Donald Trump running for president

Misfit28 said:
You are so hilarious. Dislike is too weak of a word, buttercup :)

I actually live in Trump country, so I deal with much worse than you could ever come up with on the regular. Better up your game.

Your psychological profile seems interesting. You seem to be projecting a lot of insecurity onto others.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty secure. Who knows though.
 
Cgkone said:
Well south sac has a plethora of people.
Like I said earlier, dudes fresh out prison are getting labor jobs.
Click to expand...

Aren't those generally the type of jobs ex-cons get right out of prison?

What specifically (and better yet, what Trump administration policy) has led to your perception that everyone you know is doing better?
 
Misfit28 said:
Aren't those generally the type of jobs ex-cons get right out of prison?

What specifically (and better yet, what Trump administration policy) has led to your perception that everyone you know is doing better?
Click to expand...

I wondering how the children who had their parents blown up in front of them with love bombs in the middle-east feel about his statement?
 
ax1 said:
I wondering how the children who had their parents blown up in front of them with love bombs in the middle-east feel about his statement?
Click to expand...

Yep. Obama dropped a lot of bombs too, but so far Trump has exceeded even that. So much for his warnings about Hillary being "hawkish". Looks like he is no better.
 
Misfit28 said:
Aren't those generally the type of jobs ex-cons get right out of prison?

What specifically (and better yet, what Trump administration policy) has led to your perception that everyone you know is doing better?
Click to expand...
Nope.
Well not in 2010-2015.
Go back and catch up in the thread.
Dude Craigslist has a jobs section a mile long.
EVERYBODY is getting a bigger paycheck because the tax cut.
Contractors and journey men were hurting with Obama.
There is work everywhere now. Literally every trade has a guy hiring right now.
Its close to the economy when bill Clinton was President. It was so easy to get work under Bill Clinton. Its that easy right now.
I'm basing it on jobs.
I've lived in south sac for 8 years. More people are working now than in all the 8 years I've lived here.
Its not my perception. Do you think people are morehappier with the economy now or less?
Jobs bro, you know the things that catapult you into success.
What don't you like about the economy?
Too much work? Too many minorities working. Not enough illegals working?
Not enough people collecting welfare.
 
In honor of those whom are truly seeking asylum and safety for their children in the United States.
I'll leave you with a song that speaks to my heart.
Invalid Link Removed

Amen.

Continue the 'discussion'..
 
Cgkone said:
Trump has exceeded Barry's bomb dropping?
Click to expand...

Let me clarify that, he is on track to exceed Obama in that area. I misspoke. I'm sure by the end of his first term there will be lots of dead civilians, just like all the presidents before him.

I will not defend Obama on bombings or drone strikes. He has an abysmal track record with both as well. Trump could have changed that, warned that Hillary would continue it, and it seems that he is ramping it up even more.
 
Luckily the Trump administration and their supporters are so bloodthirsty that they brag about the numbers, so maybe we will see a more accurate number.
 
Cgkone said:
You mean Barry's carnage?
Click to expand...

Dumps is only Barry Soetoro’s 3rd term for the most part when it comes to foreign policy of interventionism and running the global empire.

I just call it as I see it, and we don’t have much different so far.
 
I'm looking for the actual numbers, but they are kinda hard to find.

I found this on a website: " In his second term, they have dropped four times that number, bringing the total for Obama’s presidency to over 100,000 bombs and missiles striking seven countries, surpassing the 70,000 unleashed on five countries by George W. Bush." I would like to determine the legitimacy of the site, but it sounds correct.

As of October 31, 2017, it looks like 3,554 bombs were dropped in Afghanistan. In 2016, there were 1,337 and in 2015 there were 947.

Since the beginning of 2017, there have been 28 drone strikes in Somalia. In 2016, there were 15. The source (I'll link the article) also says that more civilians have been killed under Trump while battling ISIS than under Obama.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Misfit28 said:
I'm looking for the actual numbers, but they are kinda hard to find.

I found this on a website: " In his second term, they have dropped four times that number, bringing the total for Obama’s presidency to over 100,000 bombs and missiles striking seven countries, surpassing the 70,000 unleashed on five countries by George W. Bush." I would like to determine the legitimacy of the site, but it sounds correct.

As of October 31, 2017, it looks like 3,554 bombs were dropped in Afghanistan. In 2016, there were 1,337 and in 2015 there were 947.

Since the beginning of 2017, there have been 28 drone strikes in Somalia. In 2016, there were 15. The source (I'll link the article) also says that more civilians have been killed under Trump while battling ISIS than under Obama.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Last stats I heard about a week ago is that someone/s is bombed every 12 minutes by the US alone... and 98% of them are all innocent civilians.

