Does anyone have a favorite creatine or one that seems to be better then the rest? I currently use plain monohydrate
HCl is best, though I like MusclePharm's core series Creatine; it has 5 different kinds in a 5 gram scoop, 100 servings, and it's like less than $25 a canister
Im not an advocate of ethyl ester bro, Hydrochloride. And yeah mono has more research because it's been around a lot longer. Monohydrate just isn't my favorite because it's bloates me hard as f*** whereas it's been proven that HCl supplements your natural creatine flow in a less unnatural way. But when taking mono, i only use micronized. The increase in surface area increases it's usage
Monohydrate is perfectly fine, keep it as is
Only way it gets better is via synergy, with methyl donors or other goodies. Write up on Ergonine has the bigger ones mentioned and references
Just don't waste your money on fancy forms of creatine itself
Does anyone recommend time off of creatine or should it be used year round
Monohydrate is perfectly fine, keep it as is
Only way it gets better is via synergy, with methyl donors or other goodies. Write up on Ergonine has the bigger ones mentioned and references
Just don't waste your money on fancy forms of creatine itself
Does anyone recommend time off of creatine or should it be used year round
Year round. Some people do cycle on and off of it, but there is no reason that I've seen yet to do so.
How do you dose monohydrate and HCL? I've found that a lot of people will load monohydrate at 10-20g per day when they first start taking it, but will only take a few grams of HCL when they first start taking it, so it doesn't surprise me that a lot of people complain about bloating with monohydrate vs other forms of creatine (not saying that you do this, just mentioning that it seems to be fairly common).Im not an advocate of ethyl ester bro, Hydrochloride. And yeah mono has more research because it's been around a lot longer. Monohydrate just isn't my favorite because it's bloates me hard as f*** whereas it's been proven that HCl supplements your natural creatine flow in a less unnatural way. But when taking mono, i only use micronized. The increase in surface area increases it's usage
Maybe it's just because our bodies are different?
How do you dose monohydrate and HCL? I've found that a lot of people will load monohydrate at 10-20g per day when they first start taking it, but will only take a few grams of HCL when they first start taking it, so it doesn't surprise me that a lot of people complain about bloating with monohydrate vs other forms of creatine (not saying that you do this, just mentioning that it seems to be fairly common).
I know, I was trying to say that a lot of people complain about monohydrate because they unnecessarily take too much, as loading is not needed.No need to load it. Back in the mid 90s when I first started using creatine, everybody was giving directions about loading and taking with a carb source. I remember something weird about suggestions to use grape juice with it too. Loading always made me feel bloated, but I've had much more success just taking it without a loading period.
I know, I was trying to say that a lot of people complain about monohydrate because they unnecessarily take too much, as loading is not needed.
Maybe it's just because our bodies are different?
Maybe it's just because our bodies are different?
Maybe you are just more susceptible to placebo effects from things that come in shiny packages.
Yeah I never take any supplement expecting it to work. No placebo effects for me.
It's not possible to take out all variables and assumptions. I'm not sure if you're joking though.No, I'm just awesome. If you take out the variables and assume nothing, you're left with scientific fact. If it works, it works; if it doesn't, it's bunk.
Depends on what the product is used for. When it comes to supplements, if more than a certain number of people verify its efficacy, I'll give it a try based on that but won't expect sh*t till i have results. Otherwise, I research facts and find something that matches those facts.
A plethora of people have sworn that CEE, arginine, and horribly under-dosed products were the best thing ever, despite studies later coming out showing the opposite. Even if you say that you "won't expect sh*t," that's not how it works; simply by being aware that "a certain number of people [have verified] its efficacy," that statement of not expecting anything goes out the window, weather you think it does or not.Depends on what the product is used for. When it comes to supplements, if more than a certain number of people verify its efficacy, I'll give it a try based on that but won't expect sh*t till i have results. Otherwise, I research facts and find something that matches those facts.
A plethora of people have sworn that CEE, arginine, and horribly under-dosed products were the best thing ever, despite studies later coming out showing the opposite. Even if you say that you "won't expect sh*t," that's not how it works; simply by being aware that "a certain number of people [have verified] its efficacy," that statement of not expecting anything goes out the window, weather you think it does or not.
Fine, but, by researching a supplement (knowing what it is, what it's supposed to do, and what people noticed from it), something that you claim to do before you decide to try it, how are you not subject to the placebo effect? Additionally, it seems that you do research to determine if you want to try a supplement (a smart thing to do, obviously), and I assume that there are some supplements you decide to try, and others you do not. If, after doing enough research on supplement A (studies show that it is an effective stimulant, and many people report feeling very energized after taking it), you decide to purchase it and give it a try, are you not, at least on some level, expecting it to provide you with energy? Are you not going to be consciously looking for changes in energy after taking the supplement? How are you going to decide how and when to take the supplement if you're not expecting anything at all?Let's agree to disagree.
I thought you'd say that. If you are aware that it is a stimulant, and you know what you should expect from a stimulant, to a degree at least, and you are consciously evaluating the products effectiveness in regards to certain parameters that you expect it to effect, I fail to see how you are not susceptible to the placebo effect; taking a stimulant before bed or a sedative before a workout doesn't change that.If it's supposed to be a stimulant, then to validate its efficacy, I'll take it at 1800 and see if i can go to sleep later lol
I thought you'd say that. If you are aware that it is a stimulant, and you know what you should expect from a stimulant, to a degree at least, and you are consciously evaluating the products effectiveness in regards to certain parameters that you expect it to effect, I fail to see how you are not susceptible to the placebo effect; taking a stimulant before bed or a sedative before a workout doesn't change that.
I suppose you could get a better idea by having another person give you either the supplement you are evaluating or a placebo without telling you which is which, and then take the other one another time (and maybe repeat this a few times), taking notes and making observations each time, and then compare your notes and observations after you've taken both the supplement and the placebo. Even then, it's still technically impossible to eliminate ALL other variables, but it'll still help eliminate the placebo effect that you are NOT immune to.