I think that if men have to register for selective service, then women should too. I support ACTUAL equality, not liberal PC BS equality.it's also incredibly unfair that women don't have to register for selective service...it's also unfair that if things get sketchy in a combat zone that a woman can screw the entire outfit get pregnant and is outta there. then she claims rape, gets a hardship discharge has military benefits for life after she gets an abortion at militarys expense-then she sues the military for a few million and is set for life.....how is that for a WHAT IF?
I bet you wanna put your special unit into elite women, with special force!! Hubba-Hubba!![]()
I think that if men have to register for selective service, then women should too. I support ACTUAL equality, not liberal PC BS equality.
Most of the speaking fees were from Bill apparently. Book sales also account for some of the money. Why are the standards different for the Clintons than they are for the Trumps? Just curious. Seems like Trump can sell all the books he wants and get paid to speak, as well as manufacture his clothing line overseas and noone talks about that.
Oh, and the reason I'm talking about Trump like that is that we HAVE NO IDEA how much money he made or from what because he won't release his tax returns. Over the last 40 years all presidential candidates have done so.
Invalid Link Removed
see, it's like this...if a man saying he identifies as a female gets him entrance into the womans bathroom...then a man saying he identifies as a woman should be able to compete with women in athletic events.
hey, I am all about fairness!!!
Ehh, should healthy men and women be allowed to compete in the special olympics? There are different criteria for inclusion in different leagues. Sports leagues are private "businesses" or institutions, they should be allowed to allow, or not allow, whoever they want to play. If someone wants to make a dwarf basketball league, I say let them. Should young people be allowed to play in 50+ leagues, etc?finally common ground!!!
then you agree that men should be allowed to participate in 'womens' sports?
Ehh, should healthy men and women be allowed to compete in the special olympics? There are different criteria for inclusion in different leagues. Sports leagues are private "businesses" or institutions, they should be allowed to allow, or not allow, whoever they want to play. If someone wants to make a dwarf basketball league, I say let them. Should young people be allowed to play in 50+ leagues, etc?
I don't think you should be allowed to go into women's restroom unless you have female genetalia and/or have medical evidence that you are in the process of undergoing treatment to have such a procedure done, or are at least on some sort of hormone treatment. We agree on that too.see, it's like this...if a man saying he identifies as a female gets him entrance into the womans bathroom...then a man saying he identifies as a woman should be able to compete with women in athletic events.
hey, I am all about fairness!!!
Trump <> Russia
What's the deal. Real ties? He seems to be buddies with Putin, on multiple fronts. Could he be secretly Putin it in da a$$?
Paul Manafort apparently has ties.....
Invalid Link RemovedClinton was rated trustworthy by just 41 percent of likely voters in a Bloomberg Politics national poll conducted Aug. 5-8. More than half said that the Clinton Foundation’s acceptance of foreign contributions while she was secretary of state bothers them “a lot.”
Invalid Link RemovedBreitbart/Gravis Poll: Hillary Clinton Leads Donald Trump 42% to 37% Nationally in 4-Way with Johnson 9%, Stein 3%
When a Bloomberg (liberal) pole says less than 1/2 of people find Hillary trustworthy, that's a problem:
Invalid Link Removed
Relevant Manafort article:
Invalid Link Removed
Also:
Invalid Link Removed
Is there a link to the actual "study?" It just looked like the text of an interview discussing the study, but if there's one thing we know here on AM, it's that the media has no idea how to read studies, or even what a study is.Very true.
Food for thought here, I'm sure I'll get flamed but IDGAF
Invalid Link Removed
Many things are about unconscious bias, IMO.
Is there a link to the actual "study?" It just looked like the text of an interview discussing the study, but if there's one thing we know here on AM, it's that the media has no idea how to read studies, or even what a study is.
Thanks, I'm curious to read it.This is true. I'm trying to find it right now. Shankar Vedantam is a pretty reputable guy. All he covers is social science research, and I am a social scientist myself (Medical/Urban Anthropologist). Don't expect it to be like clinical trials, LOL. I'll post it up when I find it.
it's also incredibly unfair that women don't have to register for selective service...it's also unfair that if things get sketchy in a combat zone that a woman can screw the entire outfit get pregnant and is outta there. then she claims rape, gets a hardship discharge has military benefits for life after she gets an abortion at militarys expense-then she sues the military for a few million and is set for life.....how is that for a WHAT IF?
When the physical requirement argument was found to be susceptible to allowing women in, a new argument had to be made I suppose.This is a slippery slope logical fallacy if I ever saw one LOL.
finally common ground!!!
then you agree that men should be allowed to participate in 'womens' sports?
Just read the abstract so far. I'm going to have to read thorough the full text before I come t any conclusions though. Have you read through the whole thing yet?Here's one link to the study: Invalid Link Removed
Men participating in women's sports is NOT what equality is about, nor do females wish to contend in males sport.
