R1187 said:I believe they're supposed to be "dry" compounds, but I was wondering if they result in a "bloated" look?
I'm not a huge guy. I'd like to be bigger, but I also want to keep my vascularity, striations, etc.
I just hate the bloated look.
R1187 said:hmmm
Well it's my 3rd cycle.
Maybe I should take SD and bridge it into epi.
I already have all the bottles just need to reorder some nolva
SD bridging to epi doesn't sound fun. Maybe like epi and stano would be good. Or epi and androhard. If you're feeling ballsy. Sd, Trenazone, with stano and alphamass. That sounds joocy
R1187 said:I really want to try SD this time around.
I plan to take it for 4 or 5 weeks and start another compound a couple weeks in and extend it out for a total cycle of 7 weeks or so.
I know epi is also a methyl, beyond that, what would be wrong with using it with SD?
I will look into those other suggestions. Some of those I have not heard of.
Too many compounds not enough time, haha.
Dr.Stri8ed said:An SD/Epi bridge is great bro.
ReyMan said:My liver is doneskies after an SD cycle, I wouldn't want to continue to put strain on it with epi. Plus why run two dht derivatives
Dr.Stri8ed said:Cuz epi is the sh*t.
ReyMan said:It definitely is. It would be good to bridge to get cut but there are probably better options than bridging methyls
I believe they're supposed to be "dry" compounds, but I was wondering if they result in a "bloated" look?
I'm not a huge guy. I'd like to be bigger, but I also want to keep my vascularity, striations, etc.
I just hate the bloated look.