As far as I’m concerned to this day, Donald Dump went from being a cuddly celebrity to a mass genicidalist and should be arrested for war crimes.
 
ax1 said:
Last stats I heard about a week ago is that someone/s is bombed every 12 minutes by the US alone... and 98% of them are all innocent civilians.

As far as I’m concerned to this day, Donald Dump went from being a cuddly celebrity to a mass genicidalist and should be arrested for war crimes.
Click to expand...

"According to research from the nonprofit monitoring group Airwars, the first seven months of the Trump administration have already resulted in more civilian deaths than under the entirety of the Obama administration. Airwars reports that under Obama’s leadership, the fight against IS led to approximately 2,300 to 3,400 civilian deaths. Through the first seven months of the Trump administration, they estimate that coalition air strikes have killed between 2,800 and 4,500 civilians.

Researchers also point to another stunning trend – the “frequent killing of entire families in likely coalition airstrikes.” In May, for example, such actions led to the deaths of at least 57 women and 52 children in Iraq and Syria.

The vast increase in civilian deaths is not limited to the anti-IS campaign. In Afghanistan, the U.N. reports a 67 percent increase in civilian deaths from U.S. airstrikes in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first half of 2016."

Look at this: Invalid Link Removed
 
Misfit28 said:
"According to research from the nonprofit monitoring group Airwars, the first seven months of the Trump administration have already resulted in more civilian deaths than under the entirety of the Obama administration. Airwars reports that under Obama’s leadership, the fight against IS led to approximately 2,300 to 3,400 civilian deaths. Through the first seven months of the Trump administration, they estimate that coalition air strikes have killed between 2,800 and 4,500 civilians.

Researchers also point to another stunning trend – the “frequent killing of entire families in likely coalition airstrikes.” In May, for example, such actions led to the deaths of at least 57 women and 52 children in Iraq and Syria.

The vast increase in civilian deaths is not limited to the anti-IS campaign. In Afghanistan, the U.N. reports a 67 percent increase in civilian deaths from U.S. airstrikes in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first half of 2016."

Look at this: Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
Interesting. I believe it, the first 7 months was going heavily after ISIS. Those guys lurk in heavily populated areas for protection right?
Weird how the trump hating media hasn't played this info everywhere.

On a side note, nonprofit dosnt automatically mean unbias.
 
Misfit28 said:
"According to research from the nonprofit monitoring group Airwars, the first seven months of the Trump administration have already resulted in more civilian deaths than under the entirety of the Obama administration. Airwars reports that under Obama’s leadership, the fight against IS led to approximately 2,300 to 3,400 civilian deaths. Through the first seven months of the Trump administration, they estimate that coalition air strikes have killed between 2,800 and 4,500 civilians.

Researchers also point to another stunning trend – the “frequent killing of entire families in likely coalition airstrikes.” In May, for example, such actions led to the deaths of at least 57 women and 52 children in Iraq and Syria.

The vast increase in civilian deaths is not limited to the anti-IS campaign. In Afghanistan, the U.N. reports a 67 percent increase in civilian deaths from U.S. airstrikes in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first half of 2016."

Look at this: Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Probably enough bombs to build 5 of those stupid walls he seeks financing for and rebuild some of our infrastructure.
 
Cgkone said:
Interesting. I believe it, the first 7 months was going heavily after ISIS. Those guys lurk in heavily populated areas for protection right?
Weird how the trump hating media hasn't played this info everywhere.

On a side note, nonprofit dosnt automatically mean unbias.
Click to expand...

The media msnbc,CiaNN, fox and other are nothing but a bunch of war mongering military industrial complex terrorists...guns are bad, bombs are good.
 
Cgkone said:
Interesting. I believe it, the first 7 months was going heavily after ISIS. Those guys lurk in heavily populated areas for protection right?
Weird how the trump hating media hasn't played this info everywhere.

On a side note, nonprofit dosnt automatically mean unbias.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know that. However, they seem to be as accurate as anything else you can find out there. Maybe even more accurate, since they include civilian AND military sources.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Cgkone said:
WORD
Click to expand...

Yup, media and libtards, disrupting the country, anti-american fools protesting everything. Economy is rocking, people should be happy, not libtards, they suck Bathhouse Barry's ****. **** yourselves ya libtard douche-bags. Trump ****ing rules... My stocks and 401K's are doing amazing, went down the ****ter w/ Muzzie Barry in office and his gorilla wife husband. Kuntz...
 
