking advice from whoever told you to use that for pct
 
Renew1 said:
Why did you think it wasn't suppressive??
Brother, ALWAYS research compounds before you put them into your body.

Yes, start the Nolva.
Click to expand...
Not a shot at anyone who replied I really do appreciate them. But a lot of people seem to think i either. Didn’t know it was suppressive, OR wasn’t expecting to have to pct. I knew LGD was suppressive and knew I’d need to pct which is why I have nolvadex on hand. I was really jsut concerned if it was okay to take a SERM when my estrogen is at 30.
 
Kyle25 said:
Not a shot at anyone who replied I really do appreciate them. But a lot of people seem to think i either. Didn’t know it was suppressive, OR wasn’t expecting to have to pct. I knew LGD was suppressive and knew I’d need to pct which is why I have nolvadex on hand. I was really jsut concerned if it was okay to take a SERM when my estrogen is at 30.
Click to expand...

Of course.

Nobody had any idea that was concerning to you.
 
If you have any other possible questions or concerns, please feel free to lay them out here.
(Or you can PM me if you need to).
 
Smont said:
Lgd is definitely supressive as I'm sure you know now, 10mg is a dose that females use, imagine if you did 20-50 like most guys do. Use a serm. Trib and daa are garbage, stop taking advice from whoever told you to use that for pct
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t be surprised if the person who told him to take tribulus and daa also told them that lgd isn’t suppressive haha
 
150 is not a bad number after a suppressive cycle, mine was 44 after a cycle one time and managed to get it back up to 1100 with a proper PCT. You’ll be fine, just do the Nolva for 4-6 weeks.
 
Kyle25 said:
Not a shot at anyone who replied I really do appreciate them. But a lot of people seem to think i either. Didn’t know it was suppressive, OR wasn’t expecting to have to pct. I knew LGD was suppressive and knew I’d need to pct which is why I have nolvadex on hand. I was really jsut concerned if it was okay to take a SERM when my estrogen is at 30.
Click to expand...
SERMs don't suppress/lower estrogen levels. They simply stop estrogen from binding to its respective receptor sites. So yes, a SERM is fine.
 
BBiceps said:
150 is not a bad number after a suppressive cycle, mine was 44 after a cycle one time and managed to get it back up to 1100 with a proper PCT. You’ll be fine, just do the Nolva for 4-6 weeks.
Click to expand...
It is kinda bad for a couple weeks on a sarm, I hope the op friends are smart enough to see his bloods and understand that sarms are not much safer then steroids
 
Imagine if you used something actually potent instead of garbage sarms and got some results as a reward for fking yourself up so much for what i assume to be next to nothing
 
Kyle25 said:
Someone guy told me to jsut take DAA and tribalism and do bloods again In 4 weeks which I was gonna do regardless. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

DAA is a complete waste for testosterone:
Invalid Link Removed

But, Invalid Link Removed is pretty decent. It increases your LH levels so it can benefit you along with Nolva will boost your test levels.

This article should also help you out.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Kyle25 said:
Hey guys, so I took a lgd cycle for 8 weeks at 10mg a day. Right around week 6 I started taking mk-677 for 5 days on and 2 days off. I’ve been off lgd for about a week and of course went to get my blood work done about 2 days after my last dose. I got the results back the next day and it showed my estrogen at 30, I was happy. BUT it showed my test at 150!!!! Fucking 150. Now I was retarded and didn’t do baseline blood work but about a year ago my test was give or take around 600. I did not think lgd was this suppressive. I have nolva on hand. Should I do 20/20/10/10? Someone guy told me to jsut take DAA and tribalism and do bloods again In 4 weeks which I was gonna do regardless. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

Sarms are suppressive. Im on TRT now. Last year i did a stack of LGD 15mg a day and RAD140 16mg a day. After a 2mo cycle i got bloods done, about a week after (didn't get baseline before). My E2 was at like 6 if i remember, very low. My total T was 34 ! Can i prove 100% it was the sarms? No but im pretty sure it was. On that 2mo cycle my bench went from 275 to 335, then within 2mo off cycle it was back down to 275.

I started my 2nd cycle last week of rad140 and YK11, and now being on TRT i should have much more stable gains. After my personal experiences and reading a lot of info, i don't recommend any sarms unless the person is taking a test base, or is aware they will be suppressed and lose most of the gains post cycle. Sarms are anabolic compounds just like typical roids, you body reacts in similar fashion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top