Donald Trump running for president

ax1 said:
A lot of Asians also oppose the BLM movement since their policies directly oppress Asians here in America.
Click to expand...
i agree with your wife 100%...but i was refering to your saying get a job:cool:

i am on permanent vacation---at least as far as the government is concerned:p
 
ax1 said:
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
our military is off defending our country overseas.....when we are being invaded, i'm sorry but this makes zero sense to me.

democrats can call it what they want, but to me it's a invasion....i think of this country as my home!!!
 
BamBam54 said:
Sidney Powell in the news... arguing that no reasonable person would take her Dominion statements as fact???

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
The reasonable people didn't believe her lies
 
ax1 said:
I gotta admit, she does come off as a creepy bastard every time I see her, lol
Click to expand...
She's using the Tucker defence by passing blame back to listeners rather than taking responsibility. Tucker got off his lawsuit by claiming the same thing, it is ridiculous that people like them can knowingly lie then just say "lol no reasonable person would take it as fact" when faced with a lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
Ricky10 said:
Certainly doesn’t say much to justify the rescinding of the Muslim travel ban by the O’Biden administration. Just further solidifies yet another avenue in which they are failing to preserve our country.
Click to expand...
Do you realise the suspect lived most of his life in the US or nah?

Like how would the travel ban have prevented this?
 
Jiigzz said:
Do you realise the suspect lived most of his life in the US or nah?

Like how would the travel ban have prevented this?
Click to expand...

What I know is 10 white people died yesterday and my species are oppressed and going extinct. When is government going to give me a free iPad and pay my mortgage?
 
ax1 said:
What I know is 10 white people died yesterday and my species are oppressed and going extinct. When is government going to give me a free iPad and pay my mortgage?
Click to expand...
So how does the travel ban solve that problem if the person lived in the US most of their life?
 
Jiigzz said:
So how does the travel ban solve that problem if the person lived in the US most of their life?
Click to expand...

Oh I was just getting zoned into my usual ranting stupor and not addressing the issue you put forth.
 
dixonk said:
If it could save just one life right??? I’m cool with a muslim ban.
Click to expand...
500,000 + people are dead because you don't want to wear a mask. So why do you draw the line at Muslim ban?

Just sounds a touch islamophobic unless you can help me make sense of it? Where is this "if it could save 1 life" type stuff with wearing masks?

I'd imagine you'd save more lives by not bombing the crap out of other countries as well
 
Jiigzz said:
500,000 + people are dead because you don't want to wear a mask. So why do you draw the line at Muslim ban?

Just sounds a touch islamophobic unless you can help me make sense of it? Where is this "if it could save 1 life" type stuff with wearing masks?

I'd imagine you'd save more lives by not bombing the crap out of other countries as well
Click to expand...
it's all bidens fault...
 
Jiigzz said:
500,000 + people are dead because you don't want to wear a mask.
Click to expand...

I would appreciate seeing a statistically, not emotionally, based argument irrefutably supporting this allegation.

If anyone has a legitimate study that conclusively determines that 500,000 people have died, solely and exclusively, as a result of failure of some subset of society to wear a mask, I would be very interested in reading it.

Absent an A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between a third party's death and a third party non dying, I believe it is merely conjecture (with motives unassigned) for this conclusion to have been reached.

Absent that, if anyone has a A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between others becoming COVID infected or not becoming COVID infected, that would also be fascinating reading.

I am very open to being proven wrong. After all, it would be irresponsible if one we to fail to follow the science.
 
Last edited:
Beau said:
I would appreciate seeing a statistically, not emotionally, based argument irrefutably supporting this allegation.

If anyone has a legitimate study that conclusively determines that 500,000 people have died, solely and exclusively, as a result of failure of some subset of society to wear a mask, I would be very interested in reading it.

Absent an A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between a third party's death and a third party non dying, I believe it is merely conjecture (with motives unassigned) for this conclusion to have been reached.

Absent that, if anyone has a A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between others becoming COVID infected or not becoming COVID infected, that would also be fascinating reading.

I am very open to being proven wring. After all, it would be irresponsible if one we to fail to follow the science.
Click to expand...

I really wonder how many people got sick because of the masks. Either from touching them improperly with infected hands or having a false sense of security because the fact is most of these masks have most of the air coming out the sides and the top of the nose.
 
Beau said:
I would appreciate seeing a statistically, not emotionally, based argument irrefutably supporting this allegation.

If anyone has a legitimate study that conclusively determines that 500,000 people have died, solely and exclusively, as a result of failure of some subset of society to wear a mask, I would be very interested in reading it.

Absent an A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between a third party's death and a third party non dying, I believe it is merely conjecture (with motives unassigned) for this conclusion to have been reached.

Absent that, if anyone has a A-B double-blind study with a control group, the only variable being the extent to which one group wore a mask ands the other did not, and that the failure to wear masks was a proven casual relationship between others becoming COVID infected or not becoming COVID infected, that would also be fascinating reading.