Power-Lift said:
Yup, media and libtards, disrupting the country, anti-american fools protesting everything. Economy is rocking, people should be happy, not libtards, they suck Bathhouse Barry's ****. **** yourselves ya libtard douche-bags. Trump ****ing rules... My stocks and 401K's are doing amazing, went down the ****ter w/ Muzzie Barry in office and his gorilla wife husband. Kuntz...
Click to expand...
Tell us how you really feel.
 
Power-Lift said:
Yup, media and libtards, disrupting the country, anti-american fools protesting everything. Economy is rocking, people should be happy, not libtards, they suck Bathhouse Barry's ****. **** yourselves ya libtard douche-bags. Trump ****ing rules... My stocks and 401K's are doing amazing, went down the ****ter w/ Muzzie Barry in office and his gorilla wife husband. Kuntz...
Click to expand...
LOL.
 
Trump supporter: bitches about the media in politics, but perfectly cool with Trump hiring an ex president of Fox as a deputy chief of staff lmao
 
Cgkone said:
yup. liberals are pulling their hair out.
Click to expand...

Napolitano is a fairly libertarian Constitutionalist which certainly doesnt correlate with big government libtards, but may bother big government conservitards as well especially the war hawks.
 
ax1 said:
Napolitano is a fairly libertarian Constitutionalist which certainly doesnt correlate with big government libtards, but may bother big government conservitards as well especially the war hawks.
Click to expand...
Id be cool with Napolitano. That s not who he will appoint. I meant the fact that Trump gets to appoint another judge to the supreme court has got to be crushing dems. It was a very important election I deed.
 
Cgkone said:
Id be cool with Napolitano. That s not who he will appoint. I meant the fact that Trump gets to appoint another judge to the supreme court has got to be crushing dems. It was a very important election I deed.
Click to expand...

Jesus christ man. Take 2 minutes to at least get a summary of who/what somebody is talking about before the moronic "libtards are gonna hate this". And no, that's not a direct quote because I spelled everything correctly.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Jesus christ man. Take 2 minutes to at least get a summary of who/what somebody is talking about before the moronic "libtards are gonna hate this". And no, that's not a direct quote because I spelled everything correctly.
Click to expand...
Dems would hate Andrew Napolitano.
For one he frequents fox.
So again, your bumping your gums.
I know exactly who we are talking about AND dems would hate it.
 
Cgkone said:
Good ! Dems are going to kick and scream.
I don't think he gets the nod though. But that would be cool.
Click to expand...
So, why do you take so much pleasure in the discomfort of liberals?

Why do you call them libtards?

Did you have a traumatic experience in your youth?
 
Cgkone said:
Dems would hate Andrew Napolitano.
For one he frequents fox.
So again, your bumping your gums.
I know exactly who we are talking about AND dems would hate it.
Click to expand...

You just had a knee jerk reaction and then were told why you're wrong. But hey, keep wishing for justices that want to take your garden away.
 
Misfit28 said:
So, why do you take so much pleasure in the discomfort of liberals?

Why do you call them libtards?

Did you have a traumatic experience in your youth?
Click to expand...

He grows pot in California. His entire income is based on what liberals have allowed to happen. I'm willing to bet money that he can't actually even define what a liberal is. He only knows that the internet told him it's a bad thing.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You just had a knee jerk reaction and then were told why you're wrong. But hey, keep wishing for justices that want to take your garden away.
Click to expand...
Bro I've been growing weed before it was cool.
Northern California has it on lock and always will.
My initial reaction was correct. Dems will flip! Kick and scream about how awful Napolitano is.
He's anti-abortion bro. Case closed. Dems love abortion. They think its a woman's number one concern.
 
Cgkone said:
Bro I've been growing weed before it was cool.
Northern California has it on lock and always will.
My initial reaction was correct. Dems will flip! Kick and scream about how awful Napolitano is.
He's anti-abortion bro. Case closed. Dems love abortion. They think its a woman's number one concern.
Click to expand...
Wow, you are truly ignorant.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
At this point I'm expecting everybody to come from Fox. Sean Hannity will certainly get a spot once he grows tired of pulling strings from behind the curtain.
Click to expand...

The only people I like on Fox are 1. John Stossel (is he even on there anymore? One of my favorite people in the world) and 2. Napolitano. I kinda dig Tucker Carsons views a bit. I dont tune into Fox much at all really, that channel as a whole makes me vomit blood. They run are by a bunch of hypocritical big government propagandist tyrannical war mongering lunatics just like the rest of TV.
 
Cgkone said:
Dems would hate Andrew Napolitano.
For one he frequents fox.
So again, your bumping your gums.
I know exactly who we are talking about AND dems would hate it.
Click to expand...

At this point Dump can pick Obama for Supreme Court and "dems" would still hate it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top