Donald Trump running for president

[youngandfree]

Invalid Link Removed

Comey wrote a memo about his conversation with Trump. No where has it been reported that anyone else has it, or has seen it. The NYT reported he "shared the existence of it". Have you been under a rock for 2 days. That's all the media has talked about. Comey wrote a note to himself detailing what a conversation allegedly was about. NYT hasn't seen it. No public officials have admitted they've seen it. The only basis for the entire uproar this week is that Comey leaked it to NYT after he got fired.

 

[youngandfree]

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed


Invalid Link Removed

 

[Aleksandar37]

Invalid Link Removed

Comey wrote a memo about his conversation with Trump. No where has it been reported that anyone else has it, or has seen it. The NYT reported he "shared the existence of it". Have you been under a rock for 2 days. That's all the media has talked about. Comey wrote a note to himself detailing what a conversation allegedly was about. NYT hasn't seen it. No public officials have admitted they've seen it. The only basis for the entire uproar this week is that Comey leaked it to NYT after he got fired.

He shared his memos with his aides. That has been reported repeatedly everywhere. Even in the link you posted, it literally says that others have read his memos.

 

[Aleksandar37]

Invalid Link Removed

Direct quote from your article: 'In the memo, which Comey shared with top FBI associates, he wrote that Trump said, "I hope you can let this go," referring to the inquiry into Flynn's actions. "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go," said Trump, according to a source who read the memo. "He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."'

Tell me which words you're struggling with and I'll try and help.

 

[Jiigzz]

Obama is a mass murdering genocidalist and a dividing racist, the fact people are defending him in any way is shocking.

Can I ask though - seriously - how did he promote racial segregation initially? I do know he made it worse, maybe accidently, by inviting members to the white house and funding, but not every single white person or black person would know this. In fact most won't.

The huge spikes are also driven now by our obsession with cell phones and media (including facebook, twitter and insta) which also blew up in popularity and accessibility when they were adapted for mobiles. Mobile development has grown astronomically since Obama came into office, and so this has also played a HUGE role in how news and media is spead and shared.

With more and more people connecting daily to Facebook (highest usage per day of any app ever per person) and sharing everything, the chances of race hate being spread is much higher and shared with more people.

Regardless of your opinion of Obama, you cannot deny social media has also started social implosion and created a platformed accessed by nearly the entire connected population.

Hate spreads faster than love

 

[youngandfree]

Direct quote from your article: 'In the memo, which Comey shared with top FBI associates, he wrote that Trump said, "I hope you can let this go," referring to the inquiry into Flynn's actions. "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go," said Trump, according to a source who read the memo. "He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."'

Tell me which words you're struggling with and I'll try and help.

Sharing the memo doesn't mean it's been run up the chain for criminal investigation.

"Mr. Comey shared the existence of the memo with senior F.B.I. officials and close associates."

Sharing the existence of it means he told them he made it. The two people that claim to have read it can't be verified, and aren't willing to put their name to it. That's part of the problem. Where are the "top FBI
associates"?

Comey told someone about his notes that he knew would tell the press. If he was worried about his duties, it would have come out sooner.

 

[youngandfree]

Invalid Link Removed

Have you forgotten about the fake dossier that got reported for days before anyone reported that it was made up?

 

[ax1]

Can I ask though - seriously - how did he promote racial segregation initially? I do know he made it worse, maybe accidently, by inviting members to the white house and funding, but not every single white person or black person would know this. In fact most won't.

The huge spikes are also driven now by our obsession with cell phones and media (including facebook, twitter and insta) which also blew up in popularity and accessibility when they were adapted for mobiles. Mobile development has grown astronomically since Obama came into office, and so this has also played a HUGE role in how news and media is spead and shared.

With more and more people connecting daily to Facebook (highest usage per day of any app ever per person) and sharing everything, the chances of race hate being spread is much higher and shared with more people.

Regardless of your opinion of Obama, you cannot deny social media has also started social implosion and created a platformed accessed by nearly the entire connected population.

Hate spreads faster than love

I agree with you 100% with the new age of cell phones and social media, but keep in mind this is now the new platform for government and its associates (such as in Obama case George Soros groups, Media Matters, its support of the racist group BLMatters and much much more) to infiltrate propaganda directly into social media and propel an agenda and manipulate people especially the youth.