I am very open to being proven wring. After all, it would be irresponsible if one we to fail to follow the science.
Click to expand...
You missed the point.

Dixon has openly stated he is against wearing a mask, yet if it could save even 1 life, as he put it, it should be worth doing. So why does his logic only apply to a Muslim ban? After all, its about saving even just 1 life is it not?

Suddenly its not really about saving lives at all
 
Last edited:
Yet here we are a year later... masks or not, virus still killing. Even in countries without Trump, places with full blown lockdowns and masks (Italy, France, Belgium, etc). Virus keeps spreading and killing.

Open states like Florida compared to closed states like California, no real difference. But those masks, yo.

Single, double, or triple masks? How many you pushing before it makes a measurable difference somewhere??
 
Jiigzz said:
You missed the point.

Dixon has openly stated he is against wearing a mask, yet if it could save even 1 life, as he put it, it should be worth doing. So why does his logic only apply to a Muslim ban? After all, its about saving even just 1 life is it not?

Suddenly its not really about saving lives at all
Click to expand...

Obviously that went over your head. Here in the states when politicians argue for gun control they always use the argument, if it could save just one life. It’s me playing on the words of stupid democrats to make my wishes come true. Hey if they can use it so can I right?

As far as the mask, if you think not wearing a mask is the cause of 500k people dying I have oceanfront property in Nebraska to sell you.
 
this year marks the 20th anniversary of 911...i will never forget when even cnn showed the reaction of muslims all over the world--it was like their team had just won the world series.
 
Groper Joe....America's new current #1 gun salesman!

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Basically everything that the emotional side is preaching is blatantly wrong when you look a bit further. This is the founder of Green peace saying that climate change is all BS:


Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
Do you realise the suspect lived most of his life in the US or nah?

Like how would the travel ban have prevented this?
Click to expand...

I didn’t know that, but I assumed as much.

It’s all about limiting damage from pests in the future. Nothing wrong with being proactive.
 
THOR 70 said:
Basically everything that the emotional side is preaching is blatantly wrong when you look a bit further. This is the founder of Green peace saying that climate change is all BS:


Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
Sounds much like Trump’s perspective, and anyone else that doesn’t use climate change as a tool of manipulation.
 
Coming to a country near you:

Invalid Link Removed


The comments section is telling. If you’re against this experimental gene therapy, you are not alone!
 
THOR 70 said:
Basically everything that the emotional side is preaching is blatantly wrong when you look a bit further. This is the founder of Green peace saying that climate change is all BS:


Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
I can't watch it, but if this is Moore again he isn't the founder of Greenpeace and hasn't been involved with them since the 1980s.

The dude is a board member of an energy company, of course he is against any motion of climate change.
 
THOR 70 said:
Basically everything that the emotional side is preaching is blatantly wrong when you look a bit further. This is the founder of Green peace saying that climate change is all BS:

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

The fact you gobble their information up like sheep just shows how mindless you are. Sheep to the oil tycoons because they claim to know the real troof

images.jpeg-49.jpeg
 
Jiigzz said:
I can't watch it, but if this is Moore again he isn't the founder of Greenpeace and hasn't been involved with them since the 1980s.

The dude is a board member of an energy company, of course he is against any motion of climate change.
Click to expand...

Co founder then? I don’t really care, I just don’t buy it because of the agenda behind it. Tax tax tax.

Look we should alway be looking to become more efficient, but like the corona virus, climate change is being leveraged for control and power. It’s pathetic and I see right through it. They have plenty of emotional puppets bleeding for their cause though...
 
THOR 70 said:
Co founder then? I don’t really care, I just don’t buy it because of the agenda behind it. Tax tax tax.

Look we should alway be looking to become more efficient, but like the corona virus, climate change is being leveraged for control and power. It’s pathetic and I see right through it. They have plenty of emotional puppets bleeding for their cause though...
Click to expand...

All taxes, corrupt big billion dollar “green” deals between sleazy politicians and money hungry corporations, no real substantial solutions to problems that are speculative at best.
 
Ricky10 said:
I didn’t know that, but I assumed as much.

It’s all about limiting damage from pests in the future. Nothing wrong with being proactive.
Click to expand...
It is islamophobic to simply ban someone because they are Muslim or come from a Muslim predominant country.

You all would have an outrage over persecution if countries stopped allowing you access because you were Christian or from a Christian predominant nation.

"Pest" is a very strong term here. Remember, the US are considered terrorists in other countries overseas. People might be less mad if you stopped bombing their citizens for oil.
 
THOR 70 said:
Co founder then? I don’t really care, I just don’t buy it because of the agenda behind it. Tax tax tax.

Look we should alway be looking to become more efficient, but like the corona virus, climate change is being leveraged for control and power. It’s pathetic and I see right through it. They have plenty of emotional puppets bleeding for their cause though...
Click to expand...
You realise wars are literally fought over oil right? The US has invaded the middle east for control of their resources
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top