Inhibit-E did not do a damn thing for my Estrogen. - Correction, it actually has given me the perfect test to estrogen ratio!

I'm on TRT taking 100mg a week and from this month's bloodwork, my test levels are at 814 with the range being 348 - 1197 but my estrogen levels are still high being at 62 with the normal range being 8 - 43. Back in August when I had bloodwork done, my test levels were at 708 and estrogen at 61. I started taking Inhibit-E back in August and have been taking it daily since then. After seeing this month's bloodwork, I thought Inhibit-E wasn't working but after seeing @sns8778 response, I stand corrected. It actually has given me the perfect balance between my testosterone and estrogen, a 13:1 ratio. Now I would have thought that my endocrinologist would have caught that ratio but she didn't which tells me I need to find a new one.
 
Last edited:
How do you know it would not have risen more than 1 point if you weren't taking Inhibit-E?
 
So your estrogen levels are above normal range, but how do you feel?

What is your injection frequency for the week?
 
So your estrogen levels are above normal range, but how do you feel?

What is your injection frequency for the week?
I feel good, not lethargic at all like I used to and my sex drive has slowly come back a little. I only inject once a week. The bloodwork is always done 4 days after my injection.
 
I'm on TRT taking 100mg a week and from this month's bloodwork, my test levels are at 814 with the range being 348 - 1197 but my estrogen levels are still high being at 62 with the normal range being 8 - 43. Back in August when I had bloodwork done, my test levels were at 708 and estrogen at 61. I started taking Inhibit-E back in August and have been taking it daily since then. After seeing this month's bloodwork, I was very disappointed to see that my estrogen went UP a point which tells me that Inhibit-E doesn't work! I'm a bit pissed off about this since I've heard good things about Inhibit-E which is why I started taking it only to find out that it doesn't do a damn thing for reducing estrogen. So I asked my endocrinologist if she can prescribe my an estrogen blocker, something like Arimidex, Aromasin, or Letrozole and you know what she told me, she doesn't prescribe estrogen blockers because they can be more harmful than good and that it can counteract my testosterone injections. WTF!!! She said the only way to reduce my estrogen is to reduce my injections and I told her that I don't want to do that because I like where I am at. So I'm now looking for a new endocrinologist for a second opinion or is she right and I'm just overacting?

Don't take anything I'm saying as being negative, I'm genuinely trying to help.

We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E because it is designed to help reduce estrogen levels without crashing them, stave off estrogen increases, and promote optimal testosterone to estrogen ratio.

There is a lot of context that you're not thinking about properly or realizing for this.

August:
  • Testosterone - 708
  • Estrogen - 61
December:
  • Testosterone - 814
  • Estrogen - 62
Think about that in context:
  • Your testosterone increased 15% (708 x .15 = 106; 708 + 106 = 814)
  • Your estrogen increased slightly over 1%
Your testosterone levels went up over 15% and your estrogen went up 1%.

Your testosterone to estrogen ratio breakdown:
  • August - Testosterone 708, Estrogen 61 = 11.6 to 1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
  • December - Testosterone 814, Estrogen 62 = 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
Your testosterone to estrogen ratio improved from 11.6:1 to 13:1 and did so even with your testosterone levels going up by 15%!

That's not a bad thing - it's actually pretty incredible.

I'm not sure if you know this, but a 13:1 ratio is considered by many leading endocrinologists to be the ideal testosterone to estrogen ratio, especially as relates to libido, cognitive function, and mood.

Think about this for a minute:
You're pissed and posted a negative thread bashing a product that allowed you to be able to increase your testosterone levels by 15% (106 points) while elevating your estrogen by only 1% (1 point) and take you from an 11.6:1 to a 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

If you were looking at this from a scientific point of view, that is dang near perfect bc it did everything a person could ask for - it helped stave off an increase in estrogen levels while on HRT and significantly increasing your testosterone levels AND put you into the ideal 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

You posted a pissed off post bashing the product that by the numbers is actually an excellent testimonial for the product doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
 
Last edited:
Don't take anything I'm saying as being negative, I'm genuinely trying to help.

We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E because it is designed to help reduce estrogen levels without crashing them, stave off estrogen increases, and promote optimal testosterone to estrogen ratio.

There is a lot of context that you're not thinking about properly or realizing for this.

August:
  • Testosterone - 708
  • Estrogen - 61
December:
  • Testosterone - 814
  • Estrogen - 62
Think about that in context:
  • Your testosterone increased 15% (708 x .15 = 106; 708 + 106 = 814)
  • Your estrogen increased slightly over 1%
Your testosterone levels went up over 15% and your estrogen went up 1%.

