I think I accidentally sounded as though I was disregarding your post B, what I meant was that the first section of the article with the pics is nothing more than a plug for his diet program and didn't have much (if anything) to do with the article.B5150 said:Dave Tate Before - 18-20% bodyfat
This physique was accomplished with lots of hard, heavy lifting, but really poor food choices
Dave Tate After - 8-10% bodyfat
This physique was accomplished with lots of hard and heavy training and very smart food choices (no extreme dieting here). If you want to learn the system that Dave used to make this transformation, check out Precision Nutrition (steroids not included)
:goodpost:ktw said:Berardi is full of himself, but I think that the article is helpful for a lot of people that have no experience with this type of diet.
Nitrox said::goodpost:
Yep just another collage of current diet ideas with an 'extreme' spin on it ('only do this diet once every 104 weeks!'). IMO that diet looks like a recipe for muscle loss.
Gotta love all the Biotest supp recomendations.
You are very correct sir. Please accept an apology on my behalf. Guys, give it a break.ktw said:I never said it was a crazy idea, stop with all the negative crap towards me, I thought this thread would help newer people learn the concept behind low carb dieting.
Only morons would buy all the spin and supplement crap.
Also, T-Nation is owned by Biotest, why would you expect anything different? You think I would reccomend following their reccomendations? Hell no, just useful advice for first timers that always post obvious diet questions.
Everyone needs to calm down about this.