Donald Trump running for president

[HIT4ME]

Nothing to add, except this thread is so hard to keep up with. 1 day without checking it and I'm pages behind lol.

I hear that! I have just given up if I fall a couple days behind - sometimes there are great conversations that I just miss and want to bring up but...it moves too fast and I am long winded enough!

 

[Carnivorecon]

Are we serious? But we’re not allowed to know if a coworker has AIDS/HIV?!?

Also, my coworker ate my food and put it back. Now I can’t eat from it and have to leave it in there long enough for her to think that I didn’t throw it out because I saw her eat it!!!!

Invalid Link Removed

What?!:F@ck tip toeing round that sh!t, you should ask her to explain why the hell she's sticking her dirty ass gums on your food and sticking it back to pass her germs on the sly

 

[Jiigzz]

Invalid Link Removed

If he said that, there is a logic behind it. In 3rd world countries there is a high child mortality rate. Parents tend to have many children to increase the odds of 1 or 2 surviving beyond childhood.

What Gates is likely saying is that by decreasing mortality, the people will birth less children because they don't need to have 'back ups' in case of death.

 

[ax1]

WHO: England’s new Covid-19 variant picked up in Denmark, the Netherlands, Australia

(CiaNN) Asked whether it was her understanding that the new variant originated or evolved from southeastern England, she said: “It is, yes. From the information that [the UK] shared with us in either south-east England or in London, yes.”

She added that “the UK had picked [the existence of the new variant] up in September and seen that this had been circulating in south-east England since September.”

“It is of concern that the virus is spreading and that it has so many mutations,” she said.

She also added: “We understand that the virus does not cause more severe disease from the preliminary information that [the UK] shared with us, although again those studies are underway to look at hospitalized patients with this variant.”

Van Kerkhove said that doing more sequencing will be helpful in determining whether this variant is circulating elsewhere.

“The longer this virus spreads, the more opportunities it has to change. So we really need to do everything we can right now to prevent spread,” she added.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

If he said that, there is a logic behind it. In 3rd world countries there is a high child mortality rate. Parents tend to have many children to increase the odds of 1 or 2 surviving beyond childhood.

What Gates is likely saying is that by decreasing mortality, the people will birth less children.

2nd, 3rd world countries tend to have more children in order to support the family, with a lowered child mortality rate we will have a increase in global population. The way to slow population growth is through modernization and strong economies. Working families have the voluntary incentives to have less kids.

The authoritarian way of course is forced sterilization, forced abortions, infanticide, just like John P. Holdren, Obobo's former senior science advisor as outlined in his book Ecoscience.

Decreasing child mortality rate in 3rd world countries will absolutely increase population growth. Not that it matters, people arent the problem, we can have stuff all 6 billion people in the world and stuff them in Texas and they will be fine. Dont buy the propagandist bullshyt, and Bill Gates is a low life Bilderberger terrorist thug.

 

[Jiigzz]

I looked it up, and sure enough:
In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.
“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

 

[ax1]

I looked it up, and sure enough:
In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.
“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

Source? And I wonder over what period of time this is and you have to account for other variables such as economies, etc...

 

[Jiigzz]

2nd, 3rd world countries tend to have more children in order to support the family, with a lowered child mortality rate we will have a increase in global population. The way to slow population growth is through modernization and strong economies. Working families have the voluntary incentives to have less kids.

The authoritarian way of course is forced sterilization, forced abortions, infanticide, just like John P. Holdren, Obobo's former senior science advisor as outlined in his book Ecoscience.

Decreasing child mortality rate in 3rd world countries will absolutely increase population growth. Not that it matters, people arent the problem, we can have stuff all 6 billion people in the world and stuff them in Texas and they will be fine. Dont buy the propagandist bullshyt, and Bill Gates is a low life Bilderberger terrorist thug.

It's less about land space, but more about resources.

 

[ax1]

It's less about land space, but more about resources.

There is a strong overabundance of resources, I dont buy the big banker globalist (who brainwash liberal minions) bullcrap.

People throw out enough food to feed the entire planet every day. The problem is something else, its not due to lack of resources, not at all, no way in hell, impossible.

 

[ax1]

It's less about land space, but more about resources.

Look at it like this, if 65% of the overweight shytfuqs in my country just stopped eating so much crap and we distributed that alone around the world, starvation in the globe would be over.

