Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Epi-MAX

LeanBulk

LeanBulk

Member
Does anyone know about the company or anything about Epi-MAX? It appears to be very close to epistane/havoc, but a little different.

Epi-Max: 2a,3a Epithio-17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-5a-androstane

Epistane/Havoc: 2a,3a-epithio-17a-methyl-5a-androstan-17b-ol

Anyways, anyone have any experience with this product??
 
well the label says its the same thing, thats just 2 ways of writing the same compound i belive.... who knows how legit it is though, why dont you try it out and let us know???
 
tom0788 said:
How's this look?
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...


The ions found are similar to other products for this compound; however the retention time does not match, which suggests a different compound or isomer than the others.


The COA itself says this doesn't match up with either Havoc or Epistane.
 
wow another variation yet again??? and this one is the only one to have a relatively high mg per cap when compared to test still.... very odd but not necessarily bad.
 
poopypants said:
wow another variation yet again??? and this one is the only one to have a relatively high mg per cap when compared to test still.... very odd but not necessarily bad.
Click to expand...

Is there a reason why it's listed as "Results mg/cap", as opposed to how the test results for the other products lists only "Amount Tested, Est."?
 
hmm i didnt notice.. although i did notice the lab listed it as 99% pure to the compound name... now hoe did they do that when we all know they dont have a standard? :think:
 
hmm ok, im just still wonering how they can say 99%? we KNOW that company owns no standard. or does that 99% mean something diff? ill be honest im not super literate when reading those things.
 
poopypants said:
hmm ok, im just still wonering how they can say 99%? we KNOW that company owns no standard. or does that 99% mean something diff? ill be honest im not super literate when reading those things.
Click to expand...

basically what they are saying is that the substance they made was 99% of whatever they synthesized and 1% something else. the 1% is jsut standard error.

now what they synthesized is yet to be said.
 
PumpingIron said:
basically what they are saying is that the substance they made was 99% of whatever they synthesized and 1% something else. the 1% is jsut standard error.

now what they synthesized is yet to be said.
Click to expand...

AHA i understand, kinda, i just figured that by placing it right next to the chem compound name that they were saying it was 99% that compound.... aha well thats why those things can truely be misleading unless you are a profesional. although many claim to be on here and im pretty sure they are just talkin out their arses as well...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top