Now, also keep in mind we also have the Mainstream media group which is controlled by its financiers and CIA (CIA by law) that makes it appear as if shyt is flying into racial Armageddon when nothing could be further from the truth. America today is the least if not one of the least racist countries in the Universe and without a doubt the most open and tolerant to other races and cultures.

 

[youngandfree]

Can I ask though - seriously - how did he promote racial segregation initially? I do know he made it worse, maybe accidently, by inviting members to the white house and funding, but not every single white person or black person would know this. In fact most won't.

The huge spikes are also driven now by our obsession with cell phones and media (including facebook, twitter and insta) which also blew up in popularity and accessibility when they were adapted for mobiles. Mobile development has grown astronomically since Obama came into office, and so this has also played a HUGE role in how news and media is spead and shared.

With more and more people connecting daily to Facebook (highest usage per day of any app ever per person) and sharing everything, the chances of race hate being spread is much higher and shared with more people.

Regardless of your opinion of Obama, you cannot deny social media has also started social implosion and created a platformed accessed by nearly the entire connected population.

Hate spreads faster than love

Invalid Link Removed

Here's an interesting commentary on Obama's influence on race issues in America.

Of course smart phones played a big roll, since the community organizer and his supporters used it to further spread their message of hate. Keep in mind that Obama spent a couple decades in a church led by the racist Jeremiah Wright.

 

[ax1]

Invalid Link Removed

Here's an interesting commentary on Obama's influence on race issues in America.

Of course smart phones played a big roll, since the community organizer and his supporters used it to further spread their message of hate. Keep in mind that Obama spent a couple decades in a church led by the racist Jeremiah Wright.

Remember when Obama "liberated" Lybia with his love bombs and and drones of compassion? Afterwards the rebels he had supported were rounding up black people around the country and were executing them and Obama didnt say a single word about it.

Obama has more death and blood of black people on his hands than any other American alive. He is worse than any typical racist.

 

[ax1]

Sweden drops investigation into WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

Whether or not he'll walk free depends on the UK.

Steve Dent
engadget
5/19/2017

Sweden has dropped its investigation into Julian Assange over allegations of rape, dramatically changing the plot in a standoff that has lasted seven years. The charges were first leveled at the WikiLeaks founder in 2010, and he sought asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in 2012 after losing a series of appeal. He's been sequestered there in a cramped living space ever since.

The Ecuadorian embassy is currently guarded around the clock by London's Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to prevent Assange from escaping. However, it released a statement saying that while Assange "remains wanted for a much less serious offense," it said that it would now provide a "proportionate" level of resources, meaning it may let its round-the-clock guards stand down.

That finally opens the possibility of Assange leaving his mini quarters in the embassy. His lawyers have said, however, that he wouldn't leave without assurances from the UK government that he could be extradited to the US over spying charges linked to his online activities with Wikileaks.

Original article (nothing else to see here): Invalid Link Removed

Wikileaks twitter announcement: Invalid Link Removed

 

[Aleksandar37]

Comey has it, he doesn't work for the FBI any more. If it was such a criminal act or gesture for Trump to make the statement he did, why did he not run it up the flagpole when it happened? That's right, cause Comey has no integrity and only looks out for himself. He makes the allegation a couple days after he gets canned, instead when the actual "criminal act" happened.

Sharing the memo doesn't mean it's been run up the chain for criminal investigation.

"Mr. Comey shared the existence of the memo with senior F.B.I. officials and close associates."

Sharing the existence of it means he told them he made it. The two people that claim to have read it can't be verified, and aren't willing to put their name to it. That's part of the problem. Where are the "top FBI
associates"?

Comey told someone about his notes that he knew would tell the press. If he was worried about his duties, it would have come out sooner.

Oh boy Simple Jack, you've gone full retard again. I'm citing the articles that you are posting. You don't get to use references as support and attack them as bs.

 

[youngandfree]

Oh boy Simple Jack, you've gone full retard again. I'm citing the articles that you are posting. You don't get to use references as support and attack them as bs.

