Cgkone
Well-known member
Did I say libtards?
Donald Trump running for president
- Thread starter LiftWithDonuts
- Start date
ax1
Legend
I actually think Middletards are worse than libtards, and conservitards. They pretend to be the most normal ones which is far from the case. They are the middle of two extremes which makes them double extreme imo. They are the so called "middle" of two sets "extremes" that are chosen for us for no other reason that telling people how people think so they mold society and contain them in the bottom of a deep well. They say there are 3 levels (including far and fars) of political thought when I say fuq all 3 chains of thought, fuq them ALL, now what?!?!?
Misfit28
Well-known member
You're right, man. Sorry about that. I guess I read other dude's comment lol.
Cgkone
Well-known member
Cgkone
Well-known member
naw it cool , don't be sorry , I say all kinds of stupid sh1t, just not that one .
ax1
Legend
Everybody is some type of tard, except me and you of course but we dont have to tell people that here, they all already know we are untarded.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
If even Stuttering John can get through Trump's security and personnel (including Kushner) and fool him, I think it's more than reasonable to assume trained foreign agents could have as well.
If even Stuttering John can get through Trump's security and personnel (including Kushner) and fool him, I think it's more than reasonable to assume trained foreign agents could have as well.
ax1
Legend
Who’s Afraid of the Trump/Putin Summit?
Written by Ron Paul
Monday July 2, 2018
President Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton was in Moscow last week organizing what promises to be an historic summit meeting between his boss and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bolton, who has for years demanded that the US inflict “pain” on Russia and on Putin specifically, was tasked by Trump to change his tune. He was forced to shed some of his neoconservative skin and get involved in peacemaking. Trump surely deserves some credit for that!
As could be expected given the current political climate in the US, the neoconservatives have joined up with the anti-Trump forces on the Left -- and US client states overseas -- to vigorously oppose any movement toward peace with Russia. The mainstream media is, as also to be expected, amplifying every objection to any step away from a confrontation with Russia.
Bolton had hardly left Moscow when the media began its attacks. US allies are “nervous” over the planned summit, reported Reuters. They did not quote any US ally claiming to be nervous, but they did speculate that both the UK and Ukraine would not be happy were the US and Russia to improve relations. But why is that? The current Ukrainian government is only in power because the Obama Administration launched a coup against its democratically-elected president to put US puppets in charge. They’re right to be nervous. And the British government is also right to be worried. They swore that Russia was behind the “poisoning” of the Skripals without providing any evidence to back up their claims. Hundreds of Russian diplomats were expelled from Western countries on their word alone. And over the past couple of months, each of their claims has fallen short.
At the extreme of the reaction to Bolton’s Russia trip was the US-funded think tank, the Atlantic Council, which is stuck in a 1950s time warp. Its resident Russia “expert,” Anders Åslund, Tweeted that long-time Russia hawk Bolton had been “captured by the Kremlin” and must now be considered a Russian agent for having helped set up a meeting between Trump and Putin. Do they really prefer nuclear war?
The “experts” are usually wrong when it comes to peacemaking. They rely on having “official enemies” for their very livelihood. In 1985, national security “expert” Zbigniew Brzezinski attacked the idea of a summit between President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It was “demeaning” and “tactically unwise,” he said as reported at the time by the Washington Times. Such a meeting would only “elevate” Gorbachev and make him “first among equals,” he said. Thankfully, Reagan did engage Gorbachev in several summits and the rest is history. Brzezinski was wrong and peacemakers were right.
President Trump should understand that any move toward better relations with Russia has been already pre-approved by the American people. His position on Russia was well known. He campaigned very clearly on the idea that the US should end the hostility toward Russia that characterized the Obama Administration and find a way to work together. Voters knew his position and they chose him over Hillary Clinton, who was also very clear on Russia: more confrontation and more aggression.