 

[Jiigzz]

There is a strong overabundance of resources, I dont buy the big banker globalist (who brainwash liberal minions) bullcrap.

People throw out enough food to feed the entire planet every day. The problem is something else, its not due to lack of resources, not at all, no way in hell, impossible.

Humans are incredibly wasteful and not very resourceful, so I absolutely agree.

One of Aucklands drinking water sources loses a ton of water every day due to leakage along the system. They're in a water restriction now, but if they had better infrastructure it would work so much better

 

[ax1]

I looked it up, and sure enough:
In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.
“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

Or maybe his stats are accurate because he talks to Obobo's former science advisor John P. Holdren's where in his book ecoscience the proper way to global population control is to secretly sterilize the public by putting drugs in the public water supply.

 

[ax1]

Humans are incredibly wasteful and not very resourceful, so I absolutely agree.

One of Aucklands drinking water sources loses a ton of water every day due to leakage along the system. They're in a water restriction now, but if they had better infrastructure it would work so much better

Thats part of what I am talking about, we have enough technology to make sure this never happens. There is always alot of greed and corruption behind the scenes in the way.

Did you ever hear how the Bush family stole some South American land (was it Bolivia?) that controlled the regions water supply and they took it so they can tax the locals on their own water?

This world is so not right.

 

[thebigt]

It is 100% OK to question it. Absolutely.

Just make sure the criticisms are actually based on evidence (or a lack thereof). Also recognize that vaccines and viruses are exceptionally complex, so listening to the right information is also important.

For example, criticizing a vaccine because Bill Gates wants to microchip the entire planet is a bit far fetched. Being a bit concerned about an allergic reaction is more valid.

what if my criticism isn't based on facts or science just on my gut feeling that is has been rushed and i don't feel comfortable about it till i see how people react to it---remember outside of test group no one has had 2nd injection as far as i know.

what i do know is that many people i know including guys on this forum have had the virus and recovered. to me at this time i would rather take my chances on recovering from virus than the unkown consequences of getting vaccine....i hope it doesn't come down to my being pressured[forced] to take this vaccine.

 

[thebigt]

Are we serious? But we’re not allowed to know if a coworker has AIDS/HIV?!?

Also, my coworker ate my food and put it back. Now I can’t eat from it and have to leave it in there long enough for her to think that I didn’t throw it out because I saw her eat it!!!!

Invalid Link Removed

the way i see it there will be immense pressure put on people to get the vaccine...i am not liking the direction this is taking to be honest!!!

 

[ax1]

the way i see it there will be immense pressure put on people to get the vaccine...i am not liking the direction this is taking to be honest!!!

As I said, in NY someone already introduced a bill to make it a crime to say no to the vax if not 70% voluntarily go get it.

 

[ax1]

As I said, in NY someone already introduced a bill to make it a crime to say no to the vax if not 70% voluntarily go get it.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Or maybe his stats are accurate because he talks to Obobo's former science advisor John P. Holdren's where in his book ecoscience the proper way to global population control is to secretly sterilize the public by putting drugs in the public water supply.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Obama's own appointed Science Czar wrote a book called "Ecoscience, Population, Resources, Management" promoting mass vaccinations for sterilization, putting chemicals in the public water supply, forced abortions, infanticide, etc....

I personally have this book, I wonder if Groper Joe will give him his job back???

quote:
In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man was firmly in control of science
policy in the United States under POTUS Obobo, topics include:

+ Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or
not;

+ The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally
put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

+ Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them
against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

+ People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be
required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words,
be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

+ A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy
and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed
international police force.

 

[ax1]

You guys, gals, and especially gender neutrals need to know how sick some of the people in government are.

Clips direct from Ecoscience

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

 

[thebigt]

Invalid Link Removed

if they get away with making it a law to get covid vaccine what will be next?

 

[Jiigzz]

what if my criticism isn't based on facts or science just on my gut feeling that is has been rushed and i don't feel comfortable about it till i see how people react to it---remember outside of test group no one has had 2nd injection as far as i know.

what i do know is that many people i know including guys on this forum have had the virus and recovered. to me at this time i would rather take my chances on recovering from virus than the unkown consequences of getting vaccine....i hope it doesn't come down to my being pressured[forced] to take this vaccine.

Gotcha.