Equality is about establishing a women's league so they can participate in a sport at an elite level (or any level) just as a male can. People ITT seriously have no idea what equality is.
It's about affording equal opportunity, not holding people to the same standard. How hard is that to grasp? lol.
Just read the abstract so far. I'm going to have to read thorough the full text before I come t any conclusions though. Have you read through the whole thing yet?
This. I have yet to see an elite female athlete complain that it's unfair that she can't play in professional male sports. They know that they aren't on that level. I have also yet to see an elite male athlete want to play in a women's league. Why would they? The only male athlete who would want to is one who couldn't make it in elite male leagues.Men participating in women's sports is NOT what equality is about, nor do females wish to contend in males sport.
Ehh, I'm VERY skeptical of the vast majority of these polls. I'm not saying that they're all actually manipulated, but here's an example to illustrate how a poll can have inherent bias:Looks like Trump has a youth problem:
Invalid Link Removed
Ehh, I'm VERY skeptical of the vast majority of these polls. I'm not saying that they're all actually manipulated, but here's an example to illustrate how a poll can have inherent bias:
Go on a Mustang forum and ask which car is better, the Mustang or Camaro. Now do the same thing on a Camaro forum. I'd expect to see significantly different results from the two polls, haha.
Men participating in women's sports is NOT what equality is about, nor do females wish to contend in males sport.
Equality is about establishing a women's league so they can participate in a sport at an elite level (or any level) just as a male can. People ITT seriously have no idea what equality is.
It's about affording equal opportunity, not holding people to the same standard. How hard is that to grasp? lol.
I haven't read it, but I did take a few statistics courses in school (basic and more advanced courses). It's very easy to manipulate statistics to say what you want. One extremely misleading "statistic" I saw was that Obama was improving the economy by reducing the deficit (leading people to believe that he was decreasing the US debt). In reality, what he was actually doing was decreasing the rate at which we were adding to the amount of money we owe as a country. A similar concept would be if you owed $100,000, and had been adding $20,000 to that debt every year, but this year you only added $10,000 to your debt. Good job! You cut your deficit in half using that logic! Except you now owe even more money than before. Try telling that to your bank. "But I cut my deficit in half!"Agreed. I don't like polls either for that reason. Anyone here ever read the book, "How to Lie with Statistics"? It's actually a really good read.
Men participating in women's sports is NOT what equality is about, nor do females wish to contend in males sport.
Equality is about establishing a women's league so they can participate in a sport at an elite level (or any level) just as a male can. People ITT seriously have no idea what equality is.
It's about affording equal opportunity, not holding people to the same standard. How hard is that to grasp? lol.
I haven't read it, but I did take a few statistics courses in school (basic and more advanced courses). It's very easy to manipulate statistics to say what you want. One extremely misleading "statistic" I saw was that Obama was improving the economy by reducing the deficit (leading people to believe that he was decreasing the US debt). In reality, what he was actually doing was decreasing the rate at which we were adding to the amount of money we owe as a country. A similar concept would be if you owed $100,000, and had been adding $20,000 to that debt every year, but this year you only added $10,000 to your debt. Good job! You cut your deficit in half using that logic! Except you now owe even more money than before. Try telling that to your bank. "But I cut my deficit in half!"
I know you're trolling, but in all honestly, we actually saw one of the first issues with a transgender/post-op athlete last year I think right? I can't remember the details.
Who is trying to put their worm in what hole?or wormholes?![]()
or wormholes?![]()
good one...:toofunny:
Gutterpump...hey if it's 12 noon here what time is it in Canada?
There's 6 time zones in Canada, and I forget where you are hehe
But you know I don't live up there anymore lol
We were talking about candidates updated campaign pages the other day. Looks like Kilary doesn't believe victims of sexual assault deserve to be "believed", like she proclaimed on her website anymore. She said they deserve to be heard and belI even when a woman is a victim of sexual assault. Now she has deleted the part of the statement saying they deserve to be believed.
Invalid Link Removed
Which we all know she attacked all hose women that slick Willy sexualky assaulted over the years.
Milwaukee=more blood and destruction on Obama's hands...oh I forgot, Obama is the modern day pontius pilate, he washes his hands to show he is not responsible!!!

Invalid Link Removed
It's all God's fault for not creating us equal
Oooops, I made a sarcasm![]()
believe it or not but pilate and JESUS are not only biblical but historical also. pilate washing his hands concerning the fate of JESUS is considered a historical fact.
even modern day historians consider most of the bible to be factual.
It's interesting you should say that. I had a geology professor (who was actually an atheist), who said that the plagues of Egypt could have been caused by certain climate and environmental events, including a volcanic eruption, that likely occurred during the same timeframe. Now, some would say that disproves the whole religious/God aspect of it, but does it? I'm sure God could cause these events if he is all powerful.believe it or not but pilate and JESUS are not only biblical but historical also. pilate washing his hands concerning the fate of JESUS is considered a historical fact.
even modern day historians consider most of the bible to be factual.