None of those article say who has seen the memo, do they? All unnamed sources, which are unverifiable. Btw, I'm not attacking the source,I'm disputing your take on it.

 

[ax1]

Trump press coverage 'sets new standard' for negativity: Study

• A Harvard study found that 80 percent of Trump coverage was negative during his first 100 days in office.
• Trump's high point with the media was after the Syria strike; the low point came during an unsuccessful effort to overturn Obamacare.

President Donald Trump's early days in office were subjected to almost universally negative news coverage, a Harvard study has found.

The Trump presidency is "setting a new standard for unfavorable press coverage of a president," according to the report from Thomas E. Patterson, professor of government and the press at the Harvard Kennedy School and Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.

The study looked at Trump's first 100 days and examined coverage in the print editions of The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, as well as broadcast outlets CNN, CBS, Fox News and CNBC parent NBC, and European news outlets the Financial Times, BBC and ARD in Germany.

Of the total news stories examined, 41 percent focused on Trump, which was triple the coverage for previous presidents for the same period

And of that group, the tone was resoundingly negative — 80 percent of all stories, to be exact. That would be just shy of double the first 100 days of Barack Obama and significantly more than George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

Trump frequently has criticized his coverage, stating this week that "no politician in history" has been treated worse.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[Aleksandar37]

None of those article say who has seen the memo, do they? All unnamed sources, which are unverifiable. Btw, I'm not attacking the source,I'm disputing your take on it.

Then where is the article that says Comey took it with him? That was your original statement that I questioned. You can keep trying to change the subject, but I am asking where you got that information from since you claim to not have made it up.

 

[thebigt]

trump's presidency is the most transparent in my memory....what modern president could hold up to the scrutiny that trump is under, with every move being leaked?

 

[youngandfree]

Then where is the article that says Comey took it with him? That was your original statement that I questioned. You can keep trying to change the subject, but I am asking where you got that information from since you claim to not have made it up.

Where is the article that says any higher official has it?

 

[Aleksandar37]

Where is the article that says any higher official has it?

I posted a quote from a link you provided that states top FBI officials have been shown the memo. You are questioning the merits of the article, which you posted because they didn't name actual names.

So either present a reference that supports your claim about Comey still having the memo or stop crying when I accuse you of making crap up.

 

[youngandfree]

I posted a quote from a link you provided that states top FBI officials have been shown the memo. You are questioning the merits of the article, which you posted because they didn't name actual names.

So either present a reference that supports your claim about Comey still having the memo or stop crying when I accuse you of making crap up.

Why haven't top FBI officials come out and said we have it? Who's a top FBI official? What's their position? Is it even true?

That's the point I'm trying to make. Comey showing someone a memo isnt necessarily the same as the FBI has the memo.

 

[thebigt]

Why haven't top FBI officials come out and said we have it? Who's a top FBI official? What's their position? Is it even true?

That's the point I'm trying to make. Comey showing someone a memo isnt necessarily the same as the FBI has the memo.

the real question should be---how do we know that there isn't collusion between comey and his buddies in the fbi to fabricate the whole memo thing....with all the conspiracy theories the democrats and media are putting out there, why not add one more, lol.

 

[Aleksandar37]

Why haven't top FBI officials come out and said we have it? Who's a top FBI official? What's their position? Is it even true?

That's the point I'm trying to make. Comey showing someone a memo isnt necessarily the same as the FBI has the memo.

I don't care about any of those questions and never claimed to have information outside of the articles you posted. I asked you a very simple question and you don't have an answer other than you make crap up, so you continue to try and change the subject. Maybe move on

 

[youngandfree]

I don't care about any of those questions and never claimed to have information outside of the articles you posted. I asked you a very simple question and you don't have an answer other than you make crap up, so you continue to try and change the subject. Maybe move on

Of couse you don't care that no official has come out to say we have it, we've seen it, we are looking into it, because you're a Trump hater.

Considering the lefts track record of making stuff up and reporting it as fact, it's a very relevant and important part of the story. Again, remember the fake dossier they reported that said Trump hired prostitutes to is on a bed? They rode that story for days. Then they came out and said that the intelligence officials made it up and told Trump about it to show him how bad things get spread. It was complete and utter BS.