I understand. The way I see it is that vaccines are not really for the groups who are not vulnerable. However, those people can still spread the disease to the vulnerable. It's less about how it will help you, and more about how you can potentially help others.

Typically the most common side effects to vaccines are some pain, swelling, allergic reaction or other things like that. Those side effects are relatively easily managed and Docs are well prepared for them.

You might get a slight fever, or aches and chills, but those are typical responses by your body when it encounters a foreign object. The vaccine itself won't give you Covid.

With Covid it's more of a gamble. You might barely notice it, or you might end up on a ventilator. Lots of factors come into play when it comes to a viral infection. Viral load, your own immune system and a bunch of other variables outside your control.

Sweden did try the herd immunity approach and it backfired majorly for them. I was interested to follow it (allow healthy people out, monitor and restrict the older, vulnerable populations) and was disappointed when I heard it didnt go to plan.

 

[thebigt]

Gotcha.

I understand. The way I see it is that vaccines are not really for the groups who are not vulnerable. However, those people can still spread the disease to the vulnerable. It's less about how it will help you, and more about how you can potentially help others.

Typically the most common side effects to vaccines are some pain, swelling, allergic reaction or other things like that. Those side effects are relatively easily managed and Docs are well prepared for them.

You might get a slight fever, or aches and chills, but those are typical responses by your body when it encounters a foreign object. The vaccine itself won't give you Covid.

With Covid it's more of a gamble. You might barely notice it, or you might end up on a ventilator. Lots of factors come into play when it comes to a viral infection. Viral load, your own immune system and a bunch of other variables outside your control.

Sweden did try the herd immunity approach and it backfired majorly for them. I was interested to follow it (allow healthy people out, monitor and restrict the older, vulnerable populations) and was disappointed when I heard it didnt go to plan.

on average around 4,500 drugs are recalled each year. the recalled products have FDA approval and in many cases are widely ingested, injected or implanted before being recalled....

to get FDA approval means they have been deemed safe and effective after going thru clinical trials.

 

[GreenMachineX]

Gotcha.

I understand. The way I see it is that vaccines are not really for the groups who are not vulnerable. However, those people can still spread the disease to the vulnerable. It's less about how it will help you, and more about how you can potentially help others.

Typically the most common side effects to vaccines are some pain, swelling, allergic reaction or other things like that. Those side effects are relatively easily managed and Docs are well prepared for them.

You might get a slight fever, or aches and chills, but those are typical responses by your body when it encounters a foreign object. The vaccine itself won't give you Covid.

With Covid it's more of a gamble. You might barely notice it, or you might end up on a ventilator. Lots of factors come into play when it comes to a viral infection. Viral load, your own immune system and a bunch of other variables outside your control.

Sweden did try the herd immunity approach and it backfired majorly for them. I was interested to follow it (allow healthy people out, monitor and restrict the older, vulnerable populations) and was disappointed when I heard it didnt go to plan.

My issue with the vaccine is we don't know long term what it will do. We also don't know what covid will do either, but if herd immunity didnt work in Sweden, why would a vaccine work? Isn't a vaccine basically artificial herd immunity?

Edit: For clarity, you keep bringing up short term sides but I don't think any of us care about those.

 

[ax1]

I understand. The way I see it is that vaccines are not really for the groups who are not vulnerable. However, those people can still spread the disease to the vulnerable. It's less about how it will help you, and more about how you can potentially help others.

So if you just vaccinate the vulnerable, then they arent vulnerable any more. Problem solved.

Doesnt that make sense? You wouldnt be helping anybody because they are already immune.

 

[Jiigzz]

on average around 4,500 drugs are recalled each year. the recalled products have FDA approval and in many cases are widely ingested, injected or implanted before being recalled....

to get FDA approval means they have been deemed safe and effective after going thru clinical trials.

FDA approval doesnt mean the product is safe. Which sounds strange, but yeah.

I would believe most would be due to manufacturing issues (I.e. spiked or tainted) as opposed to being recalled due to the inherent nature of the drug

 

[ax1]

My issue with the vaccine is we don't know long term what it will do. We also don't know what covid will do either, but if herd immunity didnt work in Sweden, why would a vaccine work? Isn't a vaccine basically artificial herd immunity?

Natural herd immunity would take far longer time I think.