President Trump would be wise to ignore the neocon talking heads and think tank “experts” paid by defense contractors. He should ignore the “never Trumpers” who have yet to make a coherent policy argument opposing the president. The extent of their opposition to Trump seems to be “he’s mean and rude.” Let us hope that a Trump/Putin meeting begins a move toward real reconciliation and away from the threat of nuclear war.
Copyright © 2018 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Invalid Link Removed
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute
Invalid Link Removed
Written by Ron Paul
Monday July 2, 2018
President Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton was in Moscow last week organizing what promises to be an historic summit meeting between his boss and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bolton, who has for years demanded that the US inflict “pain” on Russia and on Putin specifically, was tasked by Trump to change his tune. He was forced to shed some of his neoconservative skin and get involved in peacemaking. Trump surely deserves some credit for that!
As could be expected given the current political climate in the US, the neoconservatives have joined up with the anti-Trump forces on the Left -- and US client states overseas -- to vigorously oppose any movement toward peace with Russia. The mainstream media is, as also to be expected, amplifying every objection to any step away from a confrontation with Russia.
Bolton had hardly left Moscow when the media began its attacks. US allies are “nervous” over the planned summit, reported Reuters. They did not quote any US ally claiming to be nervous, but they did speculate that both the UK and Ukraine would not be happy were the US and Russia to improve relations. But why is that? The current Ukrainian government is only in power because the Obama Administration launched a coup against its democratically-elected president to put US puppets in charge. They’re right to be nervous. And the British government is also right to be worried. They swore that Russia was behind the “poisoning” of the Skripals without providing any evidence to back up their claims. Hundreds of Russian diplomats were expelled from Western countries on their word alone. And over the past couple of months, each of their claims has fallen short.
At the extreme of the reaction to Bolton’s Russia trip was the US-funded think tank, the Atlantic Council, which is stuck in a 1950s time warp. Its resident Russia “expert,” Anders Åslund, Tweeted that long-time Russia hawk Bolton had been “captured by the Kremlin” and must now be considered a Russian agent for having helped set up a meeting between Trump and Putin. Do they really prefer nuclear war?
The “experts” are usually wrong when it comes to peacemaking. They rely on having “official enemies” for their very livelihood. In 1985, national security “expert” Zbigniew Brzezinski attacked the idea of a summit between President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It was “demeaning” and “tactically unwise,” he said as reported at the time by the Washington Times. Such a meeting would only “elevate” Gorbachev and make him “first among equals,” he said. Thankfully, Reagan did engage Gorbachev in several summits and the rest is history. Brzezinski was wrong and peacemakers were right.
President Trump should understand that any move toward better relations with Russia has been already pre-approved by the American people. His position on Russia was well known. He campaigned very clearly on the idea that the US should end the hostility toward Russia that characterized the Obama Administration and find a way to work together. Voters knew his position and they chose him over Hillary Clinton, who was also very clear on Russia: more confrontation and more aggression.
President Trump would be wise to ignore the neocon talking heads and think tank “experts” paid by defense contractors. He should ignore the “never Trumpers” who have yet to make a coherent policy argument opposing the president. The extent of their opposition to Trump seems to be “he’s mean and rude.” Let us hope that a Trump/Putin meeting begins a move toward real reconciliation and away from the threat of nuclear war.
Copyright © 2018 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Invalid Link Removed
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute
Invalid Link Removed
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Just checking in to see how that whole North Korea thing is going lmao
Cgkone
Well-known member
Your thought on SC pick?Who’s Afraid of the Trump/Putin Summit?
Written by Ron Paul
Monday July 2, 2018
President Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton was in Moscow last week organizing what promises to be an historic summit meeting between his boss and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bolton, who has for years demanded that the US inflict “pain” on Russia and on Putin specifically, was tasked by Trump to change his tune. He was forced to shed some of his neoconservative skin and get involved in peacemaking. Trump surely deserves some credit for that!