Look, you infer from the articles that FBI officials have the "secret memo", yet no one has officially made that statement. I infer from the same articles that all say unnamed people "have been told of its existence", or "top FBI officials have seen it" doesn't give any credibility to the story at all, and doesn't mean that any "top FBI official" actually has the memo and is going to look into it. Remember in a court, there has to be physical evidence, or a person that testifies they personally saw something. No one has personally put their name to the story saying they've seen it. Only an anonymous source that "read parts of the memo" over the phone to a reporter, and said "yeah, other people have seen this."

I didn't make anything up, so you can stop barking up that tree. It's interpreting the narrative, that's been reported so far by lefty Trump hating news organizations that have made known their desire to take Trump down.

 

[ax1]

Dump who hates ISIS because they behead people, persecute christians, follow radical islam and oppress women got a medal today, Saudi Arabia's highest honor from the Beheader in Chief Prince Satanmad who leads as global leaders in beheading people, persecuting christians, following radical islam and oppression women beyond belief. In return the Beheaders in Chief get a 100 million arms deal, 55 million arms deal and most likely behind closed doors giftes Prince Satanmad the most beautiful peace of chocolate cake you have ever seen.

This is nothing but the continuation of endless hypocrisy of US policies supported by Demicans and Republicrats, so much for draining the swamp.

 

[Aleksandar37]

Of couse you don't care that no official has come out to say we have it, we've seen it, we are looking into it, because you're a Trump hater.

Considering the lefts track record of making stuff up and reporting it as fact, it's a very relevant and important part of the story. Again, remember the fake dossier they reported that said Trump hired prostitutes to is on a bed? They rode that story for days. Then they came out and said that the intelligence officials made it up and told Trump about it to show him how bad things get spread. It was complete and utter BS.

Look, you infer from the articles that FBI officials have the "secret memo", yet no one has officially made that statement. I infer from the same articles that all say unnamed people "have been told of its existence", or "top FBI officials have seen it" doesn't give any credibility to the story at all, and doesn't mean that any "top FBI official" actually has the memo and is going to look into it. Remember in a court, there has to be physical evidence, or a person that testifies they personally saw something. No one has personally put their name to the story saying they've seen it. Only an anonymous source that "read parts of the memo" over the phone to a reporter, and said "yeah, other people have seen this."

I didn't make anything up, so you can stop barking up that tree. It's interpreting the narrative, that's been reported so far by lefty Trump hating news organizations that have made known their desire to take Trump down.

Again, I asked you a very sinple question. You made a statement and I asked where your source for that statement is. Can you answer that? Apparently not, so you accuse me of random crap and continue to try and change the subject. Your arguments don't even make sense and you seem to think that you can overcompensate some serious deficiencies with volume.

At this point I'm not sure you even understand what a memo is. You stated that Comey has the memo. Right there you admit that the memo exists, because you claim somebody (i.e. Comey) has it. Where did you get the information that Comey has the memo? I'm not saying if he does or doesn't have it; I'm asking where you got your information from.

 

[youngandfree]

Again, I asked you a very sinple question. You made a statement and I asked where your source for that statement is. Can you answer that? Apparently not, so you accuse me of random crap and continue to try and change the subject. Your arguments don't even make sense and you seem to think that you can overcompensate some serious deficiencies with volume.

At this point I'm not sure you even understand what a memo is. You stated that Comey has the memo. Right there you admit that the memo exists, because you claim somebody (i.e. Comey) has it. Where did you get the information that Comey has the memo? I'm not saying if he does or doesn't have it; I'm asking where you got your information from.

All of those articles said he wrote it, and showed it to people. None of them said he gave or sent the memo to anyone else. It's called deductive reasoning, based on the lack of facts presented for the last week.

None of the stories have said he sent the memo to anyone. Theyve said unnamed people "have seen it" or "are aware of its existence". They've characterized it as him making documentation for himself when something goes bad down the road. Which is why it got leaked after he got fired.

 

[Aleksandar37]

All of those articles said he wrote it, and showed it to people. None of them said he gave or sent the memo to anyone else. It's called deductive reasoning, based on the lack of facts presented for the last week.