 

[ax1]

Sweden did try the herd immunity approach and it backfired majorly for them. I was interested to follow it (allow healthy people out, monitor and restrict the older, vulnerable populations) and was disappointed when I heard it didnt go to plan.

They lost 8k out of a population of 10 million and their economy is performing better than expected as their recent results show.

So lets do the math, 0.08% of the population perished and they should have shut down the economy and people's livelihoods instead?

 

[ax1]

Invalid Link Removed

 

[Jiigzz]

My issue with the vaccine is we don't know long term what it will do. We also don't know what covid will do either, but if herd immunity didnt work in Sweden, why would a vaccine work? Isn't a vaccine basically artificial herd immunity?

Edit: For clarity, you keep bringing up short term sides but I don't think any of us care about those.

It's not that herd immunity didn't work, it is more that on the way to trying to reach it their hospitals were becoming very quickly overwhelmed

 

[Jiigzz]

So if you just vaccinate the vulnerable, then they arent vulnerable any more. Problem solved.

Doesnt that make sense? You wouldnt be helping anybody because they are already immune.

Some people genuinely cannot get immunized. So there are always large pockets of the population that rely on herd immunity

 

[GreenMachineX]

It's not that herd immunity didn't work, it is more that on the way to trying to reach it their hospitals were becoming very quickly overwhelmed

Gotcha.

 

[Jiigzz]

They lost 8k out of a population of 10 million and their economy is performing better than expected as their recent results show.

So lets do the math, 0.08% of the population perished and they should have shut down the economy and people's livelihoods instead?

Read about how angry their people are. The King has called it a failure.

I'm not saying what approach is better, only that the Swedes arent impressed

 

[Ricky10]

“The longer this virus spreads, the more opportunities it has to change. So we really need to do everything we can right now to prevent spread,” she added.

This is what I keep seeing repeatedly. Not based on propaganda by the government to flap its wings, but virology. The vaccine(s) is our chance to gain the upper hand, but we can’t delay for as long as some people may want to. We have been searching for a cure that isn’t worse than the disease, and this is our best chance of having that. People have to be willing to utilize it and invest a bit of faith so we can have a chance at moving beyond this. We can’t keep up this reactive state of living we have been confined to. This is our chance to be proactive!

 

[ax1]

Some people genuinely cannot get immunized. So there are always large pockets of the population that rely on herd immunity

I didnt think of that, had no idea how far extensively people cant get shots. Thats certainly an important part of the picture here.

 

[ax1]

Read about how angry their people are. The King has called it a failure.

I'm not saying what approach is better, only that the Swedes arent impressed

Ill try to look into it. I mean my brothinking says, if that many people were that upset, why not voluntarily shut down and quarantine themselves? Maybe its just a mixed bag and the media is pushing one side of the story over another, thats another guess on my part without doing research yet. If it was really that many people, nobody is stopping them from closing up shop and staying home, isnt that common sense?

 

[Jiigzz]

Ill try to look into it. I mean by brothinking says, if that many people were that upset, why not voluntarily shut down and quarantine themselves? Maybe its just a mixed bag and the media is pushing one side of the story over another, thats another guess on my part without doing research yet. If it was really that many people, nobody is stopping them from closing up shop and staying home, isnt that common sense?

It all boils down to healthcare resources and it's limitations. Unfortunately, there are more than a few people who think it wont impact them, and then end up in the ICU.

That's what Sweden was trying to do. Leaving the healthy population to stay as normal but quarantine the more vulnerable. But maybe some people are just not good judges on whether they are vulnerable or not.

It's tricky because for some people they'll barely notice it, but for others it could kill them. In between somewhere are those who will have long term complications. It's tough to balance everyone's situation

 

[ax1]

This is what I keep seeing repeatedly. Not based on propaganda by the government to flap its wings, but virology. The vaccine(s) is our chance to gain the upper hand, but we can’t delay for as long as some people may want to. We have been searching for a cure that isn’t worse than the disease, and this is our best chance of having that. People have to be willing to utilize it and invest a bit of faith so we can have a chance at moving beyond this. We can’t keep up this reactive state of living we have been confined to. This is our chance to be proactive!

Cumho is calling this the biggest undertaking since WWII. He points out we have had to date 180 million tests done. We need 330 million vax twice, so 660 million shots. He also acknowledges he needs to up the propaghanda (not in those words, lol) and educate people on taking the vax as skepticism is a big problem.

