Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

IGF-1 LG3

Why peptides you use should be from a recombinant DNA source and not a chemically synthesized source

I want to bring something up about peptides and peptide quality. I see many people going the cheap route but there is a reason that they may be simply wasting their money. That is why I wanted to start a thread about an issue I think is going on related to efficacy of chemically synthesized IGF and most other peptides vs. recombinantly made ones.

There are many threads on here about IGF-1 and other peps giving good gains and I feel some of it may be BS or the person is having a "placebo affect", while others swear peptides are a complete scam and do nothing at all! (not true)... There might be a reason your igf1 cycle didn't give you jack ****?

Why?

I believe most are purchasing IGF-1 (for an example of a popular peptide being used) made by cheap peptide synthesis companies. However, chemical synthesis of IGF-1 lacks the correct disulfide bonds that cause the proper folding and function in the peptide chain. IGF-1 and its many analogs require 3 disulfide bonds to generate the correct folded form of the protein and this can only be accomplished in the body as naturally produced, or in E.coli bacteria as a recombinant source which is similar to how HGH is made (recombinantly).

Insulin is also very similar to the structure of IGF-1 and it also is inactive and/or unstable if synthesized chemically, it has to be made recombinantly or extracted from a biologic source (they used to extract insulin from bovine and HGH from cadavers).
Made with "recombinant DNA" means it is made in bacteria which have data input into it and "fermented" create enzymes that make these intramolecular disulfide bonds so that the protein folds into the right configuration and has the biological function it is supposed to have, having the proper amino chain is NOT enough and it is NOT that simple!

If you look into human clinical trials or current clinical treatment of patients, they now use some of these peptides as part of a therapy protocol and they use recombinant DNA made peptides, not chemically synthesized ones and for good reason.

Here is just one of many studies on how important the correct bonds are, not just the structure>
Invalid Link Removed > Invalid Link Removed


There are many cheap peptide sellers popping out like CRAZY the last couple years with ridiculously low prices that just doesn't make any sense. So I say if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is!
There is a reason some places are so cheap while others can cost more than 2X or 3X the amount of the cheaper places.

You usually get what you pay for so PLEASE do your research first!

Just because it's pricy doesn't automatically mean its top quality, you still need to research the company.
But if it is really cheap then I would just avoid it because the chances of it being properly made are minimal in this case. IMO

There is a flood of shotty quality peptides coming from china, BE SAFE AND AVOID!

What you want is the more expensive recombinant DNA made peptides! NOT the cheaply made, unstable and largely biologically inactive chemically synthesized peptides!

Many don't even have a clue about all this and that is why I am posting this thread.

Hope it helps someone!


Cheers


 
Why peptides you use should be from a recombinant DNA source and not a chemically synthesized source

I want to bring something up about peptides and peptide quality. I see many people going the cheap route but there is a reason that they may be simply wasting their money. That is why I wanted to start a thread about an issue I think is going on related to efficacy of chemically synthesized IGF and most other peptides vs. recombinantly made ones.

There are many threads on here about IGF-1 and other peps giving good gains and I feel some of it may be BS or the person is having a "placebo affect", while others swear peptides are a complete scam and do nothing at all! (not true)... There might be a reason your igf1 cycle didn't give you jack ****?

Why?

I believe most are purchasing IGF-1 (for an example of a popular peptide being used) made by cheap peptide synthesis companies. However, chemical synthesis of IGF-1 lacks the correct disulfide bonds that cause the proper folding and function in the peptide chain. IGF-1 and its many analogs require 3 disulfide bonds to generate the correct folded form of the protein and this can only be accomplished in the body as naturally produced, or in E.coli bacteria as a recombinant source which is similar to how HGH is made (recombinantly).

Insulin is also very similar to the structure of IGF-1 and it also is inactive and/or unstable if synthesized chemically, it has to be made recombinantly or extracted from a biologic source (they used to extract insulin from bovine and HGH from cadavers).
Made with "recombinant DNA" means it is made in bacteria which have data input into it and "fermented" create enzymes that make these intramolecular disulfide bonds so that the protein folds into the right configuration and has the biological function it is supposed to have, having the proper amino chain is NOT enough and it is NOT that simple!

If you look into human clinical trials or current clinical treatment of patients, they now use some of these peptides as part of a therapy protocol and they use recombinant DNA made peptides, not chemically synthesized ones and for good reason.

There are many cheap peptide sellers popping out like CRAZY the last couple years with ridiculously low prices that just doesn't make any sense. So I say if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is!
There is a reason some places are so cheap while others can cost more than 2X or 3X the amount of the cheaper places.

