Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Ipamorelin and GFR 1-29

I've used them but not particularly for sleep, don't really recall improved sleep on those 2.

Ipam with cjc dac and mk is probably the best sleep stack your gonna get from peptides. Outside of actual gh.
 
Smont said:
I've used them but not particularly for sleep, don't really recall improved sleep on those 2.

Ipam with cjc dac and mk is probably the best sleep stack your gonna get from peptides. Outside of actual gh.
Click to expand...

What did you use them for, and what benefits did you notice from them?
 
muddertougher said:
What did you use them for, and what benefits did you notice from them?
Click to expand...
Was just trying out various peptides on cycle to increase gh. I've used ipam a few times, on its own and combined with other stuff. By itself but more specifically with cjc dac it improved recovery and helped put on some size in my opinion. Keep in mind I was on cycle, idk if it's gonna put size on without anabolics in the picture. Gfr 1-29/sermorelin I didn't notice much if anything at the time.
 
I've been using ipa and grf 1-29 with good results in terms of deeper sleep, recovery, and fat loss. But, when I ran out, I went with separate CJC 1295 w/DAC and Ipa and it's been much better. I know many people say to not use DAC because it doesn't mimic natural pulse of GH, but I don't have the time to inject multiple times a day and feel the sustained release of CJC 1295 is making this more effective.
 
kisaj said:
I've been using ipa and grf 1-29 with good results in terms of deeper sleep, recovery, and fat loss. But, when I ran out, I went with separate CJC 1295 w/DAC and Ipa and it's been much better. I know many people say to not use DAC because it doesn't mimic natural pulse of GH, but I don't have the time to inject multiple times a day and feel the sustained release of CJC 1295 is making this more effective.
Click to expand...
I'm actually on the other side of the fence then most. I tell ppl only to use the dac version. I find it much more effective and I've yet to see a single negative from choosing dac over no dac
 
Smont said:
I'm actually on the other side of the fence then most. I tell ppl only to use the dac version. I find it much more effective and I've yet to see a single negative from choosing dac over no dac
Click to expand...

I may be a convert myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top