Your testosterone to estrogen ratio breakdown:
  • August - Testosterone 708, Estrogen 61 = 11.6 to 1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
  • December - Testosterone 814, Estrogen 62 = 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
Your testosterone to estrogen ration improved from 11.6:1 to 13:1 and did so even with your testosterone levels going up by 15%!

That's not a bad thing - it's actually pretty incredible.

I'm not sure if you know this, but a 13:1 ratio is considered by many leading endocrinologists to be the ideal testosterone to estrogen ratio, especially as relates to libido, cognitive function, and mood.

Think about this for a minute:
You're pissed and posted a negative thread bashing a product that allowed you to be able to increase your testosterone levels by 15% (106 points) while elevating your estrogen by only 1% (1 point) and take you from an 11.6:1 to a 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

If you were looking at this from a scientific point of view, that is dang near perfect bc it did everything a person could ask for - it helped stave off an increase in estrogen levels while on HRT and significantly increasing your testosterone levels AND put you into the ideal 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

You posted a pissed off post bashing the product that by the numbers is actually an excellent testimonial for the product doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
F@@k me! When you put it that way (scienticically/mathematically) you have a point. I would have thought that my endocrinologist would have picked up on that but I guess not. All she wants to do is lower my weekly intake.
 
Don't take anything I'm saying as being negative, I'm genuinely trying to help.

We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E because it is designed to help reduce estrogen levels without crashing them, stave off estrogen increases, and promote optimal testosterone to estrogen ratio.

There is a lot of context that you're not thinking about properly or realizing for this.

August:
  • Testosterone - 708
  • Estrogen - 61
December:
  • Testosterone - 814
  • Estrogen - 62
Think about that in context:
  • Your testosterone increased 15% (708 x .15 = 106; 708 + 106 = 814)
  • Your estrogen increased slightly over 1%
Your testosterone levels went up over 15% and your estrogen went up 1%.

Your testosterone to estrogen ratio breakdown:
  • August - Testosterone 708, Estrogen 61 = 11.6 to 1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
  • December - Testosterone 814, Estrogen 62 = 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
Your testosterone to estrogen ration improved from 11.6:1 to 13:1 and did so even with your testosterone levels going up by 15%!

That's not a bad thing - it's actually pretty incredible.

I'm not sure if you know this, but a 13:1 ratio is considered by many leading endocrinologists to be the ideal testosterone to estrogen ratio, especially as relates to libido, cognitive function, and mood.

Think about this for a minute:
You're pissed and posted a negative thread bashing a product that allowed you to be able to increase your testosterone levels by 15% (106 points) while elevating your estrogen by only 1% (1 point) and take you from an 11.6:1 to a 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

If you were looking at this from a scientific point of view, that is dang near perfect bc it did everything a person could ask for - it helped stave off an increase in estrogen levels while on HRT and significantly increasing your testosterone levels AND put you into the ideal 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

You posted a pissed off post bashing the product that by the numbers is actually an excellent testimonial for the product doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
perfectly answered right here. You said you don't feel lethargic or get many high estrogen symptoms so that means that it isn't really concerningly high. Contrary to popular belief as a man you want the highest estrogen possible that doesn't give you side effects (Gyno, and so on) because estrogen is very neuroprotective and helps counteract some of the negative effects testosterone can give, your fine don't worry. More plates more dates made a good video on this, If I recall correctly the best T to E ratio is 13:1.
 
I don't buy into 13-1 being a ideal ratio, ratios always seem to be person dependant and if my testosterone is 3009 I most certainly don't want a 231 estrogen. Random #'s but you get my point.

On another note, If your test went up a hundred points and your estrogen only went up one point then something was working to control estrogen. When testosterone levels go up, so do estrogen, it's not in liner fashion but your estrogen would have gone up a good bit more then a point with all other factors being equal
 
Don't take anything I'm saying as being negative, I'm genuinely trying to help.

We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E because it is designed to help reduce estrogen levels without crashing them, stave off estrogen increases, and promote optimal testosterone to estrogen ratio.

There is a lot of context that you're not thinking about properly or realizing for this.

August:
  • Testosterone - 708
  • Estrogen - 61
December:
  • Testosterone - 814
  • Estrogen - 62
Think about that in context:
  • Your testosterone increased 15% (708 x .15 = 106; 708 + 106 = 814)
  • Your estrogen increased slightly over 1%
Your testosterone levels went up over 15% and your estrogen went up 1%.

