LAB question?

Mperkins

Mperkins

Active member
Before i start asking a question id rather NOT be kicked off so let me ask this... are we allowed to talk about labs? not sources just labs?
 
Slippery one because although many ugl's are carried by various 'sources', they may also have a website of some sort where their products may be available for purchase.
So, even though you innocently drop a ugl's name to verify legitimacy, etc, you may have accidentally just named a source, which could cause the moderator to become angry and force him/her to take disciplinary action.
I have found on this forum, mentioning ugl's should be like mentioning the word Worcestershire. Do it quickly and quietly and hope nobody notices.............
 
Matthersby said:
Slippery one because although many ugl's are carried by various 'sources', they may also have a website of some sort where their products may be available for purchase.
So, even though you innocently drop a ugl's name to verify legitimacy, etc, you may have accidentally just named a source, which could cause the moderator to become angry and force him/her to take disciplinary action.
I have found on this forum, mentioning ugl's should be like mentioning the word Worcestershire. Do it quickly and quietly and hope nobody notices.............
Click to expand...

this is why i asked lol! haha i just am so stuck...i got so many labs and i do my research but since anabolic minds has no sponsors you guy will be more unbiased
 
I think it would be naive to think that a 'steroid and source review' site would be 100% accurate and unbiased. But my 'swole friend' who has read and used only highly rated sites off of a steroid source review site, has never been scammed, got anything bunk, had to wait months, dealt w poor customer service, had a seizure letter, been shorted, received wrong gear. Nothing.... Ever.... Its almost as if, the reviews and percentages of satisfied customers for these sources is ACTUALLY ACCURATE. At least, that's what he tells me. BUT. I could be lying about him lying about the internet site that lies for lying steroid sources.
 
Matthersby said:
I think it would be naive to think that a 'steroid and source review' site would be 100% accurate and unbiased. But my 'swole friend' who has read and used only highly rated sites off of a steroid source review site, has never been scammed, got anything bunk, had to wait months, dealt w poor customer service, had a seizure letter, been shorted, received wrong gear. Nothing.... Ever.... Its almost as if, the reviews and percentages of satisfied customers for these sources is ACTUALLY ACCURATE. At least, that's what he tells me. BUT. I could be lying about him lying about the internet site that lies for lying steroid sources.
Click to expand...

true but id trust you guys over eroids lol.... and i wasnt gunna completely take your word i just wanted a little more insurance while i kept researching! thanks though i guess ill go ask walmart for some gear and clomid
 
Mperkins said:
true but id trust you guys over eroids lol.... and i wasnt gunna completely take your word i just wanted a little more insurance while i kept researching! thanks though i guess ill go ask walmart for some gear and clomid
Click to expand...

They have to get those stats and reviews from somewhere. And most sources ask you to put a review there. And if a company is putting that much resources into their reputation, they probably are putting effort/energy into a decent product too. Just .02
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top