You usually get what you pay for so PLEASE do your research first!

Just because it's pricy doesn't automatically mean its top quality, you still need to research the company.
But if it is really cheap then I would just avoid it because the chances of it being properly made are minimal in this case. IMO

There is a flood of shotty quality peptides coming from china, BE SAFE AND AVOID!

What you want is the more expensive recombinant DNA made peptides! NOT the cheaply made, unstable and largely biologically inactive chemically synthesized peptides!

Many don't even have a clue about all this and that is why I am posting this thread.

Hope it helps someone!


Cheers


Nice read!
 
Great info!
I would had used cem and prob will have too if the GWP is crap. Only went with them for cost reason... CEM is expensive, to run there stuff I would spend close to 200-300 every 7 or so weeks... I'm sure like everything in life you get what you pay for, but I'm hoping I luck out on this one
 
Great info Blergs!
I am very well versed in aas use, effects and so on. Peptides is newer for me and while I have some book knowledge I prefer to share when i have both knowledge and experience with something. I do not have that yet with all peptides. Guys like FueledPassion and yourself are helping me tremendously with my venture into the peptide realm. Thanks!
ps- I sent you a pm with some questions!
 
Great news...stuff I got seems legit...pinned 100 of each and felt tingles, little bit of the sweats and major hunger...like sick hungry... pinned post work out and same result... can't wait to see this ride through
 
Anyone get fat from igf-1 lr3? I'm running it now at 30mcg post work-out split at 15mcg 15 mcg in each side in the trained muscle. Did that for a week now together with 1.5 IU GH in the morning and 1.5IU after work-out.

It gives me unstoppable sweet cravings... and if I do not eat sweets then getting dizzy, sweats, strong heart beats, sleepiness... I'm afraid to continue with this stuff.

Someone experienced something like it? Seems to be hypoglycemia or something...

I always have 50g protein shake after work-out and proper meal 30-60mins after with 50g protein and 50g carbs.
 
Yes Iv used it a bunch of times. i us emostly 2 places, one is now a sponsor here for for research id rec CEM. I rec LR3 at 40-80mcg ed for 4-8 weeks IMO
 
Yes Iv used it a bunch of times. i us emostly 2 places, one is now a sponsor here for for research id rec CEM. I rec LR3 at 40-80mcg ed for 4-8 weeks IMO

How do you feel about Hardcore Peptides? Have you tried them out?
 
How do you feel about Hardcore Peptides? Have you tried them out?

Probably looking more for someone with exp with their IGF but CJC w/dac was good and their research liquids have all been good to me so far. I'm scared to try anyones IGF.
 
For those who have used mod 1-29 and ghrp2, how long till you notice body composition changes? I assume it's months
 
How do you feel about Hardcore Peptides? Have you tried them out?

i would not touch them. IMO....
I rec CEM products (sponsor here now too), a bit more cost for alot more quality IMO.
these small shops come and go for a reason.. CEM i think been around like 11 years or something, I use them for about 8 myself without issues.
 
i would not touch them. IMO....
I rec CEM products (sponsor here now too), a bit more cost for alot more quality IMO.
these small shops come and go for a reason.. CEM i think been around like 11 years or something, I use them for about 8 myself without issues.

Thanks for the feedback.
 
i would not touch them. IMO....
I rec CEM products (sponsor here now too), a bit more cost for alot more quality IMO.
these small shops come and go for a reason.. CEM i think been around like 11 years or something, I use them for about 8 myself without issues.
CEM's been around that long? Does any other company come close to that?
 
CEM's been around that long? Does any other company come close to that?

Yes a few do but it's against the rules to name them as they are not sponsors here.
 
For those who have used mod 1-29 and ghrp2, how long till you notice body composition changes? I assume it's months

No, if used properly, fat loss should be noticeable and immediate.

It takes about 3hrs for GH to release fatty acids into the blood stream. This implies that u need at least 4-6 hrs of fasting to see significant fat burning from the GH. Take ur peps at night and be generous. Wake up and take another dose and do some cardio. Drink BCAA's afterwards and fast til mid-morning.

Do that for a week and you'll see changes.
 
No, if used properly, fat loss should be noticeable and immediate.

It takes about 3hrs for GH to release fatty acids into the blood stream. This implies that u need at least 4-6 hrs of fasting to see significant fat burning from the GH. Take ur peps at night and be generous. Wake up and take another dose and do some cardio. Drink BCAA's afterwards and fast til mid-morning.

Do that for a week and you'll see changes.
may try it like this later in day next spring actually! funny u post that up. cept ill have a normal shake with water, i cant go on empty personally.

cool thread though!
 
Back
Top