As could be expected given the current political climate in the US, the neoconservatives have joined up with the anti-Trump forces on the Left -- and US client states overseas -- to vigorously oppose any movement toward peace with Russia. The mainstream media is, as also to be expected, amplifying every objection to any step away from a confrontation with Russia.
Bolton had hardly left Moscow when the media began its attacks. US allies are “nervous” over the planned summit, reported Reuters. They did not quote any US ally claiming to be nervous, but they did speculate that both the UK and Ukraine would not be happy were the US and Russia to improve relations. But why is that? The current Ukrainian government is only in power because the Obama Administration launched a coup against its democratically-elected president to put US puppets in charge. They’re right to be nervous. And the British government is also right to be worried. They swore that Russia was behind the “poisoning” of the Skripals without providing any evidence to back up their claims. Hundreds of Russian diplomats were expelled from Western countries on their word alone. And over the past couple of months, each of their claims has fallen short.
At the extreme of the reaction to Bolton’s Russia trip was the US-funded think tank, the Atlantic Council, which is stuck in a 1950s time warp. Its resident Russia “expert,” Anders Åslund, Tweeted that long-time Russia hawk Bolton had been “captured by the Kremlin” and must now be considered a Russian agent for having helped set up a meeting between Trump and Putin. Do they really prefer nuclear war?
The “experts” are usually wrong when it comes to peacemaking. They rely on having “official enemies” for their very livelihood. In 1985, national security “expert” Zbigniew Brzezinski attacked the idea of a summit between President Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It was “demeaning” and “tactically unwise,” he said as reported at the time by the Washington Times. Such a meeting would only “elevate” Gorbachev and make him “first among equals,” he said. Thankfully, Reagan did engage Gorbachev in several summits and the rest is history. Brzezinski was wrong and peacemakers were right.
President Trump should understand that any move toward better relations with Russia has been already pre-approved by the American people. His position on Russia was well known. He campaigned very clearly on the idea that the US should end the hostility toward Russia that characterized the Obama Administration and find a way to work together. Voters knew his position and they chose him over Hillary Clinton, who was also very clear on Russia: more confrontation and more aggression.
President Trump would be wise to ignore the neocon talking heads and think tank “experts” paid by defense contractors. He should ignore the “never Trumpers” who have yet to make a coherent policy argument opposing the president. The extent of their opposition to Trump seems to be “he’s mean and rude.” Let us hope that a Trump/Putin meeting begins a move toward real reconciliation and away from the threat of nuclear war.
Copyright2018 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Invalid Link Removed
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute
Invalid Link Removed
2018 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
ax1
Legend
I dunno anything about him. My guess is he will be another false left/right paradigm typical unconstitutional big government war mongering establishment demon and play the same old tyrannical games the rest of the sulfuric acid infested cesspool that the Supreme Court is. None of them believe in human nature and we simply replaced 1 of 9 Darth Vaders with a new Darth Vader.
ax1
Legend
Obama said the same thing, he is even a "Constitutional Scholar" ROFFFLLLL!!!!!
What they say and what they do are two entirely different things.
Im still with you on the Hitlery comment, but Repubicans are socialist as well for the most part and are profiteers behind the scenes such as John Boner made some dough on Obozocare stocks.
Rand Paul for 2020! Leave the Republicrat party and run as a I or L!!!
ax1
Legend
His mentor is Frank Marshall Davis who was a American communist on hte FBI watchlist living in Hawaii when he was a little boy who then later followed him to Chicago, thats how Barry Soetoro ended up there.
On another note, Frank was possibly Obama's mother's porn photographer.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
ax1
Legend
As in society, yes. In the upper pyramid of politics they just become whatever pays the most....for the most part. (not total pessimist here, lol, just close!)
ax1
Legend
She is way better looking than that tranny Michelle!!!!!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Cgkone
Well-known member
PHD in his moms basement. 30 different online accounts 45 different identities.
