Igf-ii

[bblankens]

Does anyone have any experience using IgF-II for research purposes? Any input would be appriciated such as protocals, length of use, results? Thanks.

 

[jwrdeals]

bump????

 

[MentalTwitch]

why not just used the IGF-1? It has alot of hands on people backing it.

 

[bblankens]

Oh I'm not questioninng wheather to use it over IGF-1, I"m just wondering if anyone has any experience with IGF II. It seems my answer is a no. IGF-1 is tried and true in caparison to Igf-II with hands on experience. It does seem to be a need though that someone may or should try using IGF II in their research. Thanks everyone!

 

[MentalTwitch]

Oh I'm not questioninng wheather to use it over IGF-1, I"m just wondering if anyone has any experience with IGF II. It seems my answer is a no. IGF-1 is tried and true in caparison to Igf-II with hands on experience. It does seem to be a need though that someone may or should try using IGF II in their research. Thanks everyone!

well you said it..go for it bro! Just find as much info on it as possible and see if itd be worth it. I looked a bit ago but i figured as i mentioned, just go witht he tested goods.

goodluck, keep us updated.

 

[bblankens]

will do!

 

[justreading]

Does anyone have any experience using IgF-II for research purposes? Any input would be appriciated such as protocals, length of use, results? Thanks.

You do NOOOOOT want to use IGFII! It is the primary growth factor of intestine growth. Think ronnie coleman gut in a bottle.

 

[bblankens]

Where did you get this information? From others experience or literature, or etc.?

 

[justreading]

Where did you get this information? From others experience or literature, or etc.?

Studies... its fact but im not going to go did it up sorry

 

[pumbertot]

Studies... its fact but im not going to go did it up sorry

you are correct. this has been addressed before. also iirc, binding proteins would shut it down way quicker than rIGF, beacuse, again iirc, it is most active in neonatals not in adults.