That was a good arcticle, unfortunately it only made Page 2, which usually isn't taken seriously.LCSULLA said:Different point of few
Invalid Link Removed
Mass_69 said:That was a good arcticle, unfortunately it only made Page 2, which usually isn't taken seriously.
I'd like to see an arcticle with a subjective point of view like that make the regular ESPN section.
:study:Who has done more psychological damage to the youth of America? A few buffed-up sluggers? Or scores of waifish supermodels, driving teenage girls to anorexia and their mothers to the nearest plastic surgeon?
:toofunny:Besides, even if a kid takes steroids because he idolizes Bonds, that doesn't mean Bonds should have to refrain. The man can smoke. He can patronize a strip club. He can vote, pay taxes, see an R-rated movie.
"There are things that are appropriate for adults that aren't appropriate for children," Sullum said. "I guess athletes shouldn't be driving cars, either."
Beowulf said:This guy actually sounds a bit like John Romano from MD. I don't watch sports, but he claims baseball was pretty lame once the scrutiny intensified. If so, this may be a first stride by ESPN to try to reinvigorate a fading game. The media may tremble the notion of a danger to our youth, but they are petrified at the thought of declining profits.
Grunt76 said:Yeh... Nice! The pendulum is swinging back, I guess...