EMI - what happened to sarms?

[Tank999]

Excuse my ignorance - but what happened to all the reputable companies that were making or selling sarms? It's almost like it became a dirty word! And the funny thing is all the (remaining) PHs are still going strong!
Did I miss something?

 

[Alpha1a]

They're banned brother I'm pretty sure a couple companies got sued over making them

 

[Tank999]

They're banned brother I'm pretty sure a couple companies got sued over making them

Wow! And I'm just getting to like them... Thanks for the info

 

[BlockBuilder]

Iron mag labs got sued and they WON! Athletix lost the case

 

[AllTheGainz]

SARMs got banned? When? How?

How do you even ban a research chemical that's not sold for human use?

 

[unreal89]

Thats like saying how did they ban k2 or bath salts they put a ban out on stuff that works then reformulate a new chemical structure to get it to sell legaly there will always be new stuff coming out and old stuff that works getting banned

 

[Jebrook]

SARMs are not banned. It is simply illegal for them to be marketed and sold as health supplements.

 

[Alpha1a]

SARMs are not banned. It is simply illegal for them to be marketed and sold as health supplements.

Oh shoot my bad

 

[Alpha1a]

^^ to complete that
I said banned because it's what I've read before but must have been wrong

 

[Dma378]

SARMs got banned? When? How?

How do you even ban a research chemical that's not sold for human use?

This is the most misused term/context for a SARM. SARMs are not research chemicals. The only thing that makes something a research chemical is when it's made by a RESEARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY.

Take Exemestane for example. It is a medicine. A real pharmaceutical product. But when "xxxproducts" makes it, they label it as a "Research Chemical" in order to exploit a loophole, claiming "not for human consumption".

SARMs are also pharmaceutical medicines, hormones, etc. So they can be banned under that context. Now company XXX can produce them and say "not for human consumption" "for research purposes only" and it gets the tag research chemical.

 

[Toren]

If you're interested in reading more about the Invalid Link Removed

 

[AllTheGainz]

This is the most misused term/context for a SARM. SARMs are not research chemicals. The only thing that makes something a research chemical is when it's made by a RESEARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY.

Take Exemestane for example. It is a medicine. A real pharmaceutical product. But when "xxxproducts" makes it, they label it as a "Research Chemical" in order to exploit a loophole, claiming "not for human consumption".

SARMs are also pharmaceutical medicines, hormones, etc. So they can be banned under that context. Now company XXX can produce them and say "not for human consumption" "for research purposes only" and it gets the tag research chemical.

My bad, I do know the difference between the two. It just happened to slip my mind