Your testosterone to estrogen ratio breakdown:
  • August - Testosterone 708, Estrogen 61 = 11.6 to 1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
  • December - Testosterone 814, Estrogen 62 = 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio
Your testosterone to estrogen ratio improved from 11.6:1 to 13:1 and did so even with your testosterone levels going up by 15%!

That's not a bad thing - it's actually pretty incredible.

I'm not sure if you know this, but a 13:1 ratio is considered by many leading endocrinologists to be the ideal testosterone to estrogen ratio, especially as relates to libido, cognitive function, and mood.

Think about this for a minute:
You're pissed and posted a negative thread bashing a product that allowed you to be able to increase your testosterone levels by 15% (106 points) while elevating your estrogen by only 1% (1 point) and take you from an 11.6:1 to a 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

If you were looking at this from a scientific point of view, that is dang near perfect bc it did everything a person could ask for - it helped stave off an increase in estrogen levels while on HRT and significantly increasing your testosterone levels AND put you into the ideal 13:1 testosterone to estrogen ratio.

You posted a pissed off post bashing the product that by the numbers is actually an excellent testimonial for the product doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
Definitely
 
I feel good, not lethargic at all like I used to and my sex drive has slowly come back a little. I only inject once a week. The bloodwork is always done 4 days after my injection.

I don't buy into 13-1 being a ideal ratio, ratios always seem to be person dependant and if my testosterone is 3009 I most certainly don't want a 231 estrogen. Random #'s but you get my point.

On another note, If your test went up a hundred points and your estrogen only went up one point then something was working to control estrogen. When testosterone levels go up, so do estrogen, it's not in liner fashion but your estrogen would have gone up a good bit more then a point with all other factors being equal
He is dosing 100mg once a week splitting it up would help as well correct?

I know you have way more knowledge on this than I do.
 
He is dosing 100mg once a week splitting it up would help as well correct?

I know you have way more knowledge on this than I do.
Typically yes, increasing your frequency without increasing the total dose will lower your estrogen. Instead of a 100mg's causing its spike you would have 15mg a day or 30 every other day and that would give smaller spikes in test and less estrogen conversion as a whole. Thsts most people, I'm sure there's exceptions to the rule.
 
"We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E"

that is the biggest pile of horseshit you have ever posted on here wtf seriously?
 
I am not here to cast aspersions at anyone, but I'd like to offer my observation.

I understand someone wanting to verify the accuracy of information; and rightly so. On the other hand, when I believed something was misstated or misleading - I've asked for clarification or maybe substantiation. That, in my opinion, is much different than alleging that someone was lying.

Unless I knew, with certainty, that someone was intentionally misleading with a statement or comment - I wouldn't call them out publicly - unless/until I tried to resolve that via PM.

FWIW - I have found Steve to be nothing but credible in all of my (many) dealings with him.

That being said, I do not have experience with this product, only with Steve - as a credible (to me) person. I am not in this to start a pissing contest, but felt an obligation to share my (I hope, well reasoned) thoughts.
 
"We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E"

that is the biggest pile of horseshit you have ever posted on here wtf seriously?

You have some weird fascination with posting negative stuff towards me and making yourself look pretty foolish in the process bc you act like you know a lot about things that you know nothing about.

I think in your mind, just because I take time to help people here on AM, that you have some weird perception about us as a company and picture the company as just me or something.

We are an FDA registered cGMP supplement company and also have a 20k sq foot warehousing and distribution facility where we do warehousing and shipping for a lot of other brands. That’s public knowledge and known by most other company owners on here.

It’s pretty common knowledge that we get a lot of referrals from doctors. We make a lot of comprehensive formulas, use a lot of branded ingredients, and meet or exceed all cGMP testing guidelines - things that a lot of doctors look for in a supplement brand.

It’s odd that you would even think that’s odd bc it’s pretty common knowledge. It’s been mentioned by Stack3d and by various other industry news sources for years, and it’s even the way we are categorized in some industry business to business publications. Heck, there’s even a major chiropractic distributor that distributes our products to practitioners for resale.

Also, even if you didn’t know any of that, it’s been mentioned on here by other members that have been surprised or thought it was interesting that doctors they had seen mentioned us. And one member here had their doctor contact me about questions about estrogen management on TRT and they’ve referred to us ever since. You can research and find that for yourself.