He also keeps lying telling people its not going to cost NYers a single penny, thats a big fat lie. This is going to certainly be a monstrous cost and we are all paying for it.

 

[ax1]

Just so you all know, here in NY King Cumho set up an independent panel to investigate the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Nothing goes into NY'ers without the extra layer of watchful eyes first.

Im not saying I have faith in my NY government, but I do think its good if every state followed suit for consumer protections in between the Fed.

Actually, not sure when you remember Dump saying he isnt going to ship the Vax to NY a while back when Cumho first implemented that, but really there is nothing wrong with having that layer of protection.

 

[thebigt]

FDA approval doesnt mean the product is safe. Which sounds strange, but yeah.

I would believe most would be due to manufacturing issues (I.e. spiked or tainted) as opposed to being recalled due to the inherent nature of the drug

you should look up description of recall as pertaining to a drug being recalled. at 4,500 separate drugs being recalled each year even if only 10% of recalls are class 1 recalls that is still quite high.

 

[Jiigzz]

you should look up description of recall as pertaining to a drug being recalled. at 4,500 separate drugs being recalled each year even if only 10% of recalls are class 1 recalls that is still quite high.

Yeah it definitely is. I'm making an assumption that because the entire earth is watching the vaccine roll out, they will be taking more precautions than normal.

Could be naive, but that's my general feelings on it.

I had a tetanus injection yesterday!

 

[Ricky10]

Cumho is calling this the biggest undertaking since WWII. He points out we have had to date 180 million tests done. We need 330 million vax twice, so 660 million shots. He also acknowledges he needs to up the propaghanda (not in those words, lol) and educate people on taking the vax as skepticism is a big problem.

He also keeps lying telling people its not going to cost NYers a single penny, thats a big fat lie. This is going to certainly be a monstrous cost and we are all paying for it.

It certainly is an endeavor, especially in highly populated areas. Ultimately it will be available though to all who want it so distribution should be the least of people’s concern. In terms of cost, the prices are <$40 with Pfizer being at that upper end. Ultimately I don’t think it will be a financial issue worth being concerned about no matter how we look at it. Particularly in light of what the China virus has cost us. That being said, Cumho is a problem in himself, so I don’t know what to make of that...haha!

 

[thebigt]

Yeah it definitely is. I'm making an assumption that because the entire earth is watching the vaccine roll out, they will be taking more precautions than normal.

Could be naive, but that's my general feelings on it.

I had a tetanus injection yesterday!

like i said before i am far from a anti-vaxxer. i get a flu shot every year and a pneumonia shot every 7. last month i got the 1st of 2 shingles shot.

lol...had many tetanus shot over my lifetime, even though arm is really sore for a few days!!!!

it's just my gut telling me that something isn't right with this covid vaccine-i've got a bad feeling about it.

 

[Ricky10]

OK...so I’m just going to say this:

My GF is in her mid 40’s, is slightly overweight and has psoriatic arthritis. Her parents are ~70, higher risk- overweight, borderline diabetes but otherwise healthy. My father is ~70 and couldn’t be healthier. My brother is in his 40’s and is very healthy/active as well.

If I were to hear news tomorrow from any of them that they either tested positive for the China virus, or got their first dose of (let’s say Pfizer) vaccine. I would 100% prefer hearing that any of them got their first vaccination.

While I tend to think they would all fair well (some better than others) battling a China virus illness, you never know and can’t know. Even after recovery, they could have any number of health issues, and/or suddenly develop a pulmonary embolism or have a stoke due to the issues we have seen with blood clots. Call the vaccine a risk, but you aren’t being infected with anything; rather you are just building your immune defenses. While the vaccine is new territory, we have to weigh that against the risks that we do know. Not to mention the benefits we all reap from taking the upper hand on the virus.

 

[thebigt]

OK...so I’m just going to say this:

My GF is in her mid 40’s, is slightly overweight and has psoriatic arthritis. Her parents are ~70, higher risk- overweight, borderline diabetes but otherwise healthy. My father is ~70 and couldn’t be healthier. My brother is in his 40’s and is very healthy/active as well.

If I were to hear news tomorrow from any of them that they either tested positive for the China virus, or got their first dose of (let’s say Pfizer) vaccine. I would 100% prefer hearing that any of them got their first vaccination.