None of the stories have said he sent the memo to anyone. They've characterized it as him making documentation for himself when something goes bad down the road. Which is why it got leaked after he got fired.

He worked for the FBI. Of course he kept notes. Any investigator from the FBI down to a local detective is going to keep notes. Why do you find note-keeping so odd?

But let's get this straight. You're cherry-picking these articles based on your own bias and lack of experience with the subject. You're choosing to believe the parts of the articles that say there was a memo and the parts that "characterized it as him making documentation for himself when something goes bad down the road", but you're choosing not to believe the parts that state he kept notes for everything during his entire career (which is pretty damn normal for an FBI agent) and you're choosing not to believe the parts that clearly say he shared the memo with others.

And after all of that you don't have a reference to support your statement. Maybe magic elves have the memo. I mean none of the articles say he didn't give it magic elves.

 

[youngandfree]

He worked for the FBI. Of course he kept notes. Any investigator from the FBI down to a local detective is going to keep notes. Why do you find note-keeping so odd?

But let's get this straight. You're cherry-picking these articles based on your own bias and lack of experience with the subject. You're choosing to believe the parts of the articles that say there was a memo and the parts that "characterized it as him making documentation for himself when something goes bad down the road", but you're choosing not to believe the parts that state he kept notes for everything during his entire career (which is pretty damn normal for an FBI agent) and you're choosing not to believe the parts that clearly say he shared the memo with others.

And after all of that you don't have a reference to support your statement. Maybe magic elves have the memo. I mean none of the articles say he didn't give it magic elves.

When did I say him keeping notes is odd and out of sorts for the FBI? Your bias is putting words in my mouth. FOR THE LAST TIME. THE HIT JOB WAS DONE BASED ON A CONVERSATION A NYT WRITER HAD OVER THE PHONE, WITH SOME UNNAMED PERSON CLAIMING TO BE READING THIS MYTHICAL MEMO. NO OFFICIAL IN THE GOVERNMENT HAS COME OUT AND REPORTED THEY'VE SEEN IT OR HAVE IT. THE LAST WEEK HAS BEEN A HIT JOB BASED ON WHAT SOMEONE SAYS THEY SAW, WITH ZERO PERSONAL VERIFICATION FROM SOMEONE IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IF THIS MEMO WAS CREATED BECAUSE COMEY FELT LIKE THE CONVERSATION WAS AN ILLEGAL ACT, WHY DIDN'T HE COME FORWARD WITH IT PRIOR TO HIM GETTING FIRED? WHY DIDN'T HE COME OUT WITH IT AFTER HE GOT FIRED?

The credibility of the left media has proven to be worthless many times based on their reporting of fake stories, such as the "Trump dossier". My point all along is Comey is a puppet, and this is another example of it.

I can show you an email or piece of paper. Does that mean I gave it to you? Nope. Until an official comes out and states we have it and here it is, my opinion won't change. It's been reported numerous times that the memo is unclassified, and they've already spilled what's supposedly in it. So why hasn't anyone produced it?

 

[Aleksandar37]

It's ok little buddy. The magic elves have the memo stored safely away in their enchanted castle where the big bad media can't get to it. Sleep tight.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[thebigt]

lol...the democrats are saying joe Lieberman would be too DIVISIVE....I guess the democrats weren't too concerned about divisiveness when Obama was forcing social changes with his executive orders? yeah, right-putting boys in the girls bathroom wasn't divisive, lol.



it must be sad being a democrat, nothing makes them happy, lol!!!

 

[ax1]

lol...the democrats are saying joe Lieberman would be too DIVISIVE....I guess the democrats weren't too concerned about divisiveness when Obama was forcing social changes with his executive orders? yeah, right-putting boys in the girls bathroom wasn't divisive, lol.



it must be sad being a democrat, nothing makes them happy, lol!!!

I am no fan of Labiaman but dems just keep coming out with more hypocrisy after another.

 

[thebigt]

I am no fan of Labiaman but dems just keep coming out with more hypocrisy after another.

I don't think they realize that there is only so much crap the drain can handle at one time...after awhile it just starts looking like they are full of sh1t, lol.

 

[Jiigzz]

I am no fan of Labiaman but dems just keep coming out with more hypocrisy after another.