As much as you seem to dislike me, you’re in for a rough few months coming up with all the talk our new releases are going to get on different sites. And if you somehow still believe we don’t get a lot of physician referrals you might need to take a nerve pill or something when the vision product comes out later in 2025 bc the development process has included specialists at a major university eye center.

The @Admin knows most of this and can verify it.

And @delsolrob is a competing company owner that posts here that can verify it as well.

I don’t like to be rude to anyone, so please kindly keep your ignorant remarks and insults to yourself, bc they just wind up making you look foolish.
 
Last edited:
You have some weird fascination with posting negative stuff towards me and making yourself look pretty foolish in the process bc you act like you know a lot about things that you know nothing about.

I think in your mind, just because I take time to help people here on AM, that you have some weird perception about us as a company and picture the company as just me or something.

We are an FDA registered cGMP supplement company and also have a 20k sq foot warehousing and distribution facility where we do warehousing and shipping for a lot of other brands. That’s public knowledge and known by most other company owners on here.

It’s pretty common knowledge that we get a lot of referrals from doctors. We make a lot of comprehensive formulas, use a lot of branded ingredients, and meet or exceed all cGMP testing guidelines - things that a lot of doctors look for in a supplement brand.

It’s odd that you would even think that’s odd bc it’s pretty common knowledge. It’s been mentioned by Stack3d and by various other industry news sources for years, and it’s even the way we are categorized in some industry business to business publications. Heck, there’s even a major chiropractic distributor that distributes our products to practitioners for resale.

Also, even if you didn’t know any of that, it’s been mentioned on here by other members that have been surprised or thought it was interesting that doctors they had seen mentioned us. And one member here had their doctor contact me about questions about estrogen management on TRT and they’ve referred to us ever since. You can research and find that for yourself.

As much as you seem to dislike me, you’re in for a rough few months coming up with all the talk our new releases are going to get on different sites. And if you somehow still believe we don’t get a lot of physician referrals you might need to take a nerve pill or something when the vision product comes out later in 2025 bc the development process has included specialists at a major university eye center.

The @Admin knows most of this and can verify it.

And @delsolrob is a competing company owner that posts here that can verify it as well.

I don’t like to be rude to anyone, so please kindly keep your ignorant remarks and insults to yourself, bc they just wind up making you look foolish.
Sounds like my wallet is going to take a beating in 2025
 
Sooo....basically without inhibit E estrogen would be higher than it was with?

Oh. lol
"We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E"

that is the biggest pile of horseshit you have ever posted on here wtf seriously?

Quiet son. Adults are talking.
 
Sooo....basically without inhibit E estrogen would be higher than it was with?

Yes. His estrogen was already slightly high if just going off the bloodwork scale before starting Inhibit-E. After starting it, his testosterone levels went up by another 106 points with his estrogen only going up by 1 point, which is pretty awesome by itself, but it also improved his testosterone to estrogen ratio.

I’m glad was able to help him understand that the improvements he had on it were actually pretty incredible and I appreciate him acknowledging that and also changing the thread title to reflect it.

I hope this thread will also help some others on TRT realize how much of a significant benefit Inhibit-E can have when added to TRT.
 
Injection frequency is by far the best way to control estrogen.

Pharmaceutical aromatase inhibitors can be a nightmare to dial in. I've crashed estrogen before and man it was rough.

I always had estrogen issues on 120mg a week. It would consistently keep climbing up. I was doing 60mg Tuesday/Saturday.

I swapped to doing 40mg Tuesday/Thursday/Sunday and my e2 is now perfect. It never climbs anymore. I even added in 500iu HCG a week jabbed on the same days as my testosterone and my e2 is still perfect. Haven't touched an aromatase inhibitor for months now.

Change frequency first before throwing any extra drugs in. Anastrazole/Aromasin also made me feel like mould even when my e2 was in check also. They also lower your HDL even more than just test alone.
 
Even if you were lying about such things, which you are NOT, WHY would someone lie on here? I love this place as much as the next guy or even more so but we represent a SMALL % of SNS sales in total, so convincing us of something that is false to what sell a handful of bottles of one of your lowest priced items in the entire line? LOL, wow what a genius conman you would make Steve lol. FFS

For the record I took my Inhibit-E this AM...unless I am lying....
 
"We get a lot of endocrinologist and HRT clinic referrals for Inhibit-E"

that is the biggest pile of horseshit you have ever posted on here wtf seriously?
I don't know why you are acting like a dick towards Steve because the bloodwork doesn't lie, Inhibit-E works which is why they get a lot of referrals.
 
Back
Top