While I tend to think they would all fair well (some better than others) battling a China virus illness, you never know and can’t know. Even after recovery, they could have any number of health issues, and/or suddenly develop a pulmonary embolism or have a stoke due to the issues we have seen with blood clots. Call the vaccine a risk, but you aren’t being infected with anything; rather you are just building your immune defenses. While the vaccine is new territory, we have to weigh that against the risks that we do know. Not to mention the benefits we all reap from taking the upper hand on the virus.

i get ya, you have made your choice....you gonna make my choice for me too?


or just call me a worthless piece of crap for not jumping in to save humanity?

 

[ax1]

It certainly is an endeavor, especially in highly populated areas. Ultimately it will be available though to all who want it so distribution should be the least of people’s concern. In terms of cost, the prices are <$40 with Pfizer being at that upper end. Ultimately I don’t think it will be a financial issue worth being concerned about no matter how we look at it. Particularly in light of what the China virus has cost us. That being said, Cumho is a problem in himself, so I don’t know what to make of that...haha!

Cumho already is claiming over and over that the "blacks and browns are being neglected with the distribution" via Fed governments plans.

 

[ax1]

like i said before i am far from a anti-vaxxer. i get a flu shot every year and a pneumonia shot every 7. last month i got the 1st of 2 shingles shot.

lol...had many tetanus shot over my lifetime, even though arm is really sore for a few days!!!!

it's just my gut telling me that something isn't right with this covid vaccine-i've got a bad feeling about it.

I was actually curious and looked it up, even with a tetanus shot just under 1 in 100,000 get sever reactions to it. So even if 1 out of 100,000 get severe reactions to the Covid-1984 virus it may appear to be a big loud fear fest, and more so than it should. Im just saying we shouldnt jump to conclusions just because a few stories come out, and I bet they will happen when billions around the world get it.

 

[ax1]

LLLMMMFFFAAAOOO!!!

First they release 6ix9ine because of compassion for Covid-1984, now they release Obobo Bin Laden's public relations expert??
-----------------------------
Osama bin Laden’s public relations expert has been released from an American prison and sent to the United Kingdom, all because he’s old, fat, and locked up during a pandemic.

Adel Abdel Bary, who is now sixty years of age, was imprisoned over the 1998 attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, resulting in the deaths of 224 people.

Held in New Jersey, the Egyptian national walked out of the prison on Tuesday and was flown to London on Wednesday.

Bary’s son, is know for being an ISIS jihadi rapper, and now resides with hs 59-year-old wife at a $1m-plus UK government-subsudized apartment complex.

Bary was arrested in the UK in 1999 and extradited to the States in 2012, where he later pleaded guilty in 2014 to a handful out of 285 offenses.

Granted asylum in the UK in 1991, the United Kingdom will not be deporting Bary to his birth country of Egypt, as he would likely be tortured and killed there.

According to theInvalid Link Removed, the US judge agreed that, due to asthma and obesity, Bary should be released on compassionate grounds amidst the coronavirus pandemic.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[thebigt]

I was actually curious and looked it up, even with a tetanus shot just under 1 in 100,000 get sever reactions to it. So even if 1 out of 100,000 get severe reactions to the Covid-1984 virus it may appear to be a big loud fear fest, and more so than it should. Im just saying we shouldnt jump to conclusions just because a few stories come out, and I bet they will happen when billions around the world get it.

who cares...if they take away my choice to get a covid vaccination what other choices are they going to take away-for the good of all?

 

[ax1]

who cares...if they take away my choice to get a covid vaccination what other choices are they going to take away-for the good of all?

Well, they have been taking alot of choices away from us for a very long time, and it certainly is taking a harder direction the wrong way these days.

 

[Ricky10]

i get ya, you have made your choice....you gonna make my choice for me too?


or just call me a worthless piece of crap for not jumping in to save humanity?

No, I have no intentions to ridicule anyone that does not want to get vaccinated, even though I ultimately hope enough people do receive it to make a significant impact. I understand that your gut is telling you something about the vaccine(s) that doesn’t sit well with you even in light of the pandemic. When it comes down to it, you have to and will do what makes you feel most comfortable.

Cumho already is claiming over and over that the "blacks and browns are being neglected with the distribution" via Fed governments plans.

Well of course they are. Why would this be any different than anything else?!!