Shut up punk. Broke ass lame. You need to borrow 40 buck so you can get a new video game and stop pouting?
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
You're too easy and I didn't even mention your own tranny. What are you talking about identities? This is my only one.
ax1
Legend
No homo here, but I call it as I see it. Obama is WAAAAY better looking than Dump. Not that it matters but just saying lol
ax1
Legend
Dennis Kucinich has one of the hottest wives in the history of congress
Invalid Link Removed
ax1
Legend
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
Trump taking care of terrorists, both foreign and domestic!
Trump taking care of terrorists, both foreign and domestic!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Well there's a Freudian slip
Cgkone
Well-known member
Haha. That was actually funny.
Mom must have helped you with that one.
Ill fix it, dont want to confuse you.
Or.... Don-Jon to Confucius.
Cgkone
Well-known member
Yeah right.
Your a fraud and a troll.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
We'll see.
Cgkone
Well-known member
Still trying to figure out which one you are on 420.
Probably have several, who knows.
I don't really care. Just think its strange.
You stalking me on weed forums is strange.
Shoot me your email ill send you a full body shot for your bedroom wall.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Still trying to figure out which one you are on 420.
Probably have several, who knows.
I don't really care. Just think its strange.
You stalking me on weed forums is strange.
Shoot me your email ill send you a full body shot for your bedroom wall.
I'm not on any of your pothead websites, but feel free to keep looking.
Cgkone
Well-known member
Cool. Then your a stalker.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Because I respond to your retarded posts that are directed to me? Or do you mean because I like to know who is hiding behind a keyboard and talking about my family?
Cgkone
Well-known member
Whatever. Dish it out but can't take it. You talk smack I talk it better.
You stalked me bro.
Listen don't try and talk **** if you don't like it talked back.
I'm good either way. We can start from right now.
We can discuss topics civilly, or We can continue the school yard stuff.
Your call. I'm down either way.
Cgkone
Well-known member
And obviously I'm not hiding. There are pictures of me with 100 plants on my property online. I'm actually who I say I am.
ax1
Legend
Dump meeting up with Putin? Bad!
Reagan and Gorbachev? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Nixon and Chairman Mao? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Obama and Princess of Shaving Saudi Labias? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Reagan and Suharto? Good
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Jimmy Carter’s and the Shah of Iran? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Ohhhh the hypocrisy!
Reagan and Gorbachev? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Nixon and Chairman Mao? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Obama and Princess of Shaving Saudi Labias? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Reagan and Suharto? Good
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Jimmy Carter’s and the Shah of Iran? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev? Good!
Dump and Putin? Bad!
Ohhhh the hypocrisy!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
There were people saying good and bad for all of those. Hell, most people in this thread screamed bad for Obama meeting with anybody. That said, all of those former Presidents went into the meetings praising the US, not bashing their own country and turning on allies. I just hope they've iced down Trump's chair on Air Force One because Putin doesn't seem like the kind of guy to use lube.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
And now Trump just publicly stated that he believes Russian intel over US intel about Russian messing with the election. Maybe he doesn't understand what "first" means.
jameschoi
Well-known member
TRUMP SAYS HE HAS `GREAT CONFIDENCE IN MY KGB & MILITARY GRU ASSETS,errrr,I MEAN US INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES'
ax1
Legend
I would believe Pinocchio over US Intelligence any time of day.
The problem with Dump is that he really supports and props up the very same intel swamp he publicly appears to be against. Dump will change nothing.
ax1
Legend
All known communists at that time period in the US were for the most part on FBI watchlists, and Obama's potential seamen origin (at minimum one of Obamas main mentors which he admitted in his book and in a 90s lecture)was an established Communist.
ax1
Legend
And of course I hate Obama, he is a mass murdering genocidalist big bank corporate military industrial complex war mongering lunatic and ruined the lives of millions of people all over the middle east, Ukraine and other places. Are you defending a mass murderer again?