I used to think you were crazy, but I just read something about how the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Guatemala with a dictator in order to save a deal on bananas.

Couldn't make this stuff up.

 

[ax1]

I used to think you were crazy, but I just read something about how the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Guatemala with a dictator in order to save a deal on bananas.

Couldn't make this stuff up.

Lol...Ill take that as a compliment I guess.

I think your talking about Guatamala in the 50s which led to the slaughter of 100k+ people, over bananas and Rockefeller's fruits. History keeps repeating itself up to this very day and tomorrow....look more into stuff how the CIA and MI6 overthrew via coup (Operation Ajax) the democratically elected leader of Iran because he wanted to kick Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) (now known as British Petroleum/0 out of his country. They replaced him with the oppressive dictator Mohammad Reza Shah with his secret police, SAVAK,which was as brutal as the Gestapo.. Then you have Saddam Hussein of Iraq installed by the CIA, etc....

Here is a handy timeline of CIA tyranny on one of my go to websites if your into this stuff
Invalid Link Removed

You know, then people here wonder why there are so many terrorists to this day and people that hate us around the world and why I so strongly support Ron Paul and his non-interventionist foreign policy movement.

 

[thebigt]

I used to think you were crazy, but I just read something about how the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Guatemala with a dictator in order to save a deal on bananas.

Couldn't make this stuff up.

hey, man...we americans love our bananas!!!

 

[thebigt]

trump goes to the heart of islam, gives a speech to 50 muslim leaders and is warmly received-he is even treated like royalty by the Saudi's.

now the question is, how can the courts shut down trump's travel ban on the basis he is ANTI-muslim?

 

[thebigt]

Lol...Ill take that as a compliment I guess.

I think your talking about Guatamala in the 50s which led to the slaughter of 100k+ people, over bananas and Rockefeller's fruits. History keeps repeating itself up to this very day and tomorrow....look more into stuff how the CIA and MI6 overthrew via coup (Operation Ajax) the democratically elected leader of Iran because he wanted to kick Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) (now known as British Petroleum/0 out of his country. They replaced him with the oppressive dictator Mohammad Reza Shah with his secret police, SAVAK,which was as brutal as the Gestapo.. Then you have Saddam Hussein of Iraq installed by the CIA, etc....

Here is a handy timeline of CIA tyranny on one of my go to websites if your into this stuff
Invalid Link Removed

You know, then people here wonder why there are so many terrorists to this day and people that hate us around the world and why I so strongly support Ron Paul and his non-interventionist foreign policy movement.

jimmy carter was also a non-interventionist-look where there got us, lol.

 

[ax1]

I used to think you were crazy, but I just read something about how the CIA overthrew a democratically elected leader in Guatemala with a dictator in order to save a deal on bananas.

Couldn't make this stuff up.

Did you know that George W. Bush family bought 300k acres of land in Paraguay just so he can claim ownership to the regions fresh water supply? You know what that leads too, charging their locals for what belongs to them for free under their homeland for a price.
Invalid Link Removed

 

[thebigt]

Did you know that George W. Bush family bought 300k acres of land in Paraguay just so he can claim ownership to the regions fresh water supply? You know what that leads too.
Invalid Link Removed

sounds like he needs some regulators....does GW own cattle?

 

[ax1]

jimmy carter was also a non-interventionist-look where there got us, lol.

I do not consider Jimmy Carter a non-interventionist at all. For example he was aiding President Suharto (Obama's step father was a general under him) at the peak of genocide in East Timor in 77. The Australian parliament informed Carter of the genocide and in response Carter ramped up aid and arms to the brutal regime.

Also under Carter we have the creation of the Moujahedeen which led to Al-queda and Bin-laden.

There is much more but Jimmy Carter is a filthy genocidal maniac in my books.

 

[ax1]

trump goes to the heart of islam, gives a speech to 50 muslim leaders and is warmly received-he is even treated like royalty by the Saudi's.

now the question is, how can the courts shut down trump's travel ban on the basis he is ANTI-muslim?

How can he lecture radical extremists (primarily the Saudi's) about fighting and eliminating radical extremists? Isnt that like telling the "King" of Saudi Arabia to jump off a bridge for the sake of bringing peace to the region? lol The Saudi's belong on the same level as ISIS. They have that black gold and thats all that matters.

 

[thebigt]

How can he lecture radical extremists (primarily the Saudi's) about fighting and eliminating radical extremists? Isnt that like telling the "King" of Saudi Arabia to jump off a bridge for the sake of bringing peace to the region? lol The Saudi's belong on the same level as ISIS. They have that black gold and thats all that matters.

stay on point for just one second---I am referring to the travel ban and judges shooting it down on the basis of trump being anti-muslim.


btw-did you see the fireworks after the dirrell fight last night?

 

[thebigt]

I do not consider Jimmy Carter a non-interventionist at all. For example he was aiding President Suharto (Obama's step father was a general under him) at the peak of genocide in East Timor in 77. The Australian parliament informed Carter of the genocide and in response Carter ramped up aid and arms to the brutal regime.

Also under Carter we have the creation of the Moujahedeen which led to Al-queda and Bin-laden.

There is much more but Jimmy Carter is a filthy genocidal maniac in my books.

it was carters non-intervention in iran that I am talking about....google carter/shah of iran....I disagree with you, carter made some very bad decisions but it was more being in over his head than being bad at heart.

 

[Misfit28]

trump goes to the heart of islam, gives a speech to 50 muslim leaders and is warmly received-he is even treated like royalty by the Saudi's.

now the question is, how can the courts shut down trump's travel ban on the basis he is ANTI-muslim?

And he also bowed, just like Obama

 

[thebigt]

And he also bowed, just like Obama

you are not addressing the question, lol.

 

[thebigt]

anyone remember david Koresh and the branch davidians? when the fbi attacked that 'sect' were they attacking ALL Christians?


trump should make the argument that radical islam is a 'sect', and only that sect is being targeted.

 

[ax1]

it was carters non-intervention in iran that I am talking about....google carter/shah of iran....I disagree with you, carter made some very bad decisions but it was more being in over his head than being bad at heart.

Yes, Iran certainly didnt work out well.

 

[Jiigzz]

Lol...Ill take that as a compliment I guess.

I think your talking about Guatamala in the 50s which led to the slaughter of 100k+ people, over bananas and Rockefeller's fruits. History keeps repeating itself up to this very day and tomorrow....look more into stuff how the CIA and MI6 overthrew via coup (Operation Ajax) the democratically elected leader of Iran because he wanted to kick Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) (now known as British Petroleum/0 out of his country. They replaced him with the oppressive dictator Mohammad Reza Shah with his secret police, SAVAK,which was as brutal as the Gestapo.. Then you have Saddam Hussein of Iraq installed by the CIA, etc....

Here is a handy timeline of CIA tyranny on one of my go to websites if your into this stuff
Invalid Link Removed

You know, then people here wonder why there are so many terrorists to this day and people that hate us around the world and why I so strongly support Ron Paul and his non-interventionist foreign policy movement.

Haha should have said I used to believe what you said was so farfetched it seemed crazy, not that you yourself are crazy

I am in shock what will be done to secure deals

 

[ax1]

stay on point for just one second---I am referring to the travel ban and judges shooting it down on the basis of trump being anti-muslim.


btw-did you see the fireworks after the dirrell fight last night?

Cant believe a single judge out of 3,000+ can stop a executive order nationwide. That should be reformed.

Those judges are, well....lol Im not going to say it.

I skipped the Dirrell fight, Im going to look for it now and see what happened. I say the Geovanti Davis fight in the UK, and only the main even of the HBO program, I also had to catch up to friday nights WWE NXT this morning too so I had to prioritize lol

 

[ax1]

And he also bowed, just like Obama

That was in exchange for some nice bling bling...Obama was simply trying to get a wiff of the King's penis. (not srs)

 

[thebigt]

Cant believe a single judge out of 3,000+ can stop a executive order nationwide. That should be reformed.

Those judges are, well....lol Im not going to say it.

I skipped the Dirrell fight, Im going to look for it now and see what happened. I say the Geovanti Davis fight in the UK, and only the main even of the HBO program, I also had to catch up to friday nights WWE NXT this morning too so I had to prioritize lol

let me just say that you need to watch the